|
Hi Matt,
Hmmm, this is really very weird. I couldn't recreate the case myself.
Does it still happen to you? Was it happening with any messages you posted or just one particular?
Where you on the article page, or may be you were viewing the version and posted a message while viewing your first "composing" version, not article itself?
Any information you can give will help me finding and fixing the bug.
Thanks in advance.
Sincerely,
Elina Blank
Life is great!!! Enjoy every moment of it! 
|
|
|
|
|
I have several responses to comments in that Article, and this happened every time.
|
|
|
|
|
When you say "when you respond", does that mean "after posting a reply to a message on your article" or "when I click on a link in an email sent to me in response to a message being posted on my article"?
Also: are the messages you are responding to present on the currently published version of the article, or are the messages specific to the composing version of the article?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Re: how I got to the message on the article in order to reply, I believe I used both methods to get there...click on link in email, and just go to the article to check.
It is possible that the original messages that I'm responding to were comments on the composing version. It was approved overnight so the comments may have been maked before it was approved.
(I thought that only Admins and I could see my article while "Composing", but others might be able to see "Pending").
Matt
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps, this is a feature unlocked by reputation points, but should I be able to delete other people's comments?
|
|
|
|
|
If you look at the Rep description: http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/Reputation.aspx[^] it says:
"Delete entries in Quick Answers: Platinum Author, Authority, Editor or Organiser"
Since you have Platinum Author, you have the right to delete in QA - so comments are fair game.
Ideological Purity is no substitute for being able to stick your thumb down a pipe to stop the water
|
|
|
|
|
Fair enough... Just asking to make sure something isn't broke. 
|
|
|
|
|
I did not report this bug, but I mentioned it in my notes to the editor in the process of submission of this Tips/Tricks article:
Using "using" Statements: DisposalAccumulator[^].
It looks like the bug was fixed by today; if so, I would be just interested in some confirmation.
Here what it was: I was unfortunate enough to add a smile (emoticon) to the epigraph. It was correctly modified into the smile image, but when I edited the text in the WYSIWG (non-HTML) mode, it was represented as some text, which looked as the text data for the HTML processing script. Naturally, its was finally rendered as is, not as the <code><img> tag. During last fixed of the article, I did not see this problem anymore.
Thank you,
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Starting logged out;
Click the "sign in to vote" button on the poll on the front page. This takes you to the sign in page. Using the sign in form at the top header not the one on the page main content, login.
you are taken to a "The requested page is not found...(and list of suggestions)"
|
|
|
|
|
Just created an alternative to a blog entry and I was surprised that it appeared as an article. Is this reasonable since the criteria for an article is quite different from a blog entry (at least in my opinion  )
|
|
|
|
|
A technical blog must adhere to the same standards as an article. A blog is just an article written in someone's blog, so it doesn't make sense to have an alternative to a blog be another blog, because you haven't actually blogged the alternative - you've posted it as an article.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
My brain hurts after trying to read that convoluted statement... although I am tired right nuyl,jvktfykuftkhf
I think computer viruses should count as life. I think it says something about human nature that the only form of life we have created so far is purely destructive. We've created life in our own image.
Stephen Hawking
|
|
|
|
|
I glad it wasn't just me, serious bit of wtf going on!
|
|
|
|
|
All I got from that were lame justifications.
|
|
|
|
|
Really? We can easily make alternatives be blogs, but...but...they aren't blogs. They are articles.
What's your preference?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
To keep winding you up mate. 
|
|
|
|
|
That's so not fair. I'm pre-coffee. Pre coffee, for the love of God!
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Nurse! Double strength espresso! Stat.
|
|
|
|
|
Have a ![Beer | [beer]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/beer.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
Let me try again.
We have a bunch of different article "types": Article, Technical Blog, Tip and Video. We suck in the blog postings of members, create them as articles, and mark them as Technical Blogs in order to give the readers a hint that the formatting and layout may be a little odd because it was sucked in from someone's blog feed. "Like" buttons, potentially broken images, references to other blog posts, odd colours in code colourisation etc may be included and may look a little odd, so my hope is that the "Technical Blog" label will allow readers to forgive small transgressions.
But these Technical Blog articles are still articles.
If you create an alternative to a blog article then you're not creating something sucked in from an XML feed. You won't (I hope) include weirdness. Further, and most importantly, your alternative was never posted as a blog that was subsequently sucked in by our blog aggregator. When you post an alternative to a blog you are not posting a blog. You're posting an article that presents an alternative to the blog.
So we label them as Articles.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Better. (I think)
I think computer viruses should count as life. I think it says something about human nature that the only form of life we have created so far is purely destructive. We've created life in our own image.
Stephen Hawking
|
|
|
|
|
Made perfect sense the first time, I thought.
One of these days I'm going to think of a really clever signature.
|
|
|
|
|
What, no mention of unicorns?
I shakes my head....... 
Chris Maunder wrote: So we label them as Articles.
"Then on the seventh day, Maunder rested".
|
|
|
|
|
DaveAuld wrote: "Then on the seventh day, Maunder rested".
 
I think computer viruses should count as life. I think it says something about human nature that the only form of life we have created so far is purely destructive. We've created life in our own image.
Stephen Hawking
|
|
|
|
|
Now when I read my question again I think it needs clarification:
What surprised me was that the alternative was listed as a new article in the CP front page. What I was expecting was that it would have been in the Blogs queue even though it's technically stored as an article (after all it's an alternative to a blog entry).
The other thing was that I feel that the alternative is over valued. Based on on the information about the rep system, a new blog entry is worth 10 points. Now if the alternative is worth 100 points, that doesn't quite make sense.
As a personal opinion I think alternatives (article/blog/tip) are often lighter than the original posts since they can mostly refer to the original text, code etc. So I feel that an alternative should be worth less than the original one, for example 50% of points. So in the case of a blog entry (worth 10 points) the altenative should receive 5 points.
Does that make any sense
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
