|
INSERT INTO Table( field1,field2)
VALUES (@value1, @value2);
You don't need the quotes or they'll be interpreted as literal strings.
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair.
nils illegitimus carborundum
me, me, me
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Mark, thanks for replying I've already tried using no quote, single and double quotes without much luck. However, I've just found out that since I'm using Access, I have to use square brackets. My problem is now solved.
modified 3-Aug-12 17:31pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Really? How bizarre. Years and years since I used it and I don't recall having to do that. Oh well, relearn something, err, old, every day...
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair.
nils illegitimus carborundum
me, me, me
|
|
|
|
|
mark merrens wrote: Really? How bizarre.
VALUE is a reserved keyword; it would be like having a variable called "SELECT".
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
if you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
ASPnoob wrote: VALUES ('@value1', '@value2'); ... param.ParameterName="@myvalue";
As mentioned, remove the apostrophes.
The names have to match as well.
|
|
|
|
|
i could not change a field in a table when table saved
when i want to change a field or add a field an error raised
appreantly i have right to change everything
could you solve my problem 
|
|
|
|
|
Yazdan Attarian wrote: when i want to change a field or add a field an error raised
Unless you share the exact error with details, it would be difficult for anyone to even guess out.
|
|
|
|
|
Yazdan Attarian wrote: could you solve my problem
Maybe, probably.... if you would actually describe a particular problem.
Yazdan Attarian wrote: an error raised
Does not in any way describe any sort of a problem. We are not mind readers.
Why is common sense not common?
Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level where they are an expert.
Sometimes it takes a lot of work to be lazy
Please stand in front of my pistol, smile and wait for the flash - JSOP 2012
|
|
|
|
|
This is a SSMS setting. Sorry I am currently running something that is tying my system up so I cannot find it under Tools\Options
|
|
|
|
|
Do it using SQL Script (like alter etc...) instead of using SSMS
Niladri Biswas
(Code Project MVP 2012)
|
|
|
|
|
Suppose I have two tables (Emp and EmpCopy) in sql server database with following data:
Case 1: Data in Emp and EmpCopy table present like below:
Table: Emp
Id Name
----------------------
1 Emp_Name
2 Emp_Age
3 Emp_City
Table: EmpCopy
Id Name
--------------------
1 Emp_Name
2 Emp_Age
Case 2: Data in Emp and EmpCopy table present like below:
Table: Emp
Id Name
--------------------
1 Emp_Name
2 Emp_Age
Table: EmpCopy
Id Name
---------------------
1 Emp_Name
2 Emp_Age
3 Emp_City
Now according to cases given above I want retrieve records from both the tables, just like given below
Case 1:
Id Emp_Column EmpCopy_Column
1 Emp_Name Emp_Name
2 Emp_Age Emp_Age
3 Emp_City NULL
Case 2:
Id Emp_Column EmpCopy_Column
1 Emp_Name Emp_Name
2 Emp_Age Emp_Age
3 NULL Emp_City
Please reply ASAP.
Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
Suppose you had a script that created those tables, and inserted some data in it; wouldn't that cost about just as much time as writing all those fields like that?
The advantage of a script would be that it's clearly to read, easy to see what is going on, easily validated using copy/paste, and you'd probably get more (usefull) answers - simply because more people tend to paste a piece of Sql and try it, than to read a long story.
Rohit Kesharwani wrote: Please reply ASAP.
If your boss planned in too little time to research, than that's HIS problem. Not mine, not yours.
To prove that point, I'll be fetching some coffee. I suggest you post your code in PRE tags, including one or two queries that you already tried. They needn't be good, we're not going to whine about it; it's just a good idea to have "proof" you tried something.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
if you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Eddy Vluggen wrote: To prove that point, I'll be fetching some coffee. I suggest you post your code in PRE tags, including one or two queries that you already tried. They needn't be good, we're not going to whine about it; it's just a good idea to have "proof" you tried something.
+5 purely for that!
Lobster Thermidor aux crevettes with a Mornay sauce, served in a Provençale manner with shallots and aubergines, garnished with truffle pate, brandy and a fried egg on top and Spam - Monty Python Spam Sketch
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
i have a SQL database select Query which brings 60 columns from 10 tables via join. i need to fetch 300000(3 Lacs) rows from database. It takes 18-19 seconds to fetch 300000 rows. I want to decrease this execution time to 10-12 secs.
I used "DATABASE ENGINE TUNING ADVISER of SQL SERVER 2008 R2, it suggested me 2 create some Indexes and statistics. I have created all this, but could not improved the performance of my query.
can anybody suggest me right solution ???
This my query-
select
i.IssueId, i.IssueNumber, i.TeamId, t.Name AS TeamName, i.IssueStatus, p1.TextValue AS StatusText, p1.SortNumber AS StatusOrder, i.Substatus,
p2.TextValue AS SubstatusText, p2.SortNumber AS SubstatusOrder, i.CreatedBy, cc.FullName AS CreatedByFullName, i.CreatedAt, i.UpdatedBy,
cu.FullName AS UpdatedByFullName, i.UpdatedAt, i.ReportedBy, cReported.FullName AS ReportedByFullName, i.ReportedAt, i.Title, i.Description, i.Severity,
pSeverity.TextValue AS SeverityText, i.Priority, pPriority.TextValue AS PriorityText, i.IssueType, pType.TextValue AS TypeText, pType.SortNumber AS TypeOrder,
i.Subtype1, pST1.TextValue AS SubType1Text, pST1.SortNumber AS SubType1Order, i.Subtype2, pST2.TextValue AS SubType2Text,
pST2.SortNumber AS SubType2Order, i.ProjectId, pr.Name AS ProjectName, i.LocationId, lc.Name AS LocationName, i.DepartmentId, dp.Name AS DepartmentName,
i.Escalated, i.AssignedTo, ucAssign.FullName AS AssignedToFullName, i.AssignedAt, i.DueAt, i.ClosedAt, i.ClosedBy, udf.UDFString1, udf.UDFBool1, udf.UDFInt1,
udf.UDFUserId1, udfc1.FullName AS UDFUser1Name, udf.UDFPickList1, udfp1.TextValue AS UDFPickList1Text, udfp1.SortNumber AS UDFPickList1Order, t.TenantId,
uc.LoginEmail, uc.UserId, DATEDIFF(d, i.CreatedAt, GETDATE()) AS Age, i.AttachmentCount
FROM dbo.ITIssue AS i INNER JOIN
dbo.PicklistItem AS p1 ON i.IssueStatus = p1.PicklistItemId LEFT OUTER JOIN
dbo.PicklistItem AS p2 ON i.Substatus = p2.PicklistItemId INNER JOIN
dbo.PicklistItem AS pType ON i.IssueType = pType.PicklistItemId LEFT OUTER JOIN
dbo.PicklistItem AS pST1 ON i.Subtype1 = pST1.PicklistItemId LEFT OUTER JOIN
dbo.PicklistItem AS pST2 ON i.Subtype2 = pST2.PicklistItemId LEFT OUTER JOIN
dbo.PicklistItem AS pSeverity ON i.Severity = pSeverity.PicklistItemId LEFT OUTER JOIN
dbo.PicklistItem AS pPriority ON i.Priority = pPriority.PicklistItemId LEFT OUTER JOIN
dbo.Project AS pr ON i.ProjectId = pr.ProjectId LEFT OUTER JOIN
dbo.Location AS lc ON i.LocationId = lc.LocationId LEFT OUTER JOIN
dbo.Department AS dp ON i.DepartmentId = dp.DepartmentId INNER JOIN
dbo.TenantUser AS uc ON i.CreatedBy = uc.UserId LEFT OUTER JOIN
dbo.TenantUser AS uu ON i.UpdatedBy = uu.UserId LEFT OUTER JOIN
dbo.TenantUser AS uAssign ON i.AssignedTo = uAssign.UserId LEFT OUTER JOIN
dbo.Contact AS ucAssign ON uAssign.ContactId = ucAssign.ContactId LEFT OUTER JOIN
dbo.Contact AS cc ON uc.ContactId = cc.ContactId LEFT OUTER JOIN
dbo.Contact AS cu ON uu.ContactId = cu.ContactId LEFT OUTER JOIN
dbo.UDFValues AS udf ON udf.EntityId = i.IssueId LEFT OUTER JOIN
dbo.TenantUser AS udfu1 ON udfu1.UserId = udf.UDFUserId1 LEFT OUTER JOIN
dbo.Contact AS udfc1 ON udfu1.ContactId = udfc1.ContactId LEFT OUTER JOIN
dbo.PicklistItem AS udfp1 ON udfp1.PicklistItemId = udf.UDFPickList1 INNER JOIN
dbo.Team AS t ON t.TeamId = i.TeamId LEFT OUTER JOIN
dbo.TenantUser AS uRepored ON i.ReportedBy = uRepored.UserId LEFT OUTER JOIN
dbo.Contact AS cReported ON cReported.ContactId = uRepored.ContactId
|
|
|
|
|
Count your blessings. I'd be ecstatic if some of the queries I'm working on currently took only twenty seconds.
One of the techniques I found that improved some of the worst (similar to yours) from several hours to about twenty minutes is the use of Common Table Expressions.
Instead of
SELECT ...
FROM A
INNER JOIN B...
INNER JOIN C...
INNER JOIN D...
You can do
WITH a AS
(
SELECT ...
FROM A
INNER JOIN B ...
)
, b AS
(
SELECT ...
FROM a
INNER JOIN C ...
)
SELECT ...
FROM b
INNER JOIN D ...
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: Count your blessings
I agree. 18-19 seconds on a query that looks like its working with a good number of tables, and joins which is returning 300k rows does seem to horrible. Good luck to him at shaving down anymore time on it.
"Any sort of work in VB6 is bound to provide several WTF moments." - Christian Graus
|
|
|
|
|
I agree with the performance observed. A query which returns 300K rows is typically not a online transaction where a user is waiting for the results to display, so what does it matter if you shave a few seconds off the execution time? (rhetorical question here)
Also noted is that there is no "where clause", so each time this query is run it will take longer and longer. Right? More and more data will be created each day...
If this is an online transaction, then maybe a strategy where summary tables are populated as transactions are being generated might be something to investigate.
|
|
|
|
|
I would strip your query down to the INNER JOINs and execute into a temp table. Optimize this if necessary. Then I would apply the LEFT JOIN lookups to the temp table.
I have found that complex queries can sometimes be sped up by a huge factor when broken up logically. In this case, you have the engine joining and executing numerous correlated subqueries (in the form of LEFT JOINS) at the same time.
|
|
|
|
|
In addition to Michael Potters suggestion, identify the inner join or where clause that reduces the quantity by the most records, this is the same as MPs suggestion except more focused. Shove that into either a temp table or table var. A temp table may have indexes applied if required.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
I am using full text search to search through PDF documents using the Adobe iFilter. Everything works fine. Now, is it possible that I get a sentence which contains my searched keyword? For example:
Keyword:
'fox'
Query result:
'The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog.'
'Fox is a small red animal.'
modified 3-Aug-12 7:53am.
|
|
|
|
|
Member 8024623 wrote: Now, is it possible that I get a sentence which contains my searched keyword?
Ehr.. yes, especially since you already mentioned that it works. Did you give it a try?
I got the feeling that I'm misunderstanding your question. English isn't my native tongue, and it helps if there's a bit explanation and some code to give an indication of what is expected. That said, kudo's for including the example with the expected output 
Bastard Programmer from Hell
if you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
I also think you've misunderstood my question When I said that everything works fine I meant that full text search over PDF documents works. I can retrieve a PDF document that contains a searched keyword. But, I need to retrieve a sentence or sentences from that or any other document that contain that keyword.
|
|
|
|
|
asimptota777 wrote: But, I need to retrieve a sentence or sentences from that or any other document that contain that keyword.
Then you will need IFilters for each type of document that's in your database. There's no way of reading "every" document, since each fileformat (and their versions) have different encodings and layouts.
You can download those for Office here[^] (2007/2010).
If you have a document in there in your own file-format (binary serialized data?) you'd probably have to provide your own IFilter implementation (guidelines on MSDN).
All existing and wide-used formats should have an implementation, since the same IFilter is in use for Desktop Search, SharePoint and the likes. And of course, CodeProject[^] has a lot of articles on the subject.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
if you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for an answer but I think you haven't read my question carefully. In my first post I said that I store PDF documents in the database (in the Filestream to be precise)and I use Adobe iFilter for full text search through PDF documents. That works fine. What I need is a way to get sentences from those PDF documents that contain a certain keyword. What T-SQL syntax can I use to extract sentences that contain a certain word?
|
|
|
|
|
asimptota777 wrote: What T-SQL syntax can I use to extract sentences that contain a certain word?
USE AdventureWorks2012;
GO
DECLARE @SearchWord nvarchar(30)
SET @SearchWord = N'performance'
SELECT Description
FROM Production.ProductDescription
WHERE FREETEXT(Description, @SearchWord);
From MSDN[^]
Bastard Programmer from Hell
if you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
