|
I kind of enjoyed it back in the day .. Just me and PERL on my EditPlus app and HTML/JavaScript. Life was simple !
|
|
|
|
|
Greg and Svein decided to make Mighty Moose free. This is not a decision that is being take lightly and much thought has gone into it. This post is to explain why they went free and the future of their continuous integration tool. Making sure business goals are aligned with personal goals: changing the way people code.
|
|
|
|
|
So you want to know more about development for Window 8. Great! There are lots of reasons you should be excited about this. Since I don’t know why YOU are interested in this, I’ll make a list of reasons people can choose from. So… Why would you care about making an app for Windows 8? 5 good reasons for going Metro.
|
|
|
|
|
Great reasons? That article looked like
1. Cause I'm a fanboi
2. Cause I'm a fanboi
3. Cause I'm a fanboi
4. Cause I'm a fanboi
5. Cause I'm a fanboi
It didn't contain any info about the platform or why it would be good business at all :/
|
|
|
|
|
All the Metro UI arguments I've heard so far from Microsoft and all of the fanbois remind me of the line from National Lampoon's Vacation where the slimey car salesman sticks Clark Griswald with the Family Truckster. To quote him, Quote: You think you hate it now, but just wait until you drive it.
QRZ? de WAØTTN
|
|
|
|
|
The core problem for OEMs is this: they want to offer a unique OEM-specific experience as a way to differentiate from their competitors and allow them to squeeze a little extra margin out of otherwise undifferentiated systems. Most of the time what you see out of OEMs just seems like a hack. This isn’t just about PCs. Wonder why Android Tablets haven’t made a dent in the iPad? It is the same factors that are causing PCs to lose ground to Apple products. Surface follows the modern consumer computing device playbook, OEMs don’t.
|
|
|
|
|
Now that person gets it.
Enjoyed the article. 
|
|
|
|
|
It's not OEM, it's Microsoft. The only reason iPod/iPhone/iOS had conquered the market was a consolidated marketplace where developers/publishers/artists can with minimum startup cost publish their work and start making money and end-user doesn't have to browse around forever to find piece of media/software they need. Any music player would play MP3 files but iTunes made it easy to find, check review and download. Up until recent Microsoft Store, user would need to hunt down and struggle with download of the content they want. That's by the way is the reason Kindle Fire took off - plenty of easy-to-find contents.
Besides there is a "good enough" factor. If price difference is substantial user may decide to settle (as they do with $300 laptops). If components are priced similarly, there is no reason to settle. Low end android devices are crap. High end - priced similarly to iPod and there is no reason to go for second best - might as well get the best.
Microsoft have an uphill battle. Just because the Metro interface is arguably better is not sufficient. They need to create a marketplace (which they started with they new store) and make sure it's loaded with contents, create devices that are either better than iPod or significantly cheaper - which might be a problem.
A lot of content developers I imagine will take a wait and see approach - you don't want to spend your development dollars to build a contents for the marketplace w/o future or the marketplace where backing company doesn't honor backward compatibility.
|
|
|
|
|
After computers were made of bronze cogs but before they were made of integrated circuits, they were made of paper, they were found in books. All of this is just another dimension of the relationship between book and computer. More than containers that sometimes compete for the same information, they are on the family tree of a daunting ambition to compute and compile all that can be known. Each in their own time they are the best-fit materials for the job. Lullian Circles and the long history of paper computing.
|
|
|
|
|
Have you ever wanted your users to click your links, but didn’t know how to get them to act? When some designers run into this problem they’re tempted to use the words “click here” on their links. Before you give in to the temptation, you should know that using these words on a link can affect how users experience your interface. To learn more, click... er, read on!
|
|
|
|
|
It's certainly safe at this point to say that flash has won the war in the mobile space—I don't think we'll ever see another tablet or phone based on anything other than solid state storage. The war for the proverbial desktop (which includes most laptops) is far from over, with hard disk drives still outnumbering SSDs in most traditional computers. Still, SSDs are in enough places doing enough things that modern operating systems have changed to accommodate them. Long live Flash RAM! You've saved your Earth. Have a nice day.
|
|
|
|
|
The touchpad problem illustrates why Microsoft had to build the Surface rather than let its hardware partners take the lead on Windows 8 tablets. Making a great trackpad isn’t easy. Humble as it seems, perfecting the interface depends on a host of skills that most companies don’t possess—top-notch industrial design, perfectionist control over manufacturing processes, and, most importantly, software that’s finely crafted to work with the hardware. If PC vendors can’t even get this small thing right, how could they possibly make something as polished as an iPad? If you want it done right, you have to do it yourself.
|
|
|
|
|
Software licensing is and will remain a viable revenue stream for the foreseeable future. But both public market valuations and observed behaviors of strategic software players indicate that the days of software licensing as a primary revenue stream are potentially over. If the world’s largest software firm pivoting into hardware doesn’t convince you that the world is changing, my question to you is: what would? The value of software in general is not in decline... just bad software.
|
|
|
|
|
It is time for the participants in the Tracking Protection Working Group to take a long, hard look at where the process is going. It is time for the rest of us to tell them, loudly, that the process is going awry. It is true that Do Not Track, at least in the present regulatory environment, is voluntary. But it does not follow that the standard should allow “compliant” websites to pick and choose which pieces to comply with. No means no, and Do Not Track means Do Not Track.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Really sad to read about it... it's amazing how many bad moves AOL has made in its lifetime (as a company). You'd figure they would have rebranded themselves by now, considering just about everyone considers AOL old news by now.
|
|
|
|
|
Future MS Office to be loaded with social features [Ars Technica][^]
modified 25-Jun-12 18:15pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Windows systems infected with Trojan.Milicenso are spitting out pages with random wingdings on thousands of printers. [ITworld]
|
|
|
|
|
In one year the number of tracking firms have doubled and the amount of data they collect has grown more than 400 percent, according to a study by Krux Digital. [ITworld]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Who is Stephen Hawkins? 
|
|
|
|
|
He is Stephen Hawking's stunt double.
|
|
|
|
|
When I was learning PowerShell, I thought of it as a scripting language that has a shell. But the right way to think of it may be the opposite, a shell that has a scripting language. Apparently others have followed this same change of perspective. Don Jones and Jeffrey Hicks first saw PowerShell as a VBScript replacement and taught it that way.
|
|
|
|
|
That seems to be an improvement over the first power shell tutorials that started by trying to convince you that monads are simple, really.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
