|
Thank you for your response,
Yes, it was the article you mentioned.
I got again complaint, from the same user, that the files are impossible download.
I checked it myself and they're OK to download.
So I guess there is something else on the way between the user and the files.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We're digging in as we speak. Or type. Or feverishly pretending to be busy reading the Lounge instead of working - whichever the case may be.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
There's good stuff in the lounge  . I recommend taking that tack.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
In my new article I am using a video to explain and show a concept.
I am having trouble getting the video properly embedded in the article. I have use the insert video link from the article editor. But it now only works correctly in Internet Explorer. Chrome and Firefox both show a big empty area.
Can anyone help me with this?
Thanks!
modified 25-Jun-12 3:40am.
|
|
|
|
|
Should be good now?
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, it works great now.
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Dalek Dave emailed me last night, and it still hasn't come through to my account 24 hours later. I checked my spam, just in case, and nothing. Are you backed up in the email U bend?
|
|
|
|
|
All emails sent from Dalek Dave's CP login requires manual moderation. This is hard-coded for several good reasons. 
"Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.
|
|
|
|
|
Dalekian mail gets blocked in the weekend by most service providers; it is known to cause havoc, the server's main fuses getting blown is the least one should expect when a DD message hits the mail port. I'm afraid you'll have to wait till Monday, unless some media flash says otherwise of course.
|
|
|
|
|
It's not us that's backed up after a big, big night on the turps...
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
It's Monday. I didn't get my email (because my account didn't exist) and I'm feeling lied to. But what can I expect from a Dalek?
This site is very cool, long time lurker, never joiner beforer.
|
|
|
|
|
Member 10945870 wrote: long time lurker
In this case you know not to trust anyone.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
flowplayer is displayed instead of my article:
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/12350/Generating-Fractals-with-SSE-SSE2
How could it be corrected?
Regards,
Peter.
|
|
|
|
|
Looks good now.
(BTW - great article!)
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Account are disappearing, you just lost any article, you are lucky person for sure 
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, there are some people, at my site, who are trying somehow to nail me, they are using all mechanisms to cause trouble, they are trying to get help of code project members they know to play their games,
I published an article "Building High Performance WPF/E Enterprise Class Application in C# 4.5", the article is really good talk many new stuffs, i posted over net, that i published this article, in facebook, then i guess they came to know and trying somehow to nail me, started receving some bad comments, baseless arguments, i guess they are taking help of their friends who are already code project members to nail me,
They are simply making some bad comments over there, argue baseless thing,
Though i argued with them by directly comparing with their article still they are using their different friends to play games.
Today only i have answered many question, what i clearly observed, as soon i rate and move on another question, within half an hour those answers were rated as 1, simply even though answers were correct.
Now also i answered many questions such thing not happening as it is early morning in india, 00:00 A.M
Again morning what change happens, they are just playing with me.
I expect to drop the comment on Pete O'Hanlon and Ian Shlasko.
Also I expect to know who voted my answers, those were rated bad, they used common logic there, just find what all i am answering and rate 1 to it, drop those votes and possibly let me know who voted it, as no comments there.
Aslo block visibility of my articles, q&A, Messages etc, directly seen from my account, in the sense if they move to my account and want to see what all he has published they should not be able to see.
If ppl. are reading q&A and see my answers they can comment, by this way we can avoid these fellows, pl. do it, they are throwing water on my efforts purposefully
|
|
|
|
|
OK.
You posted an article and two of our top members have commented and provided constructive criticism. You have, in turn attacked them and accused them of being fake accounts.
Your article has many, many votes from brand new accounts whose only activity is to create an account and vote on your article.
I will no open up the voting so you can see who has voted, and I will not block the view of your posted material from other members.
Let it go. Your article is up, you have received feedback that should be taken as constructive, and so the best course of action is to continue to improve your article and respond to the comments on the article's technical merits.
I will look into any downvoting that has occurred, but all members have the right to vote on the technical merit of content. If I see patterns of voting that suggest a member is systematically and baselessly downvoting, then I'll talk to them.
However, do not bring your personal grievances here.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris,
That account has been made deactivated, really don't understand why, his article was good, what he said were also right, i saw the answers, he comments were purposefuly devoted, while the other answers appeared to not voted at all.
Because so much of conversation was happening, i checked with creating another account and try to vote, there is IP Tracker already in place, it says "Someone at your adrress has already voted" how can it happen,
The code project has provision for the people to create the account and vote, even when i felt his article intersting i created the account and voted, as it didn't allowed directly, you would have made some changes to this application so that ppl. with so much of points and member of code project community only can vote.
This creates problems too, because even i have been using code project for several year, only ppl. who want to download, or rate or publish an article willing to create account, many ppl. even inside code project will not vote for long time, you can't blame those as spam.
Also some ppl. who were jealous of him, can devote through their friends, because what has been seen is his comments were devote while other comments or answers have same rating.
If your code project has made his account deactive, it's really heartbreaking and with no reasons, anyone get provoked when you call them you are dishonest, and also these articles were read by many and they have different opinion on them, it's like throwing water on somebody's work, we are seeing him answering 25-30 questions on daily basis, which is good sign, i saw he is rated as the expert answerer for last 24 hours list from code project and he is in 3rd place.
Anyone would have replied like that if someone comments without head and tail on them and they think it could create serious impact on audience.....
You are only guy who can bring him back, don't nail him on nonsense grounds, it would he helpful for everyone.
Act upon this...
|
|
|
|
|
|
He momemtarily forgot that he was using a sock-puppet.
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
No need to add to the debris.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
And you are not the same guy using a sock-puppet, are you? 
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
ashutoshmishra171 wrote: don't nail him on nonsense grounds
I doubt Chris was the one who deactivated the account.
ashutoshmishra171 wrote: it would he helpful for everyone
Really?
I know I'm going to come across as the big bad ogre here, seemingly picking on him, but I did offer him advice on what youhe could do to improve the article. Sadly, rather than listening and taking it on board, a vitriolic troll war took place. There was also a perception that accounts were created by the author merely to upvote the article - whenever so many accounts are created in such a short space of time, people deem it to be suspicious as we have seen this happen on so many other occassions.
An interesting thing was people's insistence that they were learning a lot, some even claiming the code was really helpful - yet there was very little code beyond a small snippet, and a picture of the K Smart framework that people mysteriously divined the purpose of, even though it was an abstract diagram with no context. I appreciate that a lot of work was put into the article, but the author failed to understand that posting an article is just the first step - if people comment that they think there's a problem with the article and detail what they think those problems are, the wise author listens and tries to improve the article. Even a note against a comment stating that you understand the other persons point of view, and you are sticking with your guns for points X, Y and Z is a valid approach.
The line in your post that brings a wry smile to my face is that people downvoted because they were jealous. By the great prophet Zarquon, if I were to downvote because of jealousy, I'd target Sacha Barber, Marc Clifton, Nish, Chris M, Josh Smith, Karl Shifflett and so on, rather than voting them 5 for excellent articles. A good article is a joy to read, and I had hoped that this article would turn out to be a treatise on how to do performance right in WPF as there is no one place detailing best practices and the performance gotchas (which is why I commented that there was nothing on Freezables, virtualization and the like). Sadly, it looks like this article is not going to get that improvement so I will wait for someone else to write it.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
