The Weird and The Wonderful

Robert Rohde wrote:

Its nothing that will get checked in in production code or anything like that.

Robert Rohde wrote:

Directory.EnumerateFiles(args[0], "*.cs", SearchOption.AllDirectories).AsParallel().Select(f => new { File = f, Bytes = File.ReadAllBytes(f) }).Select(f => new { File = f.File, Bytes = f.Bytes, Encoding = f.Bytes.Take(3).SequenceEqual(new byte[] { 239, 187, 191 }) ? Encoding.UTF8 : Encoding.Default }).ForAll(f => File.WriteAllText(f.File, f.Encoding.GetString(f.Bytes).Split(new string[] { Environment.NewLine }, StringSplitOptions.None).Select(l => new { Line = l, Index = l.Select((c, i) => new { Char = c, Index = i }).FirstOrDefault(c => c.Char != ' ' && c.Char != '\t') }).Select(l => l.Index == null ? l.Line : l.Line.Select((c, i) => (i < l.Index.Index && c == '\t') ? "    " : c.ToString()).Aggregate((s1, s2) => s1 + s2)).Aggregate((s1, s2) => s1 + Environment.NewLine + s2), f.Encoding));

 

Quote:

The code was executed exactly one time (ignoring test runs) and will never be touched again. Its nothing that will get checked in in production code or anything like that.

RobCroll wrote:

Interesting, I actually prefer tabs.

PIEBALDconsult wrote:

That's sort of a way to (temporarily) comment-out
the then-section for testing. It probably shouldn't have made it to
production.

englebart wrote:

Personal Pet Peeve: initializing variables to 0 or null when you can safely initialize a few lines later.

Albert Holguin wrote:

That's pretty darn ironic... an error in the
showerr() function...