|
|
|
|
This one: http://www.codeproject.com/Members/ysplayzaid[^].
Spammed in:
how to create columns dynamically in a grid view in vb.net code[^],
how do create instance of Form With String[^],
how to create columns dynamically in a grid view in vb.net code[^],
Use of the MCI mciSendString(...) function requiring a window procedure function[^],
how to create columns dynamically in a grid view in vb.net code[^],
how do create instance of Form With String[^],
how to create columns dynamically in a grid view in vb.net code[^],
Use of the MCI mciSendString(...) function requiring a window procedure function[^],
Outlook 2003 Addin: How to create a setup file[^],
Read and Show the document in a page(aspx)[^];
Extra posts were revealed in cross-references, plus one more spammer (below).
One more spammer:
http://www.codeproject.com/Members/lbuyoflondon[^].
At:
Use of the MCI mciSendString(...) function requiring a window procedure function[^],
how to create columns dynamically in a grid view in vb.net code[^].
Thank you,
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spammer. Multiple Occations [^]
Every new day is another chance to change your life.
|
|
|
|
|
An article up for approval: How to teach your old ASP.NET web site modern Content Management tricks[^]
The thing is, to try it, or even check the article works, you have to sign up for a website - or you don't have the code.
Personally I think this should get a "no", but I'm not sure which type, and I'm not sure if it counts as spam instead.
Any ideas?
Ideological Purity is no substitute for being able to stick your thumb down a pipe to stop the water
|
|
|
|
|
|
The account was still alive, but I reported the account, and it's gone 
The quick red ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This message, Outlook 2003 Addin: How to create a setup file[^] has been a magnet for spam for some reason
Why is common sense not common?
Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level where they are an expert.
Sometimes it takes a lot of work to be lazy
Individuality is fine, as long as we do it together - F. Burns
|
|
|
|
|
I took the liberty of deleting the messages, let's see if that stops them.
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
The accounts:
http://www.codeproject.com/Members/smbreswest
5 posts
http://www.codeproject.com/Members/eagesseltrish
4 posts
http://www.codeproject.com/Members/lortellreth
4 posts
http://www.codeproject.com/Members/gingag
4 posts
http://www.codeproject.com/Members/rlteruth
4 posts
http://www.codeproject.com/Members/wesawwalt
3 posts
Pages (not all of them, apparently):
http://www.codeproject.com/Questions/349101/How-to-write-an-XM-music-file-format-player
http://www.codeproject.com/Answers/349165/How-to-add-a-menu-item-into-the-Visual-Studio-6-0
http://www.codeproject.com/Answers/349233/I-need-Help-on-how-to-add-a-title-name-on-the-list
The problem here is:
When I was preparing this post, somebody removed many of the spam posts. I failed to complete tracking using the pages where the first found spammer was posting. When I followed other spammed pages, I found some extra spammers. This is the reason I do not delete the spam post, but replace it content.
I understand that having a direct access to the database, it's possible to track removed spam posts and find more spammers, and ultimately delete both posts and account, but deletion of posts blocks the attempts to chain the search.
What can be done about it?
Thank you,
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
I'm sorry SA, but some of the posts you mentioned may very well have been removed by myself. I did mention the culprits in my post below though. I do agree that we need a better procedure to deal with this. If you care to share your ideas you'll find me an attentive listener!
Thanks for participating,
Manfred
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine."
Ross Callon, The Twelve Networking Truths, RFC1925
modified 17-Mar-12 21:06pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I exchanged some ideas with Chris about using Bayesian filters and related stuff, keep thinking about this problem.
Thank you,
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
For now, I do the following:
I replace the spam content with
"[Spam content removed, the offender's account disabled — SA]"
or
"[Spam content removed, the offender's account to be disabled — SA]"
And I don't remove the post if the account is not yet disabled. I report spamming posts and offender's accounts, cumulatively, chaining be a link to account, then to offender's posts, then to the pages of spam where I could find other offenders, recursively.
It's important to remove accounts as soon as possible; the post could be removed later. I remember well that the bombers and fighter are best removed at the airport; it's much harder to do after they take off…
I also would like them to be edited as I've shown before, because after deletion they still could be read — why? I would really love complete removal from Web pages and database.
Thank you,
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This one[^] here[^]
[also appears to hav an article in the pipeline somewhere...]
Peter
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994.
|
|
|
|
|
From the one and only post he has, I don't see the spam, or abuse.
Or why he got downvoted - it seemed a reasonable, polite reply to a question.
Am I missing something?
Ideological Purity is no substitute for being able to stick your thumb down a pipe to stop the water
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
