|
By
stylesmylez
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.ComponentModel;
using System.Data;
using System.Drawing;
using System.Text;
using System.Windows.Forms;
using System.IO;
namespace SplitFile
{
public partial class Form1 : Form
{
public Form1()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
private String _sPLITe = null;
//private SaveFileDialog sPLITeFM;
private void btnSplit_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
//statusBar.Text = DateTime.Today;
OpenFileDialog dlg = new OpenFileDialog();
dlg.Title = "Open Photo";
dlg.Filter = "Windows Bitmap Files (*.bmp)|*.bmp"
+ "|All files (*.*)|*.*";
if (dlg.ShowDialog() == DialogResult.OK)
{
try
{
//pbxPhoto.Image = new Bitmap(dlg.OpenFile());
_sPLITe = dlg.FileName;
Split300DividedbyLenthorSizeOfFile(_sPLITe);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
MessageBox.Show("Unable to load file: " + ex.Message);
}
}
dlg.Dispose();
}
private void Split300DividedbyLenthorSizeOfFile(string inputFile)
{
//string inputFile = txtInputFile.Text; // Substitute this with your Input File
FileStream fs = new FileStream(inputFile, FileMode.Open, FileAccess.Read);
//int numberOfFilesx = Convert.ToInt32(txtChunks.Text);
//int sizeOfEachFilex = (int)Math.Ceiling((double)fs.Length);
//txtChunks.Text= string txtChunksx;
////new byte [(int)fs.Length / 300000000]);
//int numberOfFilexs =
// (Convert.ToInt32(fs.Length / 1500000));
//int numberOfFiles = Convert.ToInt32(txtChunks.Text);
int sizeOfEachFile =
(int)Math.Ceiling((double)
fs.Length /
//Devided By inserted Peace to get Amount example 3000/1500=2
(Convert.ToInt32(fs.Length / 1500000)));
for (int i = 1; i <=
//Devided By inserted Peace MB to get Amount. example 3000/1500=2
(Convert.ToInt32(fs.Length / 1500000))
; i++)
{
string baseFileName = Path.GetFileNameWithoutExtension(inputFile);
string extension = Path.GetExtension(inputFile);
FileStream outputFile = new FileStream(Path.GetDirectoryName(inputFile) + "\\" + baseFileName + "." + i.ToString().PadLeft(5, Convert.ToChar("0")) + extension + ".tmp", FileMode.Create, FileAccess.Write);
int bytesRead = 0;
byte[] buffer = new byte[sizeOfEachFile];
if ((bytesRead = fs.Read(buffer, 0, sizeOfEachFile)) > 0)
{
outputFile.Write(buffer, 0, bytesRead);
}
outputFile.Close();
}
fs.Close();
}
private void Merge300DividedbyLenthorSizeOfFile(string outPath)
{
//string outPath = txtInputFolder.Text; // Substitute this with your Input Folder
string[] tmpFiles = Directory.GetFiles(outPath, "*.tmp");
FileStream outputFile = null;
string prevFileName = "";
foreach (string tempFile in tmpFiles)
{
string fileName = Path.GetFileNameWithoutExtension(tempFile);
string baseFileName = fileName.Substring(0, fileName.IndexOf(Convert.ToChar(".")));
string extension = Path.GetExtension(fileName);
if (!prevFileName.Equals(baseFileName))
{
if (outputFile != null)
{
outputFile.Flush();
outputFile.Close();
}
outputFile = new FileStream(outPath + baseFileName + extension, FileMode.OpenOrCreate, FileAccess.Write);
}
int bytesRead = 0;
byte[] buffer = new byte[1024];
FileStream inputTempFile = new FileStream(tempFile, FileMode.OpenOrCreate, FileAccess.Read);
while ((bytesRead = inputTempFile.Read(buffer, 0, 1024)) > 0)
outputFile.Write(buffer, 0, bytesRead);
inputTempFile.Close();
File.Delete(tempFile);
prevFileName = baseFileName;
}
outputFile.Close();
}
private void btnMerge_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
//statusBar.Text = DateTime.Today;
FolderBrowserDialog dlg = new FolderBrowserDialog();
if (dlg.ShowDialog() == DialogResult.OK)
{
try
{
//pbxPhoto.Image = new Bitmap(dlg.OpenFile());
//_sPLITe = dlg.FileName;
_sPLITe = dlg.SelectedPath;
Merge300DividedbyLenthorSizeOfFile(_sPLITe);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
MessageBox.Show("Unable to load file: " + ex.Message);
}
}
}
}
}
<pre lang="vb">By
stylesmylez</pre>
|
|
|
|
|
Is there a question mixed in there somewhere?
Why is common sense not common?
Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level where they are an expert.
Sometimes it takes a lot of work to be lazy
Individuality is fine, as long as we do it together - F. Burns
|
|
|
|
|
what is that soposto mean??
That C# code is for those who want to create split file app jst copy n paste n modify put in buttons etc.
At one point i needed one so i put this out for those who where in my position!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
stylez500 wrote: i put this out for those who
Then write an article instead of posting code in forums where questions are asked...
Why is common sense not common?
Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level where they are an expert.
Sometimes it takes a lot of work to be lazy
Individuality is fine, as long as we do it together - F. Burns
|
|
|
|
|
It's "supposed". TXTSPEAK is heavily frowed upon here as it makes you look childish.
|
|
|
|
|
stylez500 wrote: That C# code is for those who want to create split file app jst copy n paste n
modify put in buttons etc.
At one point i needed one so i put this
out for those who where in my position!!!!!
OK, great. The problem you didn't consider is that the forums fill up so fast nobody will see your code by the end of next week because it'll be buried by a dozen pages of forum posts.
Yeah and don't think "Oh it'll still be visible because of Google." Think again. If everyone used Google people would be finding their own answers instead of relying on the regulars here to spoon-feed them answers.
|
|
|
|
|
It's just a shame that you ignored the tips and tricks, and articles sections where this would have ben much better received.
|
|
|
|
|
Homework? 
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair.
nils illegitimus carborundum
me, me, me
|
|
|
|
|
what is that soposto mean??
That C# code is for those who want to create split file app jst copy n paste n modify put in buttons etc.
At one point i needed one so i put this out for those who where in my position!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
If you look at the very first item in this forum, it says "How to ask a question". This forum is for asking questions. So when you post something like that, we are left wondering what the questions is. In any case, you could have been more clear by stating that you're not asking a question(which the purpose of the forum) but posting a solution to a problem you encountered. Nonetheless, thanks for sharing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
you right home work 4 your self
|
|
|
|
|
You won't last long here with that attitude.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Right now due to increasing our recruitment possibilities of new staff we are moving over to C#
What is the best way that I can go about making a data collection object available to all forms in C#
In Visual Basic we can use a module and put in a friend based variable i.e. friend GlobalData as string. (the string variable is the easiest way I could explain this as an example!) This then makes the variable available to any form / class in the assembly.
Is there a way of doing this in C# or do I have to look at passing the information back and forth between each form?
Many Thanks
Simon
Lobster Thermidor aux crevettes with a Mornay sauce, served in a Provençale manner with shallots and aubergines, garnished with truffle pate, brandy and a fried egg on top and Spam - Monty Python Spam Sketch
modified 17-Feb-12 11:50am.
|
|
|
|
|
All you need do is create a static property or member.
|
|
|
|
|
Always the simplest Thanks Pete
Lobster Thermidor aux crevettes with a Mornay sauce, served in a Provençale manner with shallots and aubergines, garnished with truffle pate, brandy and a fried egg on top and Spam - Monty Python Spam Sketch
|
|
|
|
|
A single static instance of a data storage class, probably. You could make the data storage class itself static but that makes it trickier to, for example, serialise it. Put this static instance somewhere that all classes have access to. For example
public class DataStore {
public int AwesomenessFactor;
public string Description;
public static DataStore Global = new DataStore();
}
And access it (from anywhere) with
DataStore.Global.(field)
Try to restrict the amount of global data you have, though. Global data is generally symptomatic of a poor design, because (by definition) it's coupled to everything, and excessive coupling is a maintenance problem.
|
|
|
|
|
The use of "Global" data is firstly limited to the search of a client, on a successful search it retrieves their insurance portfolio.
i.e. Search For me Simon Whale
it will return a list of all the quotes (this is restricted to a predefined date range) and live insurance policies that I have and its associated child objects only. This accommodates the archive strategy that management has made as a major requirement of the back office system.
BobJanova wrote: it's coupled to everything, and excessive coupling is a maintenance problem.
This is something that I have to fight / deal with the managements requests on the system design.
Lobster Thermidor aux crevettes with a Mornay sauce, served in a Provençale manner with shallots and aubergines, garnished with truffle pate, brandy and a fried egg on top and Spam - Monty Python Spam Sketch
|
|
|
|
|
Simon_Whale wrote: i.e. Search For me Simon Whale
it will return a list of all the quotes
This does imply to me that there is a back-end database here of all Customers, and you are querying it to retrieve a specific Customer's data.
In this context, the concerns Bob J. raises here about whether this is a multi-user access scenario, where threading may come into play, and where many users may be viewing the same Customer's data seem very salient. Who gets to change said data ? Who gets read-only permissions.
best, Bill
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool." Richard Feynman
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the response Bill.
I have taken into account the business logic of opening more than one client at a time.
My question at the time was what was the best way of passing this collection of client information through 1 to many different forms, which I knew that I was doing but not in the best way but with the moving towards c# was after how to do it in c# and BETTER.
Luc pointed my towards a more OO method of passing the data between forms by using properties
Thanks
Simon
Lobster Thermidor aux crevettes with a Mornay sauce, served in a Provençale manner with shallots and aubergines, garnished with truffle pate, brandy and a fried egg on top and Spam - Monty Python Spam Sketch
|
|
|
|
|
|
may be Global was the wrong term to use. What I am trying to do is at the beginning of the process load a client's insurance portfolio which could include multiple policies and or multiple properties and cars.
I then need to pass this through to various different forms in the main application and I am trying to find out to do this in C#
Lobster Thermidor aux crevettes with a Mornay sauce, served in a Provençale manner with shallots and aubergines, garnished with truffle pate, brandy and a fried egg on top and Spam - Monty Python Spam Sketch
|
|
|
|
|
I suggest you keep such data in a Customer object, then pass this object to each and every Form that needs it, with an explicit parameter in the Form's constructor, or through a dedicated public property. That is the OO way of doing things: provide what is needed where and when it is needed.
Making things global isn't a very good idea, as each and every code snippet now can access and modify such data, making the whole app less robust and harder to debug.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Luc!
I'll adopt that seeming its a rewrite as such!
Lobster Thermidor aux crevettes with a Mornay sauce, served in a Provençale manner with shallots and aubergines, garnished with truffle pate, brandy and a fried egg on top and Spam - Monty Python Spam Sketch
|
|
|
|
|
hi everyone I'm trying to not only make my cod emore readable but also reusable so i'm trying to rewrite the following bit of logic;
protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
clsDB = new clsDB();
GetSalesmanDesc();
if (!IsPostBack)
Populate_ddlCustomers();
}
public void GetSalesmanDesc()
{
salesmanList = new List<Salesman>();
try
{
salesmanList = new List<Salesman>();
con = new SqlConnection(strConnString);
SqlCommand com;
com = new SqlCommand();
com.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure;
com.CommandText = "GetSalesmanDesc";
com.CommandTimeout = 300;
com.Connection = con;
com.Connection.Open();
SqlDataReader reader = com.ExecuteReader();
while (reader.Read())
{
Salesman salesman = new Salesman();
salesman.SalesmanID = reader["SalesmanCode"] as String;
salesman.SalesmanName = reader["Salesman"] as String;
salesmanList.Add(salesman);
}
}
catch (System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException ex)
{
string msg = "Fetch Error:";
msg += ex.Message;
throw new Exception(msg);
}
finally
{
con.Close();
}
}
I would really like to try and keep the SQL actions separate from my main procedure so instead of the above I am tryign something like this:
public void GetSalesmanDesc()
{
salesmanList = new List<Salesman>();
clsDB.getSalesmanDesc();
}
the code in clsDB.getSalesmanDesc() is:
public bool getSalesmanDesc()
{
com = new SqlCommand();
com.CommandTimeout = 300;
com.CommandText = "GetSalesmanDesc";
com.Connection = sqlCon;
com.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure;
da.SelectCommand = com;
try
{
sqlCon.Open();
SqlDataReader reader = com.ExecuteReader();
while (reader.Read())
{
Salesman salesman = new Salesman();
salesman.SalesmanID = reader["SalesmanCode"] as String;
salesman.SalesmanName = reader["Salesman"] as String;
salesmanList.Add(salesman);
}
return true;
}
catch (System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException Sex)
{
strDBErrorMsg = Sex.Message;
return false;
}
catch (System.Exception Ex)
{
strDBErrorMsg = Ex.Message;
return false;
}
finally
{
DestroyDatasource();
}
}
Can anyone help me out please?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
