|
I think some of your post was truncated.
As a guess if you are suggesting that you want to return rows from two tables where there is no common columns between them then the answer is simple - use two queries.
|
|
|
|
|
If you are looking for records in table 1 where A,B,C records are not in table 2 then the following should help
Select * from table1 T
where not exists(Select * from Table2 TT where T.A = TT.A and T.B = TT.B and T.C = TT.C)
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Gr8 sir .. it worked .. you made my weekend  ... I wish you a wonderfull weekend.
|
|
|
|
|
Here is a strange result that I am getting with Oracle. Unless I wrap the select from TABLE1 as shown (specifying "rownum > 0"), the query never seems to complete. However, when it is included, it only takes a second or two.
It doesn't make any sense to me, because all that it seems to do is force Oracle to evaluate the nested select with the alias "a" before performing the join. I had thought that placing it in parenthesis would do that automatically. Perhaps the Oracle optimizer does something wonky that this compensates for..? Scratching my head here, because all that the "where" condition adds is basically saying "give me any rows that you find".
select COUNTRY_NAME, count(*) TALLY from
(
select * from (
select IP_SOURCE_NUM from TABLE1
where log_date between '01-JAN-2012' and date '01-FEB-2012'
and IP_SOURCE_NUM > 0
) where rownum > 0
) a
JOIN ip_geo b on b.ip_from =
(
select max(ip_from) as ip_from_match from ip_geo
where ip_from <= a.IP_SOURCE_NUM
)
group by COUNTRY_NAME
order by count(*) desc
|
|
|
|
|
While passing up the opportunity to make sarcasic remarks about a 'wonky' Oracle you might be better served by asking Tom[^] as it sounds like a rather deep and very specific Oracle issue.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
I think your link is broken.
|
|
|
|
|
As you already realized yourself, the paranthesis doesn't define in which order the query is executed, only what data the result is built from.
But by specifying Rownum > 0 you're forcing the optimizer to change the order of execution.
But I would use an optimizer hint instead. Like Select /* +materialize */ * from...
|
|
|
|
|
I suspected something like that was happening. I've never used optimizer hints before; I will look into that.
Thanks for the tip. 
|
|
|
|
|
What is the wrong in this query
insert into tbTasks_New( AssignedToId)
values('Employee')
where
Owner = 'Seema'
|
|
|
|
|
1. It isn't a query
2. An insert is an insert - 'where' doesn't apply (not for the form given.)
It is also possible that 'Employee' is not a valid value for 'AssignedToId'
|
|
|
|
|
By Owner do you mean the schema owner of the table? I don't think I've ever seen an insert statement with a 'where' clause before. 
Chris Meech
I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar]
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra]
posting about Crystal Reports here is like discussing gay marriage on a catholic church’s website.[Nishant Sivakumar]
|
|
|
|
|
As jschell said.
If Owner is a column in a table an insert might be like:
INSERT INTO tbTasks_New(AssignedToId)
SELECT column1
WHERE owner = 'Seema'
If you use the value command you cannot use the where (you do not need to!)
|
|
|
|
|
your queary is like this...
insert into tbTasks_New( AssignedToId)
values('Employee')
where
Owner = 'Seema'
and your solution will be like this...!
Update tbTasks_New set='Employee' where Owner='Seema'
-----------------------------------
Actually u have to use update statment insted of insert statment...! and then u will get ur expected output.!
Dnyanesh Wahiley....
|
|
|
|
|
I need to Find un identical rows from two table based on combination of 3 columns. Both table has same structure. Using SQL Server 2005
Ie Table1 and Table2 to has the columns Type,ID,Parent
1. Query the rows from Table1 which are not matching in Table2 with respect to columns Type,ID,Parent (ie. Need not required the rows which are matching combination of Type,ID,Parent in both table)
2. Query the rows from Table2 which are not matching in Table1 with respect to columns Type,ID,Parent (ie. Need not required the rows which are matching combination of Type,ID,Parent in both table)
Please help!!
|
|
|
|
|
Here's[^] some nice basic info about joins and how to do them. It even has pictures
|
|
|
|
|
Did you try to write query before you ask here? In your previous question you took good answers which are valid for your question which you are asking.
I Love T-SQL
"VB.NET is developed with C#.NET"
If my post helps you kindly save my time by voting my post.
|
|
|
|
|
hi
I have a table with this records(GroupId,ParentGroupId,GroupName).
i want to show a group with its full path, from main parent to it self
like this: red cherry: red cherry>>cherry>>fruit
i write a Procedure that give me its parents names,but i want to have a prosedure that append the parents name and give me one string
i want to do this for all records in that table
thanx for u answers
|
|
|
|
|
What you need is a common table expression[^] which is recursive processing of a table.
This may not be correct as your structure seems to be rigid (you know how many level to the top) and therefor you simply do a bunch of inner joins.
Select *
From Fruit
Inner join Category on Category.CategoryID = Fruit.CategoryID
Inner Join level2.ID = Category.Level2.ID
...
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Dear Experts,
I am using MS SQL server 2005. I want to Query the records that are not same in two different table.
ie., I have 2 different tables TABLE1, TABLE2 which are having same columns. (and most of the row are same)
Q1 : I want to query the records of TABLE2 which are not avaliable in TABLE1
Q2 : I want to query the records of TABLE1 which are not avaliable in TABLE2
Needless to compare the primay key.
Thanks in advance!!
|
|
|
|
|
SELECT a.*
FROM table1 a left outer join table2 b
ON a.id = b.id
WHERE b.id IS NULL
That will show you a list of records that are not in table2.
Lobster Thermidor aux crevettes with a Mornay sauce, served in a Provençale manner with shallots and aubergines, garnished with truffle pate, brandy and a fried egg on top and Spam - Monty Python Spam Sketch
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks a lot Simon_Whale
But if I have one then one criatria to compare incase I also have a.id2 = b.id2..please suggest
|
|
|
|
|
the ON is what joins the two tables together is the second condition is more to restrict the results then you would put that in the WHERE clause.
Lobster Thermidor aux crevettes with a Mornay sauce, served in a Provençale manner with shallots and aubergines, garnished with truffle pate, brandy and a fried egg on top and Spam - Monty Python Spam Sketch
|
|
|
|
|
Records of TABLE2 which are not avaliable in TABLE1
select * from table2 where ColumnName not in (select ColumnName from table1 )
TABLE1 which are not avaliable in TABLE2
select * from table1 where ColumnName not in (select ColumnName from table2 )
I Love T-SQL
"VB.NET is developed with C#.NET"
If my post helps you kindly save my time by voting my post.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
Is it possible to have 2 foreign keys that ae thesame in one table ?
Create table Product
(
productID int PK
)
Create table Category
(
CategoryID int PK ,
productID1 int fk references Product (productID) ,
productID2 int fk references Product (productID)
)
modified 31-Jan-12 6:30am.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
