|
Hi,
I dont know if the term routing and forwarding are similar such that after I use the following
command
ROUTE -p ADD 192.168.1.4 MASK 255.255.255.255 192 192,168.1.111
and I ping 192.168.1.4 I would get a reply from the <gateway> 192.168.1.111
any clarafication appreciated
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
See here[^] for some helpful information; found by our good friend Google.
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
the route command seems to take a IP address and point it to a gateway
If I want all traffic directed to 192.168.1.4 to be forwarded to 192.168.1.111 (192.168.1.111) is a IP on my laptop is route -p add 192.168.1.4 MASK 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.111 seems like the the proper command to do this
And if the commands takes how do I know its working
I assumed pinging 192.168.1.4
When I do that I get following message
Pinging 192.168.1.4 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 192.168.1.111: Destination host unreachable.
Reply from 192.168.1.111: Destination host unreachable.
Reply from 192.168.1.111: Destination host unreachable.
Reply from 192.168.1.111: Destination host unreachable.
Ping statistics for 192.168.1.4:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
|
|
|
|
|
ForNow wrote: the route command seems to take a IP address and point it to a gateway
That's exactly what is explained in the the link I posted above.
ForNow wrote: If I want all traffic directed to 192.168.1.4 to be forwarded to 192.168.1.111
That's not what the route command is for.
ForNow wrote: Reply from 192.168.1.111: Destination host unreachable.
Exactly, because you have not created a route to the destination.
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
So how would I route 192.168.1.4 traffic to 192.168.1.111 192.168.1.111 (being the IP on my laptop 192.168.1.1 being the gateway)
I thought the command route -p ADD 192.168.1.4 MASK 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.111
does that
|
|
|
|
|
No, the route command tells the network layer how to get from a source IP address to a destination, by giving the address of a gateway. It does not reroute all messages destined for an IP address and send them somewhere different.
ForNow wrote: I thought the command route -p ADD 192.168.1.4 MASK 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.111 does that
In your example above you are saying that the route to destination address 192.168.1.4 can be found by sending messages through the gateway at address 192.168.1.111. The gateway machine is a message forwarder, not an alternative endpoint.
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
In other words the gateway for 192.168.1.111
Which in my case is 192.168.1.1. Would be the gateway address for
192.168.1.4
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, I don't understand what you are saying here.
What it comes down to is that you cannot change the destination IP address by means of the route command.
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
How to force HTTPS for IIS 6 and 7 without making changes to the application source (config)?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
It's my first experience looking for Linux web hosting and the client will pay annual fees instead of monthly that's why I don't wantt to disappoint him when he finds the web hosting bad after few months..
can any one recommend a good features' and customer services' web host?
Thanks,
Jassim
|
|
|
|
|
Try bigrock.in
Apurv
If Java had true garbage collection, most programs would delete themselves upon execution.
|
|
|
|
|
A huge california legislation for nurse safety and protection (AB 1136 Legislation) passed on Friday (oct 7) and suddenly we need to host multiple info feeds for all the new law and legislation content...and there is a ton! What are the best hosting options / services for this type of thing? I am the sole webmaster and really have no experience with RSS, etc. . .
|
|
|
|
|
I've become unhappy with the reliablity of my current shell provider, and am looking to switch. To keep the billing hassle down as much as possible I'd like to go with a single company for both services; but finding one is difficult since most inexpensive shell providers don't appear to've upgraded their web hosting servers for several years with the result that they have pitifully small storage limits.
I'm not looking for anything particularly fancy. On the shell side just some sort of linux/bsd I can run a bnc process on (not an IRCd) with a vanity host. Currently I'm running psybnc; and would like to give ZNC a try because it can play back messages sent while I was disconnected but with my limited *nix skills probably won't take the effort unless there's an easy script provided to do the initial source download and compile steps for me. My web hosting use could be best described as an http file dump that I mostly use to share high quality pictures and other random stuff with friends. I don't have anything resembling a CMS (making it run sounds like work) or any serverside scripting/databases in use; all I really want/need is a few GB of storage on my domain that I can use to toss people URLs to. I really don't care what's running on the backend; but lamp hosting more or less wins by default from a cost perspective.
I know it's a bit off the beaten trail for the average CP user; but if anyone here has any useful suggestions I'd appreciate them.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
i have hosted in hosting murah pulauweb for about 3 months.. i want to host my java application with my account.. How do i know if their server is support java application or not? i tried several ways to run my java application but still won't work!
this frustating me so much, even their services are good and famous enought in my country, but i still dont know how to know they are support java or not. Please help me to figure out how to know if theis hosting support java or not. thanks
|
|
|
|
|
ade adwitya wrote: but i still dont know how to know they are support java or not.
Did you ask them?
|
|
|
|
|
I think its a spam. Check his profile. I'm including his account on the list of spams.
Signature construction in progress. Sorry for the inconvenience.
|
|
|
|
|
You may be right, given that his profile claims he is CTO at this company.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think it is spam. Either cluelessness runs to the top; or he's the only theoretical techie at his place of employment and is suffering from title inflation.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
I think it surely is.
Why would he ask us if the company he is the CEO of provides such or such feature ?
Clearly he's trying to make people come to his site.
|
|
|
|
|
Can anyone explain me user experience with hosting on Arvixe? Is arvixe.com good idea to buy hosting there?
I Love T-SQL
"VB.NET is developed with C#.NET"
If my post helps you kindly save my time by voting my post.
www.cacttus.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all
Iam A Php Developer I Wish To Develop a website for live video streaming and video uploading and downloading just like www.freeonsmash.com[^]
I Want to know which kind of server i purchase what are the server requirements
Please Help me to know this
Thank you
Arunkumar.T
Put the tools back when you''re done with them.
|
|
|
|
|
HI friends,
I have a web application written using .Net framework 3.5. The applications runs good when running under visual studio. I have installed it on my local machine. Just to be able to host my many applications I have assigned Host name to my application: www.crm_web.com and then in the hosts file in the C:\Windows\System32\drivers\etc directory on my local machine I have included
127.0.0.1 www.crm_web.com which tells the system to look into the system itself for the crm_web.com host name. This all is fine.
Now when through my browser on my local machine I write www.crm_web.com and access the website it runs fine. But when I try to do the same thing using www.crm_web.com/default.aspx the applications doesn't runs properly at all. Infact I am even not able to login into the site. (Default.aspx is a login page and the start up page.) For me it is very necessary that I am able to properly access the website through www.crm_web.com/default.aspx also coz I need to add querystring parameters to this URL. e.g www.crm_web.com/default.aspx?name='gaurav'
Looking forward for some help.
Thanks and Regards,
Gaurav
|
|
|
|
|
I'm trying to understand this stuff:
If I have a URL of 'www.mywidgets.com/smallwidgets', then smallwidgets is a subdirectory under the domain www.mywidgets.com. Is that correct? The 'smallwidgets' subdirectory is part of the www.mywidgets.com website. Is that correct? Can 'smallwidgets' be a separate website with it's own domain name and widget database and processing logic and etc?
If I have a URL of 'www.mywidgets.smallwidgets.com', then smallwidgets is a subdomain of www.mywidgets.com. Is that correct? In this case, is smallwidgets a separate website? Can it be a separate web site with its own database/logic/etc if I have a domain name of www.smallwidgets.com and point it to www.mywidgets.smallwidgets.com?
Do these questions make sense or am I still too confused to ask coherent questions?
The reason I'm asking is I'm a hobby developer (C#, winforms) with a small business selling collectible stamps. I want a web presence (besides eBay), to expand the business and to expand my knowledge of web development. My budget is as close to zero cost as I can make it. I want (I think) at least two independent 'websites', say www.mystore.com for the public and www.mydevelopmentstore.com for just me, each with it's own SQL database. I'm having a terrible time figuring out what hosting I need to buy. It's obvious to me that if I buy two separate hosting plans I can do what I want, but I'm trying to figure out if I can get away with just one.
|
|
|
|
|
The URI is constructed as : <scheme name> : <hierarchical part> [ ? <query> ] [ # <fragment> ]; see here[^].
In your example The domain is mywidgets.com with the server called www.
Everything after the slash - smallwidgets - must be served up by the web-site and that becomes implementation specific. You can use redirects to different sites without exposing it outside.
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done.
Drink. Get drunk. Fall over - P O'H
OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre
I cannot live by bread alone. Bacon and ketchup are needed as well. - Trollslayer
Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb - they're often *students*, for heaven's sake - Terry Pratchett
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
