|
...to the suggestion that once a question has been answered (and that answer hasn't itself been deleted), the question itself could not be deleted.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
Last word of last line in this thread[^] at Lounge. I tried the same in a blank message-preview but failed(f***). Then how could be there? 
EDIT
----------
Answered by Luc & JSOP
modified 7-Nov-11 13:23pm.
|
|
|
|
|
If you need to learn how to swear properly, start using CTRL/U. 
|
|
|
|
|
Yep, I didn't know that 
|
|
|
|
|
No, it's not broken - it's just trivial to circumvent.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
I didn't know this. Modified the thread.
|
|
|
|
|
It's quite frustrating to get a 1-vote on a perfectly good answer. Or what I believe to be perfectly good.
If I get a 1-vote I want to at least know why I deserved it. I can live with 1-votes in the lounge. But in QA I might've actually given a wrong answer. I don't care about the 1-vote, but I would at least like to be corrected so I will not make the same mistake in the future.
That said, making comments mandatory on downvotes in QA might keep the malicious univoters from actually univoting.
A downvote without clarification on a good answer might also fool the OP who will believe your answer is no good (while it actually is).
I think mandatory comments on downvotes in QA is a win-win-win-win situation 
It's an OO world.
public class Naerling : Lazy<Person>{
public void DoWork(){ throw new NotImplementedException(); }
}
|
|
|
|
|
There are people in all walks of life who have nothing better to do; ignore them and move on. The people who matter on CodeProject will judge you by your actions (i.e. answers and comments) rather than by your reputation graph.
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
well said.
Just along for the ride.
"the meat from that butcher is just the dogs danglies, absolutely amazing cuts of beef." - DaveAuld (2011)
"No, that is just the earthly manifestation of the Great God Retardon." - Nagy Vilmos (2011)
|
|
|
|
|
Well, that's true. It's not really my rep I'm worried about though.
Every vote should be justified. An upvote speaks for itself, a downvote does not.
But you're probably right. Just ignore the univoting a-holes. All good univoters I know always leave a reason anyway
It's an OO world.
public class Naerling : Lazy<Person>{
public void DoWork(){ throw new NotImplementedException(); }
}
|
|
|
|
|
That doens't mean the reputation system shouldn't be mended in that area (i.e., force comments for downvotes).
Somebody in an online forum wrote: INTJs never really joke. They make a point. The joke is just a gift wrapper.
|
|
|
|
|
I think there are more important things to worry about.
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
There are more important things to worry about than the entire reputation system, yet it still exists.
Somebody in an online forum wrote: INTJs never really joke. They make a point. The joke is just a gift wrapper.
|
|
|
|
|
AspDotNetDev wrote: yet it still exists
And I'm more than happy with that; after all it got me MVP status. All I'm saying is that a few 1-votes from people who rarely if ever make a serious contribution to the site is too irrelevant to worry about.
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: The people who matter on CodeProject will judge you by your actions (i.e. answers and comments) rather than by your reputation graph.
Well said Richard, I agree 
|
|
|
|
|
I've complained about it, too. If you delete it, and then re-post it, the down-vote goes away.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the tip
It's still annoying though.
It's an OO world.
public class Naerling : Lazy<Person>{
public void DoWork(){ throw new NotImplementedException(); }
}
|
|
|
|
|
Only the key is loading; not the graph.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Your graph loads fine for me.
Oxfords English < Official CCC Players Dictionary
Excuse me for my improper grammar and typos.
It's because English is my primary language, not my first language.
My first languages are C# and Java.
VB, ASP, JS, PHP and SQL are my second language.
Indonesian came as my third language.
My fourth language? I'm still creating it, I'll let you know when it's done!
|
|
|
|
|
It seems to be working now, but was faceplanting earlier.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
IMO the rep graph stuff doesn't scale well, and the time-out value is way too small to cope with the higher than average activity of some members; I haven't gotten my rep graph first time for many months now, whether day or night. The only thing that works is perseverance, requesting the graph over and over until it finally shows up, which probably only happens when all relevant events happen to be in the system caches at the same time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The count of views increments by 1 on navigating to any of the tabs ( Browse code, stats, revisions, articles) of the same article.
if user visits an article then it should be counted as a single visit only if he navigates to tabs of the same article. Here it gets incremented by 1.
|
|
|
|
|
I had posted some questions in Quick Answers -> Ask a Question
i had got satisfactory answers . some time back i marked as 'deleted' some of the questions . now The questions are still there but without the Solutions. Now I need some of the solutions suggested by the experts. Can anyone suggest me how to retrieve the Solutions for the questions marked as deleted ??
|
|
|
|
|
ulhas wrote: some time back i marked as 'deleted' some of the questions
Did you delete the questions or did somebody else?
Somebody in an online forum wrote: INTJs never really joke. They make a point. The joke is just a gift wrapper.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
