Click here to Skip to main content
15,894,343 members
Articles / Programming Languages / C++11
Tip/Trick

Removing Ugly Flags in C++

Rate me:
Please Sign up or sign in to vote.
4.00/5 (13 votes)
18 Oct 2011CPOL 64K   6   29
Using the Call Gate idiom to reduce number of boolean flags and state variables.
Let's consider a typical use case.

C++
struct car
{
  car()
    :started_(false)
  {
  }
  ~car()
  {
    stop();
  }

  void start()
  {
    if(started_)
       return;
    do_start();
    started_=true;
  }
  void stop()
  {
    if(!started_)
       return;
    do_stop();
    started_=false;
  }
private:
  bool started_;

  // do actual work
  void do_start();
  void do_stop();
};

Doesn't the 'started_' flag look ugly? It does to me. With the Call Gate idiom, that could be changed to:

C++
struct car
{
  car()
    :start_( boost::bind(&car::do_play, get_this()) )
    ,stop_( boost::bind(&car::do_stop, get_this()) )
  {
    //wire the gates
    start_.wire_on(stop_); //'start' opens the 'stop' gate
    stop_.wire_on(start_); //'stop' opens the 'start' gate
  }
  ~car()
  {
    stop();
  }

  void start()
  {
    start_();
  }
  void stop()
  {
    stop_();
  }

private:
  gate start_;
  gate stop_;

  car* get_this() { return this; }

  // do actual work
  void do_start();
  void do_stop();
};


Replacing only one bool with call gates is probably an overkill, but there is a more interesting sample in Call Gate Idiom, and an actual implementation of the call gates.

License

This article, along with any associated source code and files, is licensed under The Code Project Open License (CPOL)


Written By
United States United States
This member has not yet provided a Biography. Assume it's interesting and varied, and probably something to do with programming.

Comments and Discussions

 
GeneralReason for my vote of 2 What looks ugly to me in the first p... Pin
nv314-Dec-11 4:16
nv314-Dec-11 4:16 
GeneralMy vote of 5: It is a nice way to hide the annoying state ca... Pin
semmel7125-Oct-11 2:06
semmel7125-Oct-11 2:06 
GeneralReason for my vote of 5 Nice! It centralizes the setup of th... Pin
semmel7125-Oct-11 2:02
semmel7125-Oct-11 2:02 
GeneralReason for my vote of 1 Why make it simple when you can make... Pin
YvesDaoust24-Oct-11 23:01
YvesDaoust24-Oct-11 23:01 
GeneralReason for my vote of 3 Replacing ugly Code with bloated ugl... Pin
Johann Anhofer24-Oct-11 10:01
Johann Anhofer24-Oct-11 10:01 
GeneralReason for my vote of 1 The article is way too short to expl... Pin
Wolfgang_Baron18-Oct-11 13:18
professionalWolfgang_Baron18-Oct-11 13:18 
GeneralFor a more complex example, please see the player type at th... Pin
egladysh18-Oct-11 7:06
egladysh18-Oct-11 7:06 
GeneralReason for my vote of 2 No practical application comes easil... Pin
xelous218-Oct-11 3:29
xelous218-Oct-11 3:29 
GeneralReason for my vote of 4 Interesting subject, would love to s... Pin
Julien Villers17-Oct-11 22:32
professionalJulien Villers17-Oct-11 22:32 
GeneralReason for my vote of 4 An interesting idiom. Pin
Jon Summers17-Oct-11 9:33
Jon Summers17-Oct-11 9:33 
QuestionWhy replace an ugly flag with two more ugly objects at the cost of functionality and maintainability? Pin
Stefan_Lang18-Oct-11 3:54
Stefan_Lang18-Oct-11 3:54 
AnswerRe: Why replace an ugly flag with two more ugly objects at the cost of functionality and maintainability? Pin
egladysh18-Oct-11 7:40
egladysh18-Oct-11 7:40 
GeneralRe: Why replace an ugly flag with two more ugly objects at the cost of functionality and maintainability? Pin
Stefan_Lang18-Oct-11 23:26
Stefan_Lang18-Oct-11 23:26 
1. But your knob (or gate now) is not a two-state object, at least not visibly so, even though it's implemented as such. For anyone looking at the API your class may be stateless, have 2 or 5 or 397 states, or an indefinite number of internal states (i. e. analogue).

I'm not sure what meaning you had in mind after renaming your class to 'gate'. Doesn't make any sense to me either, sorry.

After looking at your more detailed example off-site I think what you are really trying to implement is some kind of generic state-machine, where each class represents one particular state of one particular object. So 'state' might in fact be a good name for your class.

2. You misunderstood my question. My point was that the original code did have an obvious state, i. e. running or stopped, depending on your 'ugly' flag. Your new version doesn't provide that information any more, so you lost this information!

4. That more complex example throws a somewhat more favorable light on your idea - it would have been better to provide that here right from the start.

5. See 4.! Your whole premise on this site was to replace one boolean flag with something else. Without a more generic example it's hard to see the sense in that.

6. Now you finally named your baby, if I might say so! Wink | ;) Yes, indeed, this is really all about state variables, and your 'wire' in truth is just a transition between states. The whole concept is about state machines, not just mere boolean flags! Now look at your code again and choose proper names and examples and you're good! Smile | :)
GeneralRe: Why replace an ugly flag with two more ugly objects at the cost of functionality and maintainability? Pin
xelous219-Oct-11 0:12
xelous219-Oct-11 0:12 
GeneralRe: Why replace an ugly flag with two more ugly objects at the cost of functionality and maintainability? Pin
egladysh19-Oct-11 7:54
egladysh19-Oct-11 7:54 
GeneralRe: Why replace an ugly flag with two more ugly objects at the cost of functionality and maintainability? Pin
Stefan_Lang19-Oct-11 22:49
Stefan_Lang19-Oct-11 22:49 
GeneralRe: Why replace an ugly flag with two more ugly objects at the cost of functionality and maintainability? Pin
egladysh20-Oct-11 6:50
egladysh20-Oct-11 6:50 
GeneralRe: Why replace an ugly flag with two more ugly objects at the cost of functionality and maintainability? Pin
Stefan_Lang21-Oct-11 0:40
Stefan_Lang21-Oct-11 0:40 
GeneralRe: Why replace an ugly flag with two more ugly objects at the cost of functionality and maintainability? Pin
egladysh21-Oct-11 6:38
egladysh21-Oct-11 6:38 
GeneralRe: Why replace an ugly flag with two more ugly objects at the cost of functionality and maintainability? Pin
Stefan_Lang25-Oct-11 4:59
Stefan_Lang25-Oct-11 4:59 
GeneralRe: Why replace an ugly flag with two more ugly objects at the cost of functionality and maintainability? Pin
egladysh25-Oct-11 5:41
egladysh25-Oct-11 5:41 
GeneralRe: Why replace an ugly flag with two more ugly objects at the cost of functionality and maintainability? Pin
Stefan_Lang25-Oct-11 5:58
Stefan_Lang25-Oct-11 5:58 
GeneralRe: Why replace an ugly flag with two more ugly objects at the cost of functionality and maintainability? Pin
egladysh25-Oct-11 7:01
egladysh25-Oct-11 7:01 
GeneralFeedback Mechanism Absent Pin
xelous218-Oct-11 3:26
xelous218-Oct-11 3:26 
GeneralRe: Feedback Mechanism Absent Pin
egladysh18-Oct-11 7:50
egladysh18-Oct-11 7:50 

General General    News News    Suggestion Suggestion    Question Question    Bug Bug    Answer Answer    Joke Joke    Praise Praise    Rant Rant    Admin Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.