|
|
Given that the Total Rep will usually overwhelm the graph given it is a total of the individual cats, how about moving the total rep to the right (secondary axis) (and possibly change its style to filled area, so it sits behind the lines for the main cats).
Just an idea.
|
|
|
|
|
DaveAuld wrote: Total Rep will usually overwhelm
you are also considering the people with a significant negative rep component I see. 
The official answer is likely to contain the keywords ODATA, Pete, SilverLight, todo, in some order.
BTW: I made the same suggestion back when rep graphs came into existence.
Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
The quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get. Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they improve readability. CP Vanity has been updated to V2.3
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: you are also considering the people with a significant negative rep component I see.
I try my best to ensure anything fits across the widest possible data envelope 
Yeh, I remember a post previovlu that pete was looking into something in his spare time, but thought that could maybe make a quick change to the current chart generator script.
After all the rep numbers are getting bigger all the time..........
Luc Pattyn wrote: BTW: I made the same suggestion back when rep graphs came into existence.
sorry, didn't know that.
p.s. any whispers on a web service yet
|
|
|
|
|
We have a very basic webservice built for the Silverlight graph project, but I'm not officially releasing it until we've had a chance to fully test it. Pete has a life and if a member offers help I should wait until they have the time rather than bothering hassling them about it.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Cheers Chris,
I wasn't suggesting for a minute that anybody should be hassled for volunteered services...
No chance of tweaking the existing one, to shift the total to a secondary axis in the meantime?
|
|
|
|
|
Here is another idea that probably would solve Dave's problem while being extremely easy to implement: also provide the current rep graph without the total rep, maybe on a different tab, maybe when control-clicking the Graph tab. Without the total, the vertical scale typically would expand (a factor of 2 for Dave's) and give a better view of the individual components.
Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
The quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get. Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they improve readability. CP Vanity has been updated to V2.3
|
|
|
|
|
Chris - I've done some work on this, but we have an issue when a member selects a long timeframe for their membership details. The amount of data explodes, and the RIA services has a memory leak in it. Over a period of time, this would cause a lot of problems.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Dave, I just added a little zoom functionality to CP Vanity; it isn't perfect as it is based on the graph we know, but it might be good enough for now.
Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
The quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get. Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they improve readability. CP Vanity has been updated to V2.4
|
|
|
|
|
I saw this article come through the news feed
clickety[^]
I thought hey that's cool, maybe a future employer will google my name and find a list of things I've written all across the web (for now it's just at CodeProject). I took a look at the source of one of my articles and was a little shocked to find that The Code Project claims authorship of my article
<meta name="Author" content="The Code Project" >
Fix please.
|
|
|
|
|
Jeremy Hutchinson wrote: Fix please.
You want neutering? That's a bit extreme.
|
|
|
|
|
Then the problem wouldn't reproduce
|
|
|
|
|
I've made the fix and will have the new code (if all goes well) uploaded today.
My apologies for this!
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Awesomely fast response. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
I really feel the author of this article is copying and pasting code from other outside sources without any citations or proper references. I think this author has been dealt with before (last couple of days). Maybe one of the hampsters can show this person to the path of enlightenment.
The entire first sentence right under the heading "Variance" comes from a book on Google books.
Article in question.
c# 4.0 new features[^]
Sorry if I am out of line here.
[Edit] POH found the entire article on a China website (see below). Interesting.
--
** Jack of all trades and master of none.
modified on Wednesday, June 8, 2011 7:17 AM
|
|
|
|
|
In attempting to find this reference, I came across this site[^].
|
|
|
|
|
I'm speechless. Quite sad actually.
--
** Jack of all trades and master of none.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also I checked this but the publish dates for these two are same, so Ignored to post it here.
But not sure that blog is author's or not..
|
|
|
|
|
The plot is thick on this one. Taking a closer look at that Chinese website.
As for the author, I've reached out to offer guidance.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
"Generic DataGridView V2.0"
http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?aid=14674&av=18532
Unfortunately link for download source files is wrong.
It pointed to the same files from previous version (with BUGs)
http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?aid=14674&av=42646
Please solve this.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
1.
you could post a message in the article's forum; that way the author would get a mail notification.
Not sure it would help in this particular case as he hasn't been active here for almost two years it seems.
2.
CodeProject does not keep versions for images, downloads, etc; it only versions the article text itself. So if the ZIP name in both article versions is the same, then both would now point to the same ZIP (which could be the original one, or a more recent one, not sure, the file dates seem pretty old).
3.
There is something strange about the dates anyway: the article's revision 2 is older than revision 1!
Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
The quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get. Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they improve readability. CP Vanity has been updated to V2.3
|
|
|
|
|
Also, how come when I click on the Shield of Protectiveness that it gives me a "page not found"? How did Heath Stewart become the PROTECTOR? Inquiring minds want to know.
--
** Jack of all trades and master of none.
|
|
|
|
|
I found this in Membership type[^] page.
The Code Project Protector
These dedicated members help ensure that a million members sending hundreds of articles each week do the right thing. They can moderate and remove inappropriate articles, edit eye-straining formatting and move under-performing (or recovering) articles to and from Purgatory. If you see an article that needs attention then let these guys know. Spot them in the forums by their protectors icon *protector*.
|
|
|
|
|
So they are protectors of truth, decency, high morals, and illegal font styles. I want one of those shields. Where do I sign?
--
** Jack of all trades and master of none.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
