|
They are good posts though.
|
|
|
|
|
It would, at least for me. 
It's a member which sporadically interacts with the community.
Cheers, Jani Giannoudis
|
|
|
|
|
rep numbers page and graph are disagreeing again on Author points, 25 is the difference at the moment. Probably still a bug in download rewarding. FWIW: only one download event in history for the last 6 hours, so shouldn't be a cache issue.
Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
The quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get. Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they improve readability. CP Vanity has been updated to V2.3
|
|
|
|
|
The difference has increased to 35 now. My best guess is a ZIP download gets entered once in the rep history, counted once (5 Author) in the numeric rep, and sometimes gets counted twice in the graph (double-GET filter not working reliably?).
Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
The quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get. Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they improve readability. CP Vanity has been updated to V2.3
|
|
|
|
|
This is probably a known issue, so I apologize if this is a repost.
I have noticed that whenever I post a comment to an Article, Tip/Trick, etc... the page does not refresh and all I see is my comment and no one else's comments. I have to get off the page go to the Home tab and click on the article again to see everything.
Ctrl+F5 does not seem to work, it just refreshes the same page view.
FF 4.0.1
XP SP3
-- Thanks
--
** You don't hire a handyman to build a house, you hire a carpenter.
** Jack of all trades and master of none.
|
|
|
|
|
Comment posting is all done via Ajax, so yes, no page refresh.
If someone posted a comment on the question, tip or answer you are commenting on then you'll see the other comments after you post, but not for other items on the page.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for getting back to me on this. 
-----------------------------
Just along for the ride.
-----------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
1) Reporting a pending for being the wrong type..........success
2) Vote message on pending article saying wrong type results in a 'Failed!' message in red in the voting area of the message. The page then redirects to the C# article listing page 
3) Navigate to the Home page
4) Re-enter the Pending article
5) Try to vote on said message again in #2
6) 'Failed' message appears again, and page redirects to the C# article listing.
7) give up, and go back to my can of IRN-BRU for breakfast..............
|
|
|
|
|
This issue should be fixed now.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, someone posted some HTML in the .NET Framework forum that screwed up the page...again.
|
|
|
|
|
It might be this user's[^] signature perhaps. His response to a question is the final one that I see until I open up his post. Everything else then shows up really odd as part of his post.
Chris Meech
I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar]
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra]
posting about Crystal Reports here is like discussing gay marriage on a catholic church’s website.[Nishant Sivakumar]
|
|
|
|
|
They had used '<' in the message with 'Use HTML in this post' checked.
|
|
|
|
|
Planning to allow saving more than 5 "interest" filters in the future? Considering the large number of filter selections there already are, makes sense to allow users to save more than 5 filters when looking through Q&A.
|
|
|
|
|
The most useful feature (for me) of the Bookmarks feature would be the ability sort my list of bookmarks in reverse chrono order (i.e. most recently bookmarked first). This would make the feature infinitely (or at least 17.5492E+892301 times) more useful.
Thanks,
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, that would explain it! It was the author's error in this[^] post.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
The original link (http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/list_articles.asp?userid=441940) now redirects correctly.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is what I got when I tried to 5 vote a post today. I am signed in and did not have problem voting before. How did I become "uncomfirmed"?
|
|
|
|
|
If you click on the link that's presented then the "confirm" page explains it. Essentially, email addresses go stale and we are doing our best to
a) ensure we don't send emails to those who are no longer interested or active, and
b) make it harder and more annoying to create sock puppets solely for the point of downvoting.
We have also restricted access to the Soapbox and backroom [so that write access is only available] to those with confirmed emails. We don't police those forums so there must be a level of personal accountability.
[Edit: added clarification]
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
modified on Saturday, June 4, 2011 8:41 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks.
P.S. Trying vote 5 on your reply, got "You must have a confirmed email address to vote". 
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: We have also restricted access to the Soapbox and backroom to those with confirmed emails.
Restricted access for those with confirmed emails. WTF???
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry - I'm not sure which part of that is confusing.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
No it does not mean "restricted access", it means that access is restricted to only members with confirmed email. Stupid English language 
The best things in life are not things.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
