|
It requires a tcp protocol redirection, which you can achieve with a degree of network packet analyization dissassembly. Further packet reassembly will be required to redirect the packet to its final route.
|
|
|
|
|
All proxy websites are filtered also 
|
|
|
|
|
All of them? Surely some managed to slip through their net - especially private ones
|
|
|
|
|
Do you recommend a private one?
|
|
|
|
|
Not any one in particular, I don't trust them. But why not set up your home pc up as a private proxy server?
|
|
|
|
|
Rajesh has a good point there: If you do succeed in bypassing filtration and access information that you are supposed to be prevented from doing, there is a very good chance that your employer will be annoyed with you, and (depending on company policy) you could well loose your job: I have worked for companies where people have been sacked for browsing the wrong sites!
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."
|
|
|
|
|
I only want to open an instant messenging site which is block
|
|
|
|
|
If your company has it blocked, think of it as unavailable. To do otherwise is against company policy (or they wouldn't have blocked it in the first place), and will get you a telling off at the very least when they catch you!
Sorry!
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: I have worked for companies where people have been sacked for browsing the wrong sites! I was once fired for watching pr0n at work
"Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.
|
|
|
|
|
No need to Expose anyone here and show the obvious 
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry to disappoint you: I found out the the General Manager was watching pr0n at work, via logs, and brought it to the attention of his direct boss, and mine - the company owner.
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."
|
|
|
|
|
I hate such people. I hope that you deleted the downloaded pr0n content from his machine after secretly copying it to your portable drive!
"Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.
|
|
|
|
|
No, I copied his entire PC to archive so it could be used as evidence if necessary.
And then had the worst day of my life looking at every single image, video, and cached web page to check what kind of stuff he was watching. The MD wanted to know if any of it was child related, so it all had to be checked by a human being.
Not an experience I ever want to repeat, thank you!
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: And then had the worst day of my life looking at every single image, video, and cached web page to check what kind of stuff he was watching. The MD wanted to know if any of it was child related, so it all had to be checked by a human being.
Shyte! That is sick, and I'm sorry for you. 
"Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.
|
|
|
|
|
No problem - long time ago!
But not something you can delegate, unfortunately...
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."
|
|
|
|
|
There are a few tips and tricks to seeing some content, but WebSense is an absolute barsteward to get around in the most part, and as many others have said trying to hard or succeeding could mean the end of employment.
We have it here and the worst of it is I believe my father did a presentation of it to my current employers that led to them taking it on (he worked for another organisation that used it).
Every man can tell how many goats or sheep he possesses, but not how many friends.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have a small DLL containing classes used by applications that I have developed at home under Windows 32 bit, and it has worked fine through Windows XP, Vista, and 7. I recently bought a new PC with 64 bit Windows 7 installed and duly added all my own stuff as normal. However, now when I try to run any of my apps I get a pop-up which says:
The program can't start because kandr32d.dll is missing from your computer. Try reinstalling the program to fix this problem.
Now, I know the dll is installed as I can see it in a command prompt window thus:
C:\Windows\System32>dir kandr32d.dll
Volume in drive C is System
Volume Serial Number is F28F-2710
Directory of C:\Windows\System32
04/05/2011 20:28 78,336 kandr32d.dll
1 File(s) 78,336 bytes
0 Dir(s) 212,344,786,944 bytes free
I also know that the dll runs successfully since, if I put it in the same directory as the executable file, then it works with no problems.
I have never needed to register dlls like this in the past but am wondering if there is some extra requirement in 64 bit that I am not aware of; I could find no suggestions from Google.
Anyone else seen anything similar?
The best things in life are not things.
|
|
|
|
|
As with everything Microsoft the answer is so simple:
32 bit DLLs need to be placed into Windows\SysWOW64 rather than Windows\System32.
So obvious really.
The best things in life are not things.
|
|
|
|
|
yes, it is obvious once you remember this is Microsoft picking the names.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, improve readability, and make me actually look at the code.
|
|
|
|
|
I just love the idea that a folder with '32' in the name is for 64 bit stuff, and a folder with 64 in the name is for 32 bit stuff. Of course, it may be more subtle than that.
The best things in life are not things.
|
|
|
|
|
Having found the answer I Googled SYSWoW64 and found some interesting facts; apparently SysWOW64 is an abbreviation of "SYStem32 Windows On Windows 64. As my boss used to say, "Go figure"!
The best things in life are not things.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello all,
Everything worked some days ago...
Environment:
* 2x "windows 7 ultimate SP1" computers.
* Both computers can connect different computers out there with windows XP.
* Both computers can share files using shared folders.
* Both computers can't connect to each other using remote desktop.
* Both computers have the same users.
* Both computers don't show the options:
** Don't allow connections to this computer.
** Allow connections from computers running any version of Remote Desktop (less secure).
** Allow connections only from computers running Remote Desktop with Network Level Authentication (more secure).
** Select users button.
*** see a picture that I've found in the Internet that shows the options page as it is now: http://xkcd.nl/dCW/s-7726c49edb27[^].
* the same result with the firewall and antivirus completely disabled.
* No domain involved.
Question:
What could you suggest me to get this working?
Thank you in advance pals... 
|
|
|
|
|
Is it a "Home" version of Windows 7 running on those computers? Home versions cannot be connected to via RDP.
If not, are they computers in a domain? Then check group policies.
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate versions.
And no, there is not a domain there...
Thank you!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
