|
For built in pointer types, there is no difference. I'd say using -> will make you code look more like users are used to, so I would recommend that. Your compiler would also not make any difference. Dereference and pointer operators can however be overloaded, but only someone insane would make an implementation that broke the intuitive functionality.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Niklas I will use ->
What do u mean by built-in pointers? what are others?
|
|
|
|
|
I was talking about pointer types.
You can mimic pointer behavior by overloading the pointer operator:
class A
{
public:
int intValue;
};
class B
{
A myA;
public:
A* operator->() { return &myA; }
};
B b;
cout << b->intValue << endl;
Here, b is not a pointer, but can be used as such.
But of course, then all bets are off since it will yield a function call, which may contain whatever.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since objectName is a pointer, you must use ->.
There is no advantage in first dereferencing it with * and then using the . operator.
|
|
|
|
|
|
HI Guys,
I am using visual studio 2010 and I need to change the Mainframe icon at runtime based on my requirement so I have defined a macro _CHANGEICO. If this macro is defined I need to use some different icon and so I modified the .rc file accordingly and saved. Now If add any string or any new item to the resource all my macro declaration is deleted from the .rc file.
For example I have tried the following i.e. modified the resource file like this
#if defined(_CHANGEICO)
IDR_MAINFRAME ICON "res\\Orbit.ico"
#else
IDR_MAINFRAME ICON "res\\Sun.ico"
#endif
(OR)
#ifdef _CHANGEICO
IDR_MAINFRAME ICON "res\\Orbit.ico"
#else
IDR_MAINFRAME ICON "res\\Sun.ico"
#endif
After the above changes,I have added string to resource from visual studio, the .rc file is getting modified automatically like this
IDR_MAINFRAME ICON "res\\Sun.ico"
Can any one please help me in solving this issue, My changes should not be altered by the visual studio.
|
|
|
|
|
You should not modify the .rc file by hand, since it's content will be overwritten whenever you edit a resource in the resource editor. You should have a file named *.rc2 which the environment will not touch. Make your edits there. (I think this file is included as the last statement in your .rc file.)
Also, this will not change the icon at runtime, but at compile time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I understood what you have said, I tried the same way the compiler is throwing errors like "res\IMAPP.rc2(75): fatal error RC1004: unexpected end of file found". Could you please give me a sample so that I can use it or instructions need to be followed for achieving this. Thanking u a lot...
|
|
|
|
|
#ifdef _CHANGEICO
IDR_MAINFRAME ICON "res\\Orbit.ico"
#else
IDR_MAINFRAME ICON "res\\Sun.ico"
#endif
works just fine here. Make sure your #ifdef is properly closed by an #endif, which is the only reason I can think of creating your problem.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks a lot ..it is working perfectly fine now..
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure how your "I need to change the Mainframe icon at runtime" requirement is being met. 
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"Some people are making such thorough preparation for rainy days that they aren't enjoying today's sunshine." - William Feather
|
|
|
|
|
I am sorry for mentioning as changing the icon at runtime in the question posted earlier, actually I need to change Icon at compile time. For changing it at compile time everyone has helped me to achieve it and it's been achieved.
|
|
|
|
|
Syntax:
#if defined _CHANGEICO
IDR_MAINFRAME ICON "res\\icon1.ico"
#else
IDR_MAINFRAME ICON "res\\icon2.ico"
#endif
And You have to remove IDR_MAINFRAME From the .rc file
|
|
|
|
|
How to show only unique elements from this double linked list using UniqueList function? I made something, but it removes only the first...
<pre>
#include "iostream"
using namespace std;
void Add(int n);
void UniqueList();
struct Elem
{
int key;
Elem *prev;
Elem *next;
} *start;
int main()
{
int num;
while(cin >> num)
{
Add(num);
}
cout << endl;
UniqueList();
return 0;
}
void Add(int n)
{
Elem *p = start;
start = new Elem;
start->key = n;
start->next = p;
start->prev = NULL;
}
void UniqueList()
{
Elem *p = start;
if(NULL != start) cout << "The list is:" << endl;
else cout << "Empty list.";
while(NULL != p)
{ if(p->prev != p->next)
cout << p->key << endl;
p = p->next;
}
}
</pre>
|
|
|
|
|
one problem is that you're never setting the 'prev' members of the added items to anything but NULL. if you have a double-linked list, you need to do something like this:
void Add(int n)
{
Elem *p = start;
start = new Elem;
start->key = n;
start->next = p;
start->prev = NULL;
p->prev=start;
}
but that will probably blow up the first time through, since start itself hasn't been initialized, and *start is never allocated.
|
|
|
|
|
and what about the other main problem with the duplicates?
|
|
|
|
|
i'm going to guess that that's probably a side effect of:
a) not setting prev to anything but NULL and
b) not initializing 'start' the first time around.
and, maybe i don't understand the task, but why are you doing this:
if(p->prev != p->next)
why compare prev and next pointers ? and why compare prev and next and not p itself:
if(p->key != p->next->key)
|
|
|
|
|
I fixed the prev problem. "if(p->prev != p->next)" is a shot in the dark. Any ideas how to show only uniques 
|
|
|
|
|
you're on the right track. but the key thing that's missing is that the list needs to be sorted before you can be guaranteed that duplicates will show up in p and p->next.
duplicates, but p, p->next will never be the same: 1,4,3,5,3
this will work: 1,3,3,4,5
|
|
|
|
|
it's getting messy. How to sort a list??? (Doubly linked)
|
|
|
|
|
You do not need to actually sort the list, since that would mean you first compare a lot of them and move around some nodes, then remove some (the duplicates). That is too much effort for what is needed.
What you need to do is compare a lot and remove, but never move. In pseudo-code (always solve an algorithmic problem in pseudo-code first):
foreach(Node n1) {
foreach (Node n2 before n1) {
if (n2.value==n1.value) {
remove(n1);
break;
}
}
}
PS: and that could be done on a single-linked list as well, as both loops are enumerating from the start and never need to go backward.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, improve readability, and make me actually look at the code.
|
|
|
|
|
i did not understand anything you said. And whats that code C++?
|
|
|
|
|
if you don't want to sort:
for each node, Cur
for each node, Temp
if Temp!=Cur
if Temp.value==Cur.value, duplicate
Temp=Temp.next
Cur=Cur.next
basically, for each node, you compare its value to every other node. it's inefficient, but it will work.
you can also sort your list when you add:
1. walk the list, find the first node with a value greater than the new value. this is 'Cur'
2. change the next pointer of Cur->prev to point to your new node.
3. set your new node's prev to Cur->prev. now you're all linked in the prev direction.
4. change the prev pointer of Cur to point to your new node.
5. set your new node's cur to point to Cur. now you're all linked in the next direction.
that way, the list is always sorted, and you can just walk it, looking for duplicates.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
