|
I didn't shout out .Languages can have nuances and I just highlighted that it was not technical enough.There could be an answer more detailed than that.May be shouting out is a term old timers are more familiar with than me.
|
|
|
|
|
I-am-Learning wrote: I didn't shout
Putting a message in all capitals is considered to be shouting and is impolite. You really seem to be turning your refusal to learn into an art form.
I must get a clever new signature for 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
well If you think so, I cant help it.Comeon! Dont want fireworks at ever post.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oh my god ! all that religion to participate in the Forum.
|
|
|
|
|
I-am-Learning wrote: Oh my god ! all that religion to participate in the Forum.
Guess what? Most people won't have to read through all that "religious" stuff to participate, because they treat others with respect, and are polite. That essay is for people who are challenged in terms of online etiquette.
But if you can't be polite AND won't read through the religious stuff, you will be treated very roughly. So, either behave yourself, or have a thick skin to take up all the roughening. Don't be impolite and then whine about the aftermath.
"Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.
|
|
|
|
|
Then listen (aka read) and learn.
I must get a clever new signature for 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
I-am-Learning wrote: May be shouting out is a term old timers are more familiar with than me
Maybe you're just thick...
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
I-am-Learning wrote: I didn't shout out .Languages can have nuances and I just highlighted that it was not technical enough.
You did. When you're typing on a computer, typing something in all capital letters is equivalent to shouting.
I-am-Learning wrote: that it was not technical enough
There are better ways to say it - like "Thanks, but I could use some more details like [whatever specific details here]. Can you help?". Alternatively, you could pay a consultant to give you expert estimates, which will be technical enough, and more accurate.
I-am-Learning wrote: May be shouting out is a term old timers are more familiar with than me.
My 9 year old niece knows not to type it in all capitals while on the internet. I don't think of her as an old timer. It's just that you have to learn how to be polite.
"Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.
|
|
|
|
|
I-am-Learning wrote: You remind me of the post a couple of days back where they were describing the type of code project members in the forum.
Didn't see that: have you got a link?
I-am-Learning wrote: Are you trying to prove you are the Big Dog, who doesn't spare anyone smaller?
Wouldn't care who you were: if you act like a fool I'll pull you up on it.
I-am-Learning wrote: 3(5) votes for that messsage.Is that how reputations are built?
Reputations are irrelevant: they prove nothing and don't translate into anything: get over yourself.
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair.
nils illegitimus carborundum
me, me, me
|
|
|
|
|
Can you re-examine. i just asked a simple question in the forum.
Didn't see that: have you got a link?
No i dont have the link but it was about a couple of days back.May be someone else can help you with that.
Wouldn't care who you were: if you act like a fool I'll pull you up on it.
I didn't think I asked anything stupid or strange or foolish ?
|
|
|
|
|
It's not what you asked (well, not much, but the way you asked) and then responded when you didn't get exactly what you wanted. Nobody here is under any obligation to answer any question and most will do so because they want to help and will, for the most part, try their best and you were just plain rude. You really owe the op you responded to an apology.
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair.
nils illegitimus carborundum
me, me, me
|
|
|
|
|
I-am-Learning wrote: THIS IS NOT TECHNICAL enough
 I think you are asking almost spec for the project.
|
|
|
|
|
not exactly. - just how many cpu's of a server or cloud would be necessary for a site like code project for 50,000 simultaneous users.Do you have a idea, how many simultaneous people can the present configuration handle.
|
|
|
|
|
Retard.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
Then allow me to move this thread to a technical forum
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
The answer is 42. 
Chris Meech
I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar]
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra]
posting about Crystal Reports here is like discussing gay marriage on a catholic church’s website.[Nishant Sivakumar]
|
|
|
|
|
I-am-Learning wrote: Do you know what is even more irritating? That he could be right to some extent.
Big Grin
Oh how you missed the sarcasm, you missed it by a few light years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I hope so, it was only 2 days ago.
|
|
|
|
|
and you like talking to me.It's nice of you.You are not as bad and stupid as I thought you were.
|
|
|
|
|
I-am-Learning wrote: and you like talking to me
There you go again making assumptions.
I-am-Learning wrote: It's nice of you
I wish I'd done something to be nice.
I-am-Learning wrote: You are not as bad and stupid as I thought you were
There you go again making assumptions.
Looks to me if your space bar is broken. Also I'd be little cautious when my assumptions, epecially when its concerning me.
|
|
|
|
|
How can someone that's been here as long as you have freakin' negative reputation points? It looks like you should change your user ID, because you're NOT learning.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
If you are trying to host a site, that you just developed, then it's better to start with Shared Hosting, once you get the users and revenue going, you can shift to Dedicated Hosting, and once the site becomes big hit (you need to decide the criteria), then you try to host the site yourself. otherwise it's not worth it and too much efforts/money will be required to test if your new idea is going to work or not. becuase selft hosting is big resposibility, you need everything redundant, power / hardware / internet / storage etc...
And if you have that kind of money in your pocket, then buy 2 high configuration servers, with dual socket CPUs, quad core Xeons, with 32 GB RAM each, with RAID 10 harddrives. and then install vmware ESX in both. and configure atleast 1 web servers each (for redundacy) , and 1 database server with atleast 1 node for replication (both on sperate servers for redundacy).
you can allocate 8GB x 2 ram to sql server database, 4GB ram x 2 to web servers. reserve 2 GB for vmware host. and 1 GB for sql server failover witness database. and use rest for development environment. (and the networking hardware extra, hardware firewalls, switches, static ip, internet connections etc..)
And if this is too complex then go with Amazon EC Services or Windows / SQL Azure. and you dont have to worry about anything, and you can upgrade the hardware as per the demand, by changing the web.config.
I charge $120/hr for consultancy 
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks ,for your reply.Honestly and Seriously.Does that handle 50,000 users ?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
