|
I fixed that a couple of months ago.
I love that you just noticed it - it means the change was useful to the point of invisibility. A worthy goal for software.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Extremely slow. Sometimes the pages won't load and only loads on repeated refreshing. FYI.
|
|
|
|
|
I'll ask and see if there was some maintenance this morning.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, the slowness went away after about an hour or so.
|
|
|
|
|
Once a trouble-maker's rep has fallen below some acceptable value, say, -100, the account should be suspended from posting or voting for a period of 10 days. Once reinstated, the account's debator points are once again reset to zero, and we start again. If he falls below -100 a 2nd time, his account is supended for 30 days. When is account is reinstated a 2nd time, we re-zero his debator points, and we start again. If he falls below -100 a 3rd time, the account is locked and rendered unusable. At each suspension, all of the user's voting points are removed as well.
I know this is going to be hard to do, but Sherylee is raising havoc - again - and something should be done.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
Funny that you should suggest this. I was thinking along the lines of Chris "accidentally" sending you his whereabouts. A much more permanent solution, don't you think?
(I was going to reply to POH's Lounge post, but you beat me to it...)
|
|
|
|
|
Although I agree something should be done, I don't think this would work.
If a reputation is negative or zero, I don't think someone would feel so attached to this account to wait out the suspension period. Instead, they could just make a new account and repeat their behaviour.
It would be different if there was a reputation requirement of f.e. 500 Author/Authority before being able to vote anywhere and make non-programming posts.
modified 13-Sep-18 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
yeah but you are not a big poster of message in the Lounge. So by what you are saying you would have to post a bunch of answers in order to rake in the authority points in order to vote on a silly thread in the lounge. this will promote even more bullshit answers in the Q/A forum. my 2 cents.
I say restrict access via IP address (if possible) as "one of" a few ways to accomplish retribution and punishment.
|
|
|
|
|
Crappy answers would get downvoted though, so the poster knows they have to post something meaningful if they want to advance their reputation.
Personally I think it's not a bad thing to have an Author/Authority requirement on some functionality, considering the code project is about programming. Then again, Debator reputation as requirement on voting would be equally effective.
modified 13-Sep-18 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Thaddeus Jones wrote: considering the code project is about programming.
Yes and no.
However, I do see the point you are trying to make. 
|
|
|
|
|
Sherrylee is only raising havoc because people are responding to him. If they just ignored him he'd soon give up.
|
|
|
|
|
As others have rightly pointed out, blocking the account doesn't do anything. Blocking or quickly and easily cleaning up the damage will.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
No survey this week? 
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
Digital man: "You are, in short, an idiot with the IQ of an ant and the intellectual capacity of a hose pipe."
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like Elina has drawn a Blank again...
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
My fault on this one.
Blame Valentines Day. Or something.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Since a couple of days I have this issue that the input field where comments are entered and edited does not receive the focus. Before I could press the comment link and just start typing immedeately but now I have to click into the input area first.
I'm using IE 8.0.6001.19019 on Windows Vista
I experience the same at work with Windows 7 .
Did anything change here in the last couple of days?
modified on Sunday, February 13, 2011 2:00 PM
|
|
|
|
|
I've had this issue for over a week now - quite annoying 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, but a slightly newer build. Mine's 8.0.7600.16385.
|
|
|
|
|
Strange! I do have updates enabled. Hmmmm ...
|
|
|
|
|
What OS are you on? I am on Windows 7 64 bit.
|
|
|
|
|
Changed my original question.
At home it's Windows Vista Ultimate and at work I user Windows 7.
Thanks for the reminder Nishant!
|
|
|
|
|
No problem
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the reply!
Since I haven't seen a response from Chris yet it must be low priority. 
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
