|
Fully Agree.
If there is an Live Answer (i.e. one that has not been deleted) present, then the OP cannot delete their question.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This person[^] spamming in the Java forum.
I must get a clever new signature for 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
Not any more.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
If possible, I would vote against them.
I can see significant improvements in site usability, thank you very much.
Can you understand why scrollable areas inside page are difficult. Who cares if the whole page is a bit too long -- general scroll does it all. But nested scrollable areas hide part of text and require extra clicks. That's much more annoying. Please try yourself.
Thank you very much for understanding.
--SA
Sergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
I'll remove this.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you very much!
Sergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
JSOP recently posted a question: what level does -16 debator points on a 1 vote.
I tried to find out:
I took a snap-shot of his rep points, one voted him, shap-shot, and then changed my vote to a five.
Before: 38,101 62,040 87,012 2,929 597 1,676 7,920
1-Vote: 38,101 62,040 86,996 2,929 597 1,676 7,920
5-Vote: 38,101 62,040 86,996 2,929 597 1,676 7,920
So I do a -16 with an MVP/29,310 platinum debator.
Interestingly, when I change my vote to a 5, he didn't get the points back, let alone any extra points for a 5 vote. It doesn't appear to be time based, as five~ten minutes later he is still below the original value, having added one point for another question.
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
|
|
|
|
|
Members[^] page has 19 members in 2 Pages, but both the pages show the same members.
I am using Chrome 8.
|
|
|
|
|
The link is missing in your post...
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Chris, it's the same behavior in both IE9, FF4 and Chrome 9 too. I checked in my PC.
|
|
|
|
|
19 moderators!!! 
Fine it's allowed and there is no restriction but shouldn't it be little (actually more than little) specific on who can & who cannot be moderator? Also, I believe some responsibility must be attached to it and having so many is like having none!
Chris, is that ok, acceptable in a practical scenario?
|
|
|
|
|
Sandeep Mewara wrote: moderators
I dont think there are 19 moderators - only members.
But Chris might need to confirm this.
The funniest thing about this particular signature is that by the time you realise it doesn't say anything it's too late to stop reading it.
My latest tip/trick
|
|
|
|
|
Not really. Only 2 mods, the others are there so they can participate in the forum and bring any issues to the attention of the mods.
That said I think we need to remove the inactive ones there.
|
|
|
|
|
Dude
You moved all Chapters and Sections in menu and believe me it's very annoying. While old navigation panel was cool. It was very easy to use. This new change had killed usability, can you guys please put navigation panel? Oke if you want to put "Chapters and Section" in menu oke put them there, but don't remove navigation panel from left for "Chapters and Sections". BTW who gave you this idea? It's really so far from Human Computer Interaction Design (HCI) or User Experience Design rules. Please Please Please..... put it back  I am requesting you.
Thanks
-Habib Ahmed
habib bhutto
|
|
|
|
|
Dude, chill out. It's only a website. 
|
|
|
|
|
Good job! 
I don't know if I like the new emoticon selection page. I have to go to a new page, copy the emoticon verbiage, go back to my editing page and paste it into my post. Seems like a lot to do for a silly smiley. A smiley toolbar would be better...or something like that. My 2 cents.
[edit]
I could swear that I couldn't see the emoticons listed next to the input box as I usually have seen just a minute ago.
modified on Friday, January 21, 2011 8:04 AM
|
|
|
|
|
I have seen this also; they seem to come and go with the phases of the moon.
I must get a clever new signature for 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
A spammer doing advertising.
Look there[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Double shot, you guys.
Nice.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Spammer[^] in aisle 3. Release the attack hamsters.
|
|
|
|
|
Look at this [^] QA comment to answer #5. On Chrome and FF the comment is overflown and is behind Answer #6, on IE it shows fine, but the format of the comment is lost.
|
|
|
|
|
I encountered this on a few occasions too. The nested commenting is nice, but the rendering is not as good as with the regular forums.
|
|
|
|
|
Try now
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
