|
Amit Kumar Tiwari wrote: Oh ok, you mean to say that the voting of answers inside the question is not counted.
The vote is counted but for the answerer. The answerer answers the question so the points (high or low) from the votes for the answer is given to him/her. And that's how it should work. Isn't it?
..Go Green..
|
|
|
|
|
Generally, inquirers' programming Questions are formulated horrifically incorrecty. We cannot do much about that.
But there is just one question I have to ask inquirers again and again: "Is this about System.Windows.Forms or WPF?!".
It looks like people working with one system are completely unaware that anybody is working with another or both. As I give out advices on both, so asking for this detail almost every time UI is involved drives me crazy.
My suggestion is: would it be possible to place a big announcement/warning like: "If your question is about UI, don't forget...". It would save hundreds of useless transactions...
Thank you for your understanding.
Best wished in New Year!
Sergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately, there is no foolproof way to negate the stupidity of many people asking questions.
In spite of having previously been advised that they are posting in the wrong forum, some still continue to do so. Asking SQL questions in the C# or VB forums for example.
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
|
|
|
|
|
|
When one fills in the text input of the submission form (example: the Answers: "Add your answer here"), preview is shown dynamically (per on changed event or even per timer tick -- I don't know exactly). Apparently, this leads to redundant updates of the preview text and in practice can slow down the process.
What is worse, this feature sometimes practically hangs the page (even scroll bars and text selection). This happens when the site is busy (probably above some critical limit). In such situation (I experienced few minutes ago) closing the page, cancellation of all other loading pages from the site and starting over may help. Submission is often successful if a whole text input control is filled in on Paste operation -- editing the text back and force makes hanging very likely.
I'm using Mozilla SeaMonkey, but I think this server-side problem will be manifested with any client in one or another way.
I think this is new feature, but not so welcome one. I would propose replacing it with simpler but robust feature: "Update preview" button (perhaps not just "Preview" with generation of separate page, but this is acceptable).
Thank you for your understanding.
Best wishes in New Year!
Sergey A Kryukov
modified on Monday, December 27, 2010 10:19 PM
|
|
|
|
|
What browser were you experiencing this issue with, and are you still seeing this problem?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Mozilla SeaMonkey on XP Professional. (Did not see this problem for a while)
Sergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Basically what the subject says. Every time I search with "match all selected tags" checked it sends me to a page that says:
The operation timed out while trying to retrieve results. Please try again later
This even happens when I only have one tag selected. An example of a search that failed is blank search with tags C++ and GDI+.
"Learn from the mistakes of others. You can't live long enough to make them all yourself."-Unknown
|
|
|
|
|
We had (and still have) some load issues with the search but we're currently in beta testing an entirely new search system that alleviates many of the issues with the current system
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
an example:
ss1.str(""); ss1<< i+1;
|
|
|
|
|
Here is a bold statement of mine on the subject: as long as one tries to get it right based on Regex, it will not be right.
Doing it right takes a full-scale state machine, anything less will eventually fail.
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed. 
|
|
|
|
|
Added to the bug list
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
By the look of this message[^].
Just say 'NO' to evaluated arguments for diadic functions! Ash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Too bad he didn't include a photo of Hot Mai. Might have some takers, then.
|
|
|
|
|
"Hot Mai"? Do I have to bother and google that or do you care to elaborate?
|
|
|
|
|
His post said to reply to ootp2010 at Hot Mai .com
|
|
|
|
|
Oh doh ... how could I have missed that? 
Cheers!
|
|
|
|
|
Is there any place that shows the road map for CP? Features that will be added, features that are being considered, things like that...
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
The only one I was able to find is this one[^].
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like JSOP ready to shoot CG/Pete.
|
|
|
|
|
Internally, yes.
(I know, not the answer you're looking for  )
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
