C#

PIEBALDconsult wrote:

Why do you want to do it?

Electron Shepherd wrote:

allow existing processing to terminate cleanly

Electron Shepherd wrote:

while still running other background processing.

Electron Shepherd wrote:

other background processing

Electron Shepherd wrote:

A good example would be a web server implementing Keep-Alive. You may need to prevent new inbound connections, possibly for load balancing or other resource allocation requirements, but preserve the internal state data.

Electron Shepherd wrote:

Dont forget that just because you've never needed to do it doesn't mean no-one ever needs to do it.

jschell wrote:

And you are suggesting that you would not do that when stopping as well?

jschell wrote:

Don't forget that just because someone wants to do something it means that it is a good idea.

for( int i = 0; i < dataGridView1.Rows.Count; i++ )
{
    CheckBox ctl = (CheckBox)dataGridView1.Rows[i].FindControl( "CheckBoxControlName" );
    if( ctl != null )
    {
        ctl.Checked = ( i == e.RowIndex );
        ctl.Enabled = !( i == e.RowIndex );
    }
}

private void dataGridView1_CellContentClick(object sender, DataGridViewCellEventArgs e)
        {
            for (int i = 0; i < dataGridView1.Rows.Count; i++)
            {
                if (i == e.RowIndex)
                {
                    dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[0].Value = true;
                    dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[0].ReadOnly = true;
                }
                else
                {
                    dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[0].Value = false;
                    dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[0].ReadOnly = false;
                }
            }
        }

public partial class Form1: Form
    {
       internal static string textboxdata = string.Emtpy;
        public Form1()
        {
            InitializeComponent();
        }

 private void btnEkle_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
 {
 textboxdata  =  txtGsm1.Text ;

}
}

txtGsm1.Text = Form1.textboxdata ;