|
|
It's a fairly obvious imitation, though I'm not excusing it. We do already have in place tools that disallow spoofing another member's name by using alternate characters.
Edit: looks like we missed out on one of the alternate letters. I'll add it.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: looks like we missed out on one of the alternate letters. I'll add it.
I wonder if you got all the letters, Chriﯼ Mﮫunder. 
Maybe an AI algorithm to detect similarities in letters would be appropriate (though probably entirely too much work).
|
|
|
|
|
I think I got most of the ones that actually count.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
You might want to add one for a fairly convincing "r", Chris Maundeг. 
|
|
|
|
|
Nice. I had ґ, but not г
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Can this be done completely? There are literally hundreds of letters that one could pick from the Unicode character map (which would resemble a given alphabet). I'm curious to know what would be the approach.
May be I can do hack tests after you're done implementing it? 
There are some really weird people on this planet - MIM.
|
|
|
|
|
Shouldn't it be fixed user name ? or changes may have some delay like 2 hrs.
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87֦ʻ6ϣN8ȤBcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKQUFK[M`UKs*$GwU#QDXBER@CBN%
R0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-iTV.C\y<pjxsg-b$f4ia> -----------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
|
Hey man, I sincerely hope you didn't take it seriously.
I was wanting to just have some fun. And on the flip side, we've together shown Chris some more combinations that should be blocked.
There are some really weird people on this planet - MIM.
|
|
|
|
|
Hey yourself, Rajesh.
No problemo. I actually thought it was pretty funny.
I only reported it because, as you say, it ought not to be possible, really.
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
|
|
|
|
|
Henry Minute wrote: it ought not to be possible, really
Not for the nerds of our kind. 
I think I'll do some hack tests and report Chris of the outcome after they implement the fix.
There are some really weird people on this planet - MIM.
|
|
|
|
|
XML Parsing Error: no element found Location: http://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Edit.aspx?fid=2605&select=3601196&floc=/Forums/2605/The-Back-Room.aspx&action=m Line Number 1, Column 1: ^
fix: copy post, go back to message, hit reply paste post, hit post button
Opacity, the new Transparency.
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds like the same White Page bug others have seen.
This has been a tricky one. There are two issues I'm looking at (well, 1 I have half a dozen people looking at, and 1 I'm pondering very, very deeply).
Neither of them really make sense.
We'll fix it, though.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris
If I have the reply to page open for an extended period of time (more than 10s of minutes) composing, it is more likely to happen.
If I post it, and it fails, I can 'back' to the page and copy the text.
If I leave the text in and hit 'back', it goes to the thread.
If I remove the text and hit back, it warns me I will lose work.
If I cancel and then try it again, it warns me again.
If I paste the text back into the text box, and hit 'back', it doesn't warn me.
It's like it is inverting a 'contains text' flag.
Could that make it flake on the send?
Opacity, the new Transparency.
|
|
|
|
|
This should now be fixed.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
It seems to be, since yesterday.
Opacity, the new Transparency.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: they seem to be non-CP hosted
Yes, and when I click on it, it get 'blocked' message. That should because of security reasons.
I feel we should suggest CPians not give external links to images.
|
|
|
|
|
Try refreshing - they are showing fine for me. What browser are you using?
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: What browser are you using?
IE8. Sadly, I can't see them. I refreshed. I get all blank images with X at the left top.
|
|
|
|
|
|
yes.
using FF3.6, IE7, Chrome6, ...
did you forget to pay this year's Image Tax?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
