|
Manish_84 wrote: 24 hrs to generation commission
For that few of rows, there is no way it should take that long.
Common sense is admitting there is cause and effect and that you can exert some control over what you understand.
|
|
|
|
|
Lately I've been working an C# app that stores values in an Access db. One of the fields stores a time value. (7:30 PM)
Is there a more effecient way to store a time value than using the DateTime column? I will need to convert it to a DateTime value in the SELECT query.
Serious answers please. 
|
|
|
|
|
I'm a bit confused. 
You say that want a better way to store time in Access, but you will need to convert it to DateTime in your select statement. Then why not store it in a DateTime column to begin with ?
I worked for a Time and Attendace company for a while and what I've learned is that you always seem to need the date component along with the time because there is always the overnight shift worker. (11pm to 7am)
When you store the data in a DateTime column, the calculation of time difference is already built into those functions, you don't have to worry about crossing midnight etc.
My vote is to store the time in a DateTime column. 
I'm getting off my soapbox now. 
Best of luck with your project.
|
|
|
|
|
The key word here is "store". Access has a max capacity of 2gb.
DateTime types require 8 bytes for each field. Some Access developers have advocated using an int type for Date only values. This would be accomplished by storing the number of days since 1900 and using the DateAdd() function to convert the value to DateTime in the SELECT query.
I ask for serious responses! 
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Blythe wrote: I ask for serious responses!
Use a DateTime-field - that's what most people do, and that's where you can expect the most support. You can fit a whole lotta dates in those 2 Gb, and optimizing for space is a bit of a timewaster IMO.
I are Troll
|
|
|
|
|
Wow that's pretty serious! 
I certainly don't want to create a second curse by trying to eliminate the first one. Thanks for the reply.
|
|
|
|
|
I ask for serious design. Using Access for something when you are afraid of running into the 2gb limit is terrible. Use SQL Compact Edition or something else. I think the OLE automation date format is only 4 bytes.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree with Mr Gray, if you have to optimise for space using spit Access then you are using the wrong tool. Seriously change tools, there are many better options out there than spit Access
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
I agree with the others, except when the application would fit the following description:
- a lot of fields are time values, so storing them in a compact format will be significant to DB size;
- the time resolution and range required are such that a small integer could do, say 1-minute resolution and a 2-day range (to cope with midnight shifts), would fit in a 16-bit int;
- your DB queries are known in advance and don't require complex datetime calculations.
If there is start time and end time, I would consider storing begin time and duration instead.
If the above matches pretty well, then you're set for a smaller DB, and no installation, as the JET engine is always present AFAIK.
OTOH if the above feel like restrictions, if there is too much uncertainty about how the requirements will evolve, if you want the comfort of full T-SQL, ... then by all means use a real DB and pay the price.
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: then by all means use a real DB and pay the price.
I would love to use SQL Server Express but the software is being deployed with CD-ROM using InstallShield 2010 express edition. This edition cannot install SQL Server silently. (Which would be a must)
At this point I can't justify the $900 upgrade cost on InstallShield so Access seems to be my best bet. 
|
|
|
|
|
I guess the problem here is not the field type in Access - in almost all cases it must be DateTime - but the user interface.
Make sure you can convert a user input like "7:30 PM" correctly into a DateTime value. And that you format values returned from the database in a way the user wants to see them.
For the communication with the database, you must use a parameterized query when you want to send DateTime values from your application to the database - be certain to add the DateTime values as DateTime values, and do not convert them to strings when adding them!
|
|
|
|
|
We have saved the 24 hr time in a text field as HH:MM
That being said you need to look at what overhead is needed to convert it to a true time.
By the way Microsoft Access and serious do not go together.
|
|
|
|
|
I have created sql stored procedure to calculate work hours of employees in a week.EmployeeID,FromDate,ToDate,Department,Designation are the parameters passed.My output is:
Day EmpID EmpName FirstTimeIn LastTimeOut WorkHours Break
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wednesday 2855747 AlexanderMathew 9:01:09 AM 6:15:14PM 8:59:05
Thursday 2855747 AlexanderMathew 9:45:09 AM 6:45:09 PM 8:00:00 Friday 2855747 AlexanderMathew 9:08:09 AM 7:20:09 PM 9:00:00
Saturday 2855747 AlexanderMathew 9:30:09 AM 6:30:09 PM 8:00:00
Sunday 2855747 AlexanderMathew 9:32:09 AM 6:28:09 PM 8:00:00
Monday 2855747 AlexanderMathew 9:20:09 AM 6:25:09 PM 8:05:00
Tuesday 2855747 AlexanderMathew 9:02:09 AM 6:02:09 PM 8:30:00
But the problem is that,in my output 'day' is shown as row.But is there any way to display day as columns.ie:
eg:
EmpName Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday WorkHours
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alexander 07:11:18 Saturday Sunday 06:20:41 08:06:28 03:23:27 25:01:54
This stored procedure is for reporting.Hope you will help me to overcome this problem..
Thanks in advance
|
|
|
|
|
Just have a look through and see whether it solves your need,
Approach - 1 (using subquery)
sample table,
create table #tm (days varchar(10), empid varchar(10), empname varchar(100), intime varchar(20), outtime varchar(20), workhours varchar(20))
sample records,
insert into #tm
select 'Wednesday', '2855747', 'AlexanderMathew', '9:01:09 AM', '6:15:14PM', '8:59:05'
union
select 'Thursday','2855747','AlexanderMathew','9:45:09 AM','6:45:09 PM','8:00:00'
union
select 'Friday','2855747','AlexanderMathew','9:08:09 AM','7:20:09 PM','9:00:00'
union
select 'Saturday','2855747','AlexanderMathew','9:30:09 AM','6:30:09 PM','8:00:00'
union
select 'Sunday','2855747','AlexanderMathew','9:32:09 AM','6:28:09 PM','8:00:00'
union
select 'Monday','2855747','AlexanderMathew','9:20:09 AM','6:25:09 PM','8:05:00'
union
select 'Tuesday','2855747','AlexanderMathew','9:02:09 AM','6:02:09 PM','8:30:00'
select distinct empid, empname,
(select workhours from #tm b where a.empid = b.empid and days = 'Sunday') sunday,
(select workhours from #tm b where a.empid = b.empid and days = 'Monday') Monday,
(select workhours from #tm b where a.empid = b.empid and days = 'Tuesday') Tuesday,
(select workhours from #tm b where a.empid = b.empid and days = 'Wednesday') Wednesday,
(select workhours from #tm b where a.empid = b.empid and days = 'Thursday') Thursday,
(select workhours from #tm b where a.empid = b.empid and days = 'Friday') Friday,
(select workhours from #tm b where a.empid = b.empid and days = 'Saturday') Saturday
from #tm a
disadvantage of approach-1:
---------------------------
1) if the table has huge records then the above will take time for execution
Approach - 2
-------------
create table #tm1 (empid varchar(10), empname varchar(100),
sunday varchar(20), monday varchar(20), tuesday varchar(20), wednesday varchar(20), thursday varchar(20),
friday varchar(20), saturday varchar(10))
insert into #tm1 (empid, empname)
select distinct empid, empname from #tm
update a set a.sunday = b.workhours
from #tm1 a
join #tm b on a.empid = b.empid and b.days = 'Sunday'
update a set a.monday = b.workhours
from #tm1 a
join #tm b on a.empid = b.empid and b.days = 'Monday'
update a set a.tuesday = b.workhours
from #tm1 a
join #tm b on a.empid = b.empid and b.days = 'Tuesday'
update a set a.wednesday = b.workhours
from #tm1 a
join #tm b on a.empid = b.empid and b.days = 'Wednesday'
update a set a.thursday = b.workhours
from #tm1 a
join #tm b on a.empid = b.empid and b.days = 'Thursday'
update a set a.friday = b.workhours
from #tm1 a
join #tm b on a.empid = b.empid and b.days = 'Friday'
update a set a.saturday = b.workhours
from #tm1 a
join #tm b on a.empid = b.empid and b.days = 'Saturday'
select * from #tm1
i didn't do calculating total work hour calculation.
|
|
|
|
|
You need to use the pivot function[^], assuming you are using sql server of course.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all
Does PRINT work in sql server function???
One person's data is another person's program.
--J.Walia
|
|
|
|
|
Yes
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
but i am getting the below error:
Invalid use of side-effecting or time dependent operator in 'PRINT' within function
One person's data is another person's program.
--J.Walia
|
|
|
|
|
Then you are trying to print something and it produces an error, find out what the produces the error and fix it. Master of logic - thats me!
What are you trying to print
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
J walia wrote: Does PRINT work in sql server function???
No.
You cannot use PRINT inside a function in SQL Server.
|
|
|
|
|
David Skelly wrote: in sql server function
My mistake I didn't even see that - thanks for fixing that.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
thanks for reply.
then what is solution for this?
I have one more question. can we use
Execute sp_executesql in functions
One person's data is another person's program.
--J.Walia
|
|
|
|
|
You do realise that it is probably quicker to actually create a function and try and execute a stored proc. Then take the error message to google/BOL and read up on the problem. It will give you a greater depth of knowledge than a forum post. AND you will not risk some one giving you the wrong answer.
You also can't use dynamic SQL in a function, just to save your next question!
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
thanks sir.
One person's data is another person's program.
--J.Walia
|
|
|
|
|
J walia wrote: then what is solution for this?
The solution to what? Your question was "Can I use print in a function?" The answer is "No, you can't".
J walia wrote: I have one more question. can we use
Execute sp_executesql in functions
No.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
