|
rentzk wrote: the customers sure could
They are relatives of Murphy[^]. 
Chris Meech
I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar]
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra]
|
|
|
|
|
hmmm.... Murphy's in-Laws...
|
|
|
|
|
On the Plus side this was easy for me to fix.
|
|
|
|
|
Shouldn't you be telling this to a priest in a confessional booth?
Steve Wellens
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps you've hit upon an idea for a new message board 'Coding Confession Box'
|
|
|
|
|
In most cases when see code that can catch an access violation your looking at a coding horror.
Steve
|
|
|
|
|
Actual the code for catching the access violations was pretty good, It logged a snap shot of the callstack to a file, then using witchcraft .map and .code files you could find and fix the problem back at base without having to reproduce the problem.
|
|
|
|
|
I had written some code many years ago (VAX Basic I think) and had asked a student programmer to tidy it up and annotate it. He came back a few hours later and said he was finished. I took a look and he had rearranged all the lines of code in alphabetical order ....
|
|
|
|
|
Ouch!
That sounds worse than dropping a old box of punch cards ...
CQ de W5ALT
Walt Fair, Jr., P. E.
Comport Computing
Specializing in Technical Engineering Software
|
|
|
|
|
Look at the bright side.
Now you have an alphabeticaly ordered list of bugs.
I bug
|
|
|
|
|
If they had line numbers, that might not be so bad.
|
|
|
|
|
If I wanted to mess with my teacher that would be the way to do it...but I personally drew ASCII art with my source to mess with them 
|
|
|
|
|
Did he sort it by hand or fed the code to some elegant sorting algorithm he invented
|
|
|
|
|
Are you kidding?  He probably didn't know the meaning of the word invented and certainly didn't know what an algorithm was.
|
|
|
|
|
'-?Ibbdddeeeehiillnooooopssttuuuvwwy
oops, sorry, I mean:
I don't beleive you - who would be so stupid?
|
|
|
|
|
Impressive. I'm not sure if he'll make a good computer programmer but he sure as hell would make a good computer.
Steve
|
|
|
|
|
He may be the best bugger of the world 
Don't forget to Click on [Vote] and [Good Answer] on the posts that helped you.
Regards - Kunal Chowdhury | Software Developer | Chennai | India | My Blog | My Tweets | Silverlight Tutorial
|
|
|
|
|
<br />
";".ToCharArray()<br />
'nuf said.
|
|
|
|
|
Did I mention that this was an argument to string.Split() which is defined to take (params char[])?
They could have simply typed:
';'
|
|
|
|
|
It would have been a gem if the code was something like this:
"argument1;argument2;argument3".Split(";".ToString());
I have no smart signature yet...
|
|
|
|
|
Derek Viljoen wrote: Did I mention that this was an argument to string.Split() which is defined to take (params char[])?
That was only introduced in .NET 3.5 IIRC.
I have written similar code ages back too.
|
|
|
|
|
Same here - and until today I still would have had I not seen your post and tried using a single char parameter.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
harold aptroot wrote: No, see here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/b873y76a%28VS.80%29.aspx[^]
Well, I can't say, the f***in page is stuck on C++ 
PS: IIRC C++ does not support .NET params.
Update:
IE to the rescue. I see it was there (in 2.0), maybe I am thinking of something else...
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know what else you could be thinking of - you were talking about the params overload for .NET 2.0 right?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
