|
|
Wow, the Grand Negus comes back from the past!
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
It's been done: It's called COBOL.
|
|
|
|
|
I am also poor in english, still I am trying to improvise daily. As this community belongs to Programming Language only, so probably you will never find any good teacher here, You better join any english class, read more & more news papers loudly, follow grammer books to frame your sentences & dictionary to build up huge stock of words.
|
|
|
|
|
you make me so disappointed. 
why cann't you learn it yourself anymore ?
such as iciba[] .
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, this man is excellent.
You know how to learn English on the website of iciba.
|
|
|
|
|
Because the questioner and me all is Chinese. 
|
|
|
|
|
Anyone who wouldn't teach you grammar. Learn vocabulary.
Avoid grammar like death. Grammar kills your English/Turkish/Chinese/kids/animals/...
Funny thing is, by focusing on vocabulary ONLY, you WILL learn grammar, but *effortlessly*!
That's how a 10 years old English boy uses past participles and conditional structures correctly, although he never studied grammar! It's magical!
That's the "natural" way of learning a language.
And idiots try now to figure a better way of teaching languages, when "nature" already showed the least painful, most effective way of doing it: with 0 grammar!
Speaking "grammar" to people who won't make it their job/specialty to study/teach English is a CRIME against English (and students).
Nature found this "magical" trick :
By getting to understand more and more words in a text, you will get less and less intimidated, and more and more motivated to read more, and even to dare speak the language. This "motivational" process is insanely powerful, it is auto-accelerated: the more you get comfortable, the more pain turns into pleasure and confidence, which motivates you to go even further, and so on..
In this process, grammar is a killer. It just sucks all the motivation out of any student, glorifies pain over pleasure. An insanely effective killer!
By avoiding grammar, I learned to speak 5 languages.
Funny thing: my French is better (grammatically) than the average French guy's  Although my pronunciation isn't..
My Arabic is, by far, better than 99% of the native Arabic speakers.
Same thing applies for spelling: I perfectly understand and speak Italian, but I can't write a single Italian word! (well, "I" is "io" in Italian, I think..)
How can you learn vocabulary without getting the spelling in the same process, for free?!!
English is not my native tongue. What do you think of my English?
Finally, a simple fact no "official" teacher will ever understand: spoken English is almost a totally separated language from written English. If you want to *speak* English, you will have to learn 2 languages! A smart teacher can make it one language and a half.
Vocabulary = language.
Vocabulary brings with it all other aspects to any language. Just make an effort for vocabulary, and get the rest for free!
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, boy.
My English is poor, too!
Maybe you are Chinese according to the email server of your email address.
|
|
|
|
|
fyl222 wrote: I am good at MFC, but English is poor, who can teach me EngLish~
Google
"Opinions are neither right nor wrong. I cannot change your opinion. I can, however, change what influences your opinion." - David Crow
Never mind - my own stupidity is the source of every "problem" - Mixture
cheers,
Alok Gupta
VC Forum Q&A :- I/ IV
Support CRY- Child Relief and You
|
|
|
|
|
hi friends,
please help me...
|
|
|
|
|
COM components are loaded via CoCreateInstance [^].
If you need to use an ActiveX control and you're writing an MFC application, Visual Studio may create a wrapper for you: choose Project->Add Class menu item and then select MFC Class From ActiveX Control (at least on VS 2005).
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
To understand this better, let's look at a simple example: Suppose I have a VB ActiveX DLL with a class called Test, which has a method called
TestItOut(). You can create the object and call the method like this:
#import "test.dll" no_namespace named_guids
_TestPtr pTest = 0;
HRESULT hres = pTest.CreateInstance ( __uuidof(Test) );
pTest->TestItOut();
|
|
|
|
|
hi
thanks yar...i want some information...
#import "test.dll" no_namespace named_guids // this is given compilation error
please help me friend....
|
|
|
|
|
can u please help any body how to call vb dll in vc++
i MY VB DLL IS mydll.dll
#import "c:\mydll.dll" // this is given compilation errors
or
typedef CString (WINAPI*ifunc)(CString str);
INCREMENTFUN pIncrement;
HINSTANCE hLib;
hLib = LoadLibrary("..\\scdthndl.dll");
pIncrement = (INCREMENTFUN)GetProcAddress((HMODULE)hLib, "StringToCSV"); // here its giving pIncrement = 0x0000000
any one can help me....
|
|
|
|
|
Firstly, if you're using GetProcAddress the function should be exported from the DLL. Check with something like depends[^].
#import is for type libraries. Using this implies that the method is exported using COM, in which case GetProcAddress will not work.
Steve
|
|
|
|
|
hi
i have vb activex dll...i want to use vc++...please help me....
HINSTANCE hLib;
hLib = LoadLibrary(c:\scdthndl.dll");
pIncrement = (INCREMENTFUN)GetProcAddress((HMODULE)hLib, "StringToCSV");
pIncrement is giving 0x000000..
|
|
|
|
|
As I told you before, verify the function is exported.
Steve
|
|
|
|
|
Member 3653751 wrote: c:\mydll.dll
Member 3653751 wrote: scdthndl.dll
Why different names?
Member 3653751 wrote: pIncrement = (INCREMENTFUN)GetProcAddress((HMODULE)hLib, "StringToCSV"); // here its giving pIncrement = 0x0000000
Afterwards, you should call GetLastError() to obtain more info.
Did you check what is the exported function name (you may use, for instance, the Depends tool)?
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
sorry.... by mistake i typed scdthndl.dll...if i give mydll.dll also same problem....
can u please help
i want use vb dll in vc++
|
|
|
|
|
Did you check the exported function name?
Do you read the suggestions (mine and of the other folks?)?
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
i checked exported function name....it is correct only...
but its giveing NULL....
|
|
|
|
|
Why didn't you call, as suggested, GetLastError?
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
the other comments are fully right to call the dll.
But for string parameter you should use BSTR type. An article with basic explanations:
Guide to BSTR and C String Conversions[^]
Press F1 for help or google it.
Greetings from Germany
|
|
|
|
|
Check whether scdthndl.dll is loaded, means hLib is having value or it is also 0?
Величие не Бога может быть недооценена.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
