|
Yepp!!
I have for my bank Though it don't reserve, It gives peace of mind.
Believe Yourself™
|
|
|
|
|
Your question should have been who are all these gullible buggers who trust ANYONE with your data. I may have to supply them with my data but I don't trust them.
As Richard said I don't even trust myself, in an aberration I put some data on LinkedIn, I regularly have a bad feeling about that data.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Yes - My employer - I own the business.
|
|
|
|
|
I assume it's not there, because no one trusts facebook 
|
|
|
|
|
ed welch wrote: I assume it's not there, because no one trusts facebook
They don't have a 0 in their vote options - so they could not put Facebook on there.
|
|
|
|
|
For FB they need ratings in minus(-Ve) And there might be missing.
All the same goes with social networking sites 
Believe Yourself™
|
|
|
|
|
So why have them both on this survey?
"It's like the sixties, but with less hope."
|
|
|
|
|
I believe we treat our client data quite well. Short of searching everyone as they leave. However I do not know how well my personal data is kept, in the two and a half years I have been here we have had three people do the HR job. (Small company with only one HR person).
|
|
|
|
|
Base on category we cannot measure trust
Life's Like a mirror. Smile at it & it smiles back at you.- P Pilgrim
So Smile Please
|
|
|
|
|
i agree with you
|
|
|
|
|
My rule of thumb:
The less you tell 'em, the less they'll know.
Two heads are better than one.
|
|
|
|
|
Denial is Policy!
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
|
|
|
|
|
Dalek Dave wrote: Denial is Policy!
No, Denial is a river in Egypt.
|
|
|
|
|
I try to trust third parties with my private data only as much as is needed for them to accomplish the functionality/service I need from them. If they ask for more info than I feel is necessary for them to do this, I look for alternatives.
The one area that kind of disturbs me as far as the amount of info stored about me is my web mail account - since it has my communications with my clients and friends, passwords (or the ability to reset passwords) for a number of different sites, financial and purchase info, etc. It seems like it could easily be a central point of security failure.
|
|
|
|
|
I dont really care. So no answer.
|
|
|
|
|
I have not read your post. So no reply.
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Mother should I trust the government" 
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
I don't even trust my mother (completly) ... I would give her a 4
Steve
_________________
I C(++) therefore I am
|
|
|
|
|
:shrug:
Regarding trust, what's so special about the government?
|
|
|
|
|
government doesn't make money and has no investors. it takes money, but that is another story.
if a private business mismanages your data it could be the end of the end of that business in a matter of months.
if government fails with data protection, it gets added to the long list of failues and we shrug and wish for something better.
|
|
|
|
|
PCoffey wrote: if a private business mismanages your data it could be the end of the end of that business in a matter of months.
Why does Christian still pay Telstra?
That might have been a problem for the business once upon a time (capitalist utopia, if you ask the totally biased me).
Nowadays, if some quick money is to be made from "mismanaging" your data, you create a spinoff, change brand name, move the data in a merger, or one of many other ways. End of that business is not an issue anymore.
Companies, as much as the Government, will push the envelope as far as they can. "Voting with your wallet" is feasible in a pool of many virtually identical offers, but that's instable situation in a globalized economy.
|
|
|
|
|
peterchen wrote: Why does Christian still pay Telstra?
Government backed monopoly?
He seems smart enough, so I can't think of any other reason.
Opacity, the new Transparency.
|
|
|
|
|
We had a similar situation here about 10 years ago. We now have some decent competition[^], which hasn't much affected the quality of customer service, however. As with Telekom, "it's good while it works".
Generally, technical quality seems to be good compared to UK/US. The monopoly did help a lot in the infancy of the technology, though: when something was not working you had to deal with one (albeit sluggish) company, instead of three companies pointing fingers at each other. Also, the huge price drop means there's not much money to be made from investing into infrastructure - resulting in some rural areas being largely left out.
Competition certainly helped consumer adoption and drove down prices, but it doesn't automatically solve all problems.
|
|
|
|
|
Given how the bureaucracy works, theft is not the only way the government may "loose" your data. Here in Ohio an intern took a laptop home and left it in the car.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
