|
If I remember it right, these things are calculated once every week.
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
|
|
|
|
|
| We're in the process of moving over to the new reputation system fully. If all goes to plan you'll see your updated status today. cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
so it is this today, not yesterday's; minor slip of plan 
suggestions:
1. apply background colors to color names in the FAQ's table explaining the statuses.
2. make that table a lot smaller and more readable, by using a simple matrix:
rows: author, authority, ...
columns: bronze, silver, gold, platinum (with background color)
cell content: points needed
3. put actual numbers under the (colored) statuses on the Who's Who page.
4. support sorting on each of the rep numbers (author, ..., total) on the Who's Who page.
PS: oh no, all rep gone again...
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for rep numbers on personal page. Much better.
Two minor suggestions:
- you could still fit all seven of them on one line
- I would prefer alphabetical order here too (Debator is off, as it was for a while in the rep graph legend)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Fixed. Thanks cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Not 'Platinum' (yet) so I can't edit 
Section 15: ... or bpoth e-mail addresses ...Dave
Binging is like googling, it just feels dirtier. (Pete O'Hanlon)
BTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)
Why are you using VB6? Do you hate yourself? (Christian Graus)
|
|
|
|
|
Good catch Dave.
What do you think of the FAQs?Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
I haven't read them in depth - just a speed read so far but you seem to have covered all bases.
I'll be sad to see the closure of the programming forums as I find them easier to navigate than QAs and I enjoy the discussions that evolve around the question's subject or implementation of a suggested solution which doesn't seem to happen in QAs. I'm sure I'll get used to it though - it certainly looks prettier and more modern!
OT - any idea when the MVP certificates are being sent out? There's a blank space on my wall waiting to proudly receive it  Dave
Binging is like googling, it just feels dirtier. (Pete O'Hanlon)
BTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)
Why are you using VB6? Do you hate yourself? (Christian Graus)
|
|
|
|
|
Sean Ewington wrote: What do you think of the FAQs?
If there're FAQs other than the message board FAQ I think they're very well hidden.  3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
Here[^] is one, the other's are linked at the bottom.
Get your point though - I found them in the Latest Articles list yesterday and just assumed they are posted somewhere prominent.Dave
Binging is like googling, it just feels dirtier. (Pete O'Hanlon)
BTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)
Why are you using VB6? Do you hate yourself? (Christian Graus)
|
|
|
|
|
| Sean only got them up in the last day or so. We're still filling in the blanks and will then have them linked in prominant places. cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Also, you can edit it now.
We opened it up to Silver membersThanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
 Dave
Binging is like googling, it just feels dirtier. (Pete O'Hanlon)
BTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)
Why are you using VB6? Do you hate yourself? (Christian Graus)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Abhijit!
We're fixing this now  Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vote "Remove this message" on it to get it removed. I have."WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
The formatting for this question[^] seems to be messed up. The bar with Report et al is displayed on the bottom and the question is shown below the poster details.
Firefox 3.6, Windows 7
|
|
|
|
|
Checking the ignore html ... fixed it
|
|
|
|
|
To day I happened to restuble onto the w3.org validator page, and for grins, I submitted codeproject.com. and got this back:
CodeProject.com validation results[^].45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
www.amazon.com
1200 Errors, 88 warning(s)
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
|
|
|
|
|
Should be a little better now, and I'll clean up the important stuff next upload (few days).
Validators always whine about extra closing slashes on tags. They certainly don't want to make it easy for you to transitional to XHTML. All or nothing...cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
