|
If a message is voted anything less than 5 (example here[^]) - the caption still remains blue. It was changing to gray a few days ago. Has the "turning to gray" idea been dropped?Me, I'm dishonest. And a dishonest man you can always trust to be dishonest.
Honestly. It's the honest ones you want to watch out for...
|
modified on Wednesday, March 3, 2010 5:29 AM
|
|
|
|
|
AFAIK it is Blue if unvoted, Red if voted up and Grey if voted down.
However, when there are several votes, it depends on the range of the voting as to whether is is Grey,Blue or Red.
Example. Post voted down, goes grey, a five vote follows, turning it blue, another 5 vote may not turn it red, depending on the weighting of the voter.
Eventually it will turn red if enough up votes are cast to lift it's average sufficiently high enough.------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
|
|
|
|
|
Ah....this has a changed a little since it was implemented.
Thanks
 Me, I'm dishonest. And a dishonest man you can always trust to be dishonest.
Honestly. It's the honest ones you want to watch out for...
|
|
|
|
|
|
If it is less than 3 it will turn gray.
|
|
|
|
|
| Hey, your right! ------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
|
|
|
|
|
Really? still blue here.
I noticed this a while back but just figured Chris was tired of seeing to many post in gray because of some univoter so just left them blue.
|
|
|
|
|
| The level for being grayed depends on your noise threshold. I don't know exact values. 3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
Ah yeah that worked
Weird tho don't remember changing that setting and I used to get them gray.
Might be just my memory fading
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks. I did not know that.Me, I'm dishonest. And a dishonest man you can always trust to be dishonest.
Honestly. It's the honest ones you want to watch out for...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dalek Dave wrote: Hey, your right!
This is the second time I'm noticing you having made this elementary grammatical mistake.
You are deemed inappropriate from this moment, to make fun of, or to correct, or even notice any grammatical mistakes on any post here, whatsoever.
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
|
|
|
|
|
Hmm. There is clearly an error there.
You posted a message congratulating New Zealand on beating Australia. The message did not self destruct, melt, or rearrange itself in amusing anagram instuling to the Kiwi captain.
(oh, and you can set your noise tolerance to define when messages change colours. See the FAQ[^])cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: You posted a message
I did not actually post that message - Sandeep Mewara did.
But, noise tolerance did fix the problem - now I finally know what that does. Pretty cool.Me, I'm dishonest. And a dishonest man you can always trust to be dishonest.
Honestly. It's the honest ones you want to watch out for...
|
|
|
|
|
|
I had to insert some extra hard returns for this post[^] to look neat.
If I try editing the message, it looks ugly (with extra line breaks), but that's what look normal after it's been posted (and in the preview). I wonder where did the line breaks go...
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
|
|
|
|
|
This has been fixed.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Very good, thank you.
Lately, you should have been whipping the hamsters ruthlessly.
"Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi everyone,
I’m sorry if it does not belong to this forum but I did not find another appropriate forum.
I do not understand how the membership status is gained. I have read the http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/Reputation.aspx but I still don’t understand.
Let’s say that according to the description “Member Reputation System” you have to have 5000 points as author or 1500 points as Editor or… to be gained as gold member. But when I go throughout the gold members, almost 50% of them do not fit the rule. Hmm… maybe I missed something. Thanks in advance for explanation.
Petr.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently we're displaying the wrong membership status - it's from the old system, not the new.
We're working to get this fixed so apologies for the confusion.cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for quick answer, Chris. Everything's clear now
|
|
|
|
|
|
How come the user is still active? If not deactivate, Isn't there a process of sending a 'warning' email to such users?
|
|
|
|
|
His account will probably be removed as soon as Chris is done feeding the hamsters
|
|
|
|
|
| What is he feeding the hamsters to? ------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
|
|
|
|
|
I don't want to know so I never asked 
|
|
|
|
|
| Because CP's staff are on North American time and this was reported during the middle of the night. Once someone gets into the office a banhammer will be applied. 3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
| Thanks, the mess has been cleaned up. cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
