|
I know he wasn't responsible, but he did ask who says that the post was abusive.
Panic, Chaos, Destruction.
My work here is done.
|
|
|
|
|
| Aplolgies, I think I had my wires crossed. Cpianism is reporting me as abusive, due to my signature, this is unrelated to my post about the offensive message in the c# lounge. I do think this is where he got the idea of reporting me from though. Cpianism: I have a negative number in my Rep so please fix it.
Chris Maunder: That isn't a bug.
|
|
|
|
|
This user is attacking me in his Signature so he should be banned from CP.modified on Monday, February 8, 2010 5:03 AM
|
|
|
|
|
He is not attacking you, he is pointing out a fact.
Small minded people are the ones that try to change the facts to fit their views, rather than changing their views to fit the facts.
Do explain, please, which part of the signiture is incorrect?
Was it your posting requesting the change of your negative status, or #1's reply to same?
We would all like to hear your answer, please justify why you think you should not have a negative status?------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
|
|
|
|
|
By pointing to me in his sig he is attacking me and this is totaly not acceptable. I call for chris help to put an end for this and delete the sig.
|
|
|
|
|
So he pointed out something you did and you did not like the fact that he pointed it out?
Weird, perhaps you shouldn't have done it?
Odd thing is, everyone else loves his sig.
I wonder what Chris will do?------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
|
|
|
|
|
If something I did then it is personal and I was not talking to him I was talking to chris and he have no right to put my name and point at me in his sig. So I'm waiting for chris too to hear what he have to say.
|
|
|
|
|
And yet you continue to one vote me.
The fact is you are an arse, people have downvoted you for being an arse, and when you don't like them pointing out that not only are you an arse, but you make a twat of yourself too by thinking there is a bug because of your negative arse-reflective reputation, you react like a four year old with a hissy fit.
Go on, one vote this too.
I suspect that in short order you will receive more neg votes and that will further dent your already crippled reputation.
I shall rise above this, as I will not one vote you, for I am a grown up, not a tantrum filled child.------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
|
|
|
|
|
You are an abusive user to me. Where is Chris Maunder?modified on Monday, February 8, 2010 5:04 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Cpianism wrote: chris mandour
I know not of this chris mandour of whom you speak.
Certainly if it is a name, it ought to have majusculed primary characters, and second, it should be spelt correctly.
Twat------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
|
|
|
|
|
Abusive User. Chris needed to take care of this.
|
|
|
|
|
You are the abusive and rude one, fancy spelling his name wrong!
And all that one voting, very silly isn't it.
Now go and get a life, loser.------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
|
|
|
|
|
Just ignore him, Dave. 
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
|
|
|
|
|
In the vain hope he goes away?
I just could not believe he wanted his own postings covered up.
He claims it was 'Private', if so, why post them on a public forum?
Hey ho, you are probably right. ------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
|
|
|
|
|
Cpianism wrote:If something I did then it is personal
Nothing you do on the internet is personal. You brought it to the public, now please don't cry. Anyway, what's so bad? I think his signature is quite funny. And if you don't like it, why not just send him a friendly message, asking him to remove it? But instead of doing that, you are bringing it to public again, so you have again a reason to complain.
|
|
|
|
|
keefb is not attacking you. He has, as others have pointed out, placed an abbreviated transcript of a discussion between yourself and myself in his sig. Technically it's not an attack and not abusive, but it's clear that it was written in order to have a little poke at you.
He's only quoting, not making any comments on the discussion, so I'm not going to force him to do anything. I would much rather keefb didn't have that signature, but I would like, even better, for you and everyone else to settle down.
The more you complain about everything the more you fuel the guys to give you a hard time. Just let it slide, move along, and things will quieten down.cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
| Done. Antoine de Saint-Exupery Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away
|
|
|
|
|
My part with keefb is done, but I still want the apology from dalek.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: quieten down
"quienten" down? Is this somen sorten of revengen for usingen gotten whenever I geten the chancen?
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
| I think some of the language from the Superbowl commentators done gone sunk in a little too deep. cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
A couple of things:
1) Since you have brought attention to it, I suspect more people have read that you have negative reputation points.
2) Since the original discussion was publicly broadcast to the world, it can hardly be an attack to quote you, particularly when it is not out of context.
3) The truth is not considered an attack in law - for the simple reason that it is the truth. If you don't want it to be public knowledge, don't point at it an shout in a public forum!If Barbie is so popular, why do you have to buy her friends?
Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.
If at first you don't succeed, destroy all evidence that you tried.
|
|
|
|
|
Didn't you read my previous post??? This issue had been handled when keefb deleted his sig.
|
|
|
|
|
If it weren't for the signature character limit, I'd have that in my signature, too..45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
In the mentioned page (http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleModifyRequest.aspx[^]), it is suggested to use gif/jpeg and file size as small as possible.
As most of images included in articles are screenshots, I would suggest:
- For screenshots (dialogs), use PNG, it has 100% quality and great compression for flat color areas.
- For photos or dialogs with photos, use JPG, it will compress better.
I would not recommend GIF. A standard GIF palette will produce noticeable color dithering.Best regards,
Jaime.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
