|
Luc Pattyn wrote: you could avoid postbacks/AJAX when "slow connection" is checked.
I'm not sure what exactly you're suggesting here, but I read recently that ajax has generally improved performance for the poor saps on dialup because they didn't have to reload the entire page any longer.
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
yes, but what we were discussing is adding new functionality ("smart pasting") that will increase traffic:
the Internet connection permitting, we would apply server-side logic on every paste you perform in a CP message/article/whatever editor, whereas right now pasting is a client-side matter only, unless it looks like a hyperlink.
|
|
|
|
|
Yup, it's hiring time[^] for the home based workers again.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
When posting an alternate Tip/Trick shouldn't it rather be in the users Tip/Tricks section rather than the Quick Questions Answered?
If at first you don't succeed, you're not Chuck Norris.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes sir. I'll add it to the bug list.
|
|
|
|
|
It seems we need to address voting abuse in the Tips/Tricks, as well as Quick Answers...
Further, voting on tips/tricks should NOT affect your average article score BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT THE SAME THING.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
I think we should just make the votes be displayed publicly for all technical forums and publications (articles, quick question answers, tips/tricks, etc.,).
We should also be able to remove spurious votes (of course, "spurious" should be something that the community would agree with). I don't know how can this be done, but the cowardly low votes can be irritating, no matter if it's on an article, answer on a technical forum or quick answer system, etc., It can discourage a potential contributor from participating.
Thins like the lounge, soapbox, etc., can maintain privacy anonymity of votes so the cowards can rejoice. On the other hand, I also think that some posts on the leisurely discussion forums like lounge begs for one votes (and to be removed), so in which cases we can't expect people to come and explain why they voted 1. It could be bleeding obvious. But it isn't the same with contributions to the community in any way and so low votes on contributions should be justified.
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
modified on Wednesday, January 13, 2010 1:57 PM
|
|
|
|
|
1's and 2's are indicated via the "My Vote of x" message that it forces you to leave (unless you know how to vote that way without leaving a message).
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
IMO all votes for articles, tips/tricks, quick questions, should require a message; I see little value in anonymous or unexplained votes, whether high or low.
in fact I would make the vote buttons available only on the reply editor page (the article/TT/QA page should say "you can vote on the reply editor page"); and I would set a low treshold for "vote to remove this message" to become effective.
OTOH I don't mind (and probably prefer) forum voting to remain as it is, anonymous, no message required, for programming and non-programming forums.
|
|
|
|
|
At least the article votes should contain a comment. If i get 11 votes of 5 and a single vote of 1 on an article i would at least like to know the reason. This kind of article bashing is quite demotivating. I would also like to be able to review my own votes by having a list of articles i voted on and how. This way i could correct my own votes in case articles improve.
modified on Thursday, January 14, 2010 5:23 PM
|
|
|
|
|
I got voted one for what I think was no reason. I thought it was a nice little tip / trick.
But then that was my opinion and not someone else's.
| There are only 10 types of people in this world — those who understand binary, and those who don't. |
|
|
|
|
|
We need to put in place the "add a comment" thing for the tips, and we'll separate the average ratings for the different types of articles.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
What is the total number of messages in all forums in CP?
|
|
|
|
|
Cpianism wrote: What is the total number of messages in all forums in CP?
Why did you post this drivel here? How exactly is this a suggestion for the betterment of this community?!
Just please get lost forever.
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cpianism wrote:
It helps in statistics.
Ouh, great idea. That way, on the entry page a message could be displayed, saying "Codeproject: total number of messages: 2,653,748. Messages posted by "Teh" Cpianism: 166. That's an overall-bullshit level of approx. 0.0063 %! (Posts from the past done under different names not factored in.)"
|
|
|
|
|
My rep points on the Question Answers Forum and the Graph don't seem to tally anymore.
| There are only 10 types of people in this world — those who understand binary, and those who don't. |
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, they do tally, but the graph seems to be several steps behind what the reputation value in quick answers is showing (which appears to be the higher of the two).
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
There working on it 
See here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
These should be in sync.. we'll look into it. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Ah...things are back in sync.
Thanks.
| There are only 10 types of people in this world — those who understand binary, and those who don't. |
|
|
|
|
|
please:
1. eradicate http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/View.aspx?mid=6855313[^]
2. fix the first rule in "How to get an answer to your question" everywhere:
"Choose the correct forum for your message. Posting a VB.NET question in the C++ forum will end in tears."
to state clearly "pick one and only one forum"
[ADDED]
3. Another one[^], a severe recidivist even.
[/ADDED]
TIA
modified on Wednesday, January 13, 2010 8:46 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Seconded!
MVP 2010 - are they mad?
|
|
|
|
|
did you misvote by any chance?
Richard MacCutchan wrote: are they mad?
have a look at this person[^]'s rep then.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
