|
For everything other than logins, yes. We did not store login dates for members previously so we do not have all this information available.
We do have ways of guessing when you logged in, and will work to retroactively update participation login points as we can
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Web 16 is in need of the same treatment as here[^]
Same bug 
(Hmmm paste bug doesn't seem to happen on Web17)
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Tom
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I bet your starting to feel like a shrink 
|
|
|
|
|
I just edited
http://www.cod[^]eproject.com/answers/51625/The-underlying-connection-was-closed.aspx
Paste bug is back? I'm on web15, chrome 3
K this is getting weirder with the second. I can't paste the link and even worse when I try to put an enter before the link the above happens (seems like there is an attempt to auto-format but it cuts the link)
Now as to the bug I was going to post:
I just edited this[^] question and noticed my editor points where 4. I remembered them to be 2 so went to check my profile[^] and that does say 2.
K first I thought the reputation on my profile was a bit slow so went on with checking the quick answers and saw another question that could do with some editing. Edited it and now my editor points remain 4 in the quick answer and in my profile it is still 2.
So something is going wrong there.
modified on Wednesday, January 13, 2010 11:12 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Smells like caching, your graph is showing 4 now.
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah that was my first thought as well but it should be 6 or 8 by now (last edited a question over 4 hours ago so caching should have caught up by now)
And my answers / edits on the quick answers board showed a different number than the one on my reputation (also a wrong one) so...
|
|
|
|
|
We'll take a closer look at this. Thanks for the report!
|
|
|
|
|
I am also observing similar situation. I check the all reputation types count on my reputation graph and the count is 773 but if I see the reputation count here[^] It is 797.
Is it a bug or I am unaware of something. I even tried deleting entire cache and reloading the page again.
"Progress isn't made by early risers. It's made by lazy men trying to find easier ways to do something." Robert Heinlein
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmm interesting. I'll add that to the bug list!
|
|
|
|
|
Are the number of Silverlight articles growing to a figure where we can have a "Best Silverlight article of the month"? Or maybe we can club WPF and Silverlight articles together and say "Best WPF / Silverlight article of the month". Thoughts, anyone?
| There are only 10 types of people in this world — those who understand binary, and those who don't. |
|
|
|
|
|
It's too narrow a field, unfortunately.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: too narrow a field
WPF / Silverlight narrow?
Oh, well  .
| There are only 10 types of people in this world — those who understand binary, and those who don't. |
|
|
|
|
|
Until more articles are being written for it yes.
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
How about giving the user a choice of viewing the total history or just the current year.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
We have a date range picker partially implemented. It's a lower priority than some of the other tasks we're currently working on but we will get to it.
|
|
|
|
|
I think you you simply give a few options (radio buttons):
All
This year
This month
...and that would be quite enough. No need to make it so flexible that it's a paint to code.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
Adding the date selectors is the easy part. There is some update logic that has a bug and so we've sidelined it for a couple of days while we get out some more urgent stuff.
We'll do it, we're just prioritising as best we can.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
No rush, Chris. I "still" remember back in the "old days" when Code Project didn't even have a reputation graph.
|
|
|
|
|
I got an email in regards to this[^] message (the original post that became suggestions/todo was mine), but the message body referred to "Article "Timestamps"". I assume that was my original message subject, but:
0) It should say "quick answer", not "article".
1) Why isn't it using the current subject instead of the months old one?
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the report. We'll add those to the bug list.
|
|
|
|
|
Why Article version is automatically incremented though I have marked "Work in Progress - do not make public" chekbox before publising article?
Today I have posted one article
Exploring Caching : Using Caching Application Enterprise Library 4.1[^]
Check the few details of the article after making it public first time.
Version:4 (See All)
Posted: 10 Jan 2010
Updated:10 Jan 2010
Current Article version is 4 and Updated date is also “10 Jan 2010” where as the article is never been updated after Publish by Unchecked - "Work in Progress - do not make public".
I think it should be 1 during first publish (First time making public) . And any update further will increment the count. Any modify during Composing status should not be part of count.
Thanks !
Abhijit Jana | Codeproject MVP
Web Site : abhijitjana.net
Don't forget to click "Good Answer" on the post(s) that helped you.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Abhijit,
IMO it is difficult to have a version number that suits both CP and the author himself.
My articles typically include a History section where I describe logical versions, my latest article has versions 1.0, 2.0 and 2.1; if (and that is a big if) I managed to enter them correctly at the first try so I don't need editing unless I want to really change the content, CP will call that 1, 2 and 3; and later, when a CP editor kicks in, it becomes 4 (without a change in my History section).
I do understand CP wants version numbers to exist, and to go up all the time, so all versions can be identified; that is useful for the readers once published, and probably is also useful for the author(s) while composing. Remember, one can compose an article with more than one author.
I would however very much prefer a system where CP suggests a version number (a composite one as in major.minor), and allows it to be bumped up. In my proposal, it would start at 0.1, and go through 0.2, 0.3, ... while composing (yes, a problem arises after 0.9); then it would become 1.0 when published, later 1.1, 1.2, etc when edited again. If and when the author decides to bump the version, he should be able to do so; so editing 1.2 would suggest 1.3 but allow it to be bumped to 2.0; and a CP editor just editing it would keep the major number, unless that was zero (so 1.2 becomes 1.3, but 0.2 becomes 1.0). Having a strict algorithm allows authors to maintain an accurate history section.
|
|
|
|
|
It's a problem of semantics.
I'm going to change the word "Version" to "Revision" to reflect that it's the number of the article revision, not the code's version release number.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
or mere "silver" members who have a "personality" ?
thanks, Bill
"Many : not conversant with mathematical studies, imagine that because it [the Analytical Engine] is to give results in numerical notation, its processes must consequently be arithmetical, numerical, rather than algebraical and analytical. This is an error. The engine can arrange and combine numerical quantities as if they were letters or any other general symbols; and it fact it might bring out its results in algebraical notation, were provisions made accordingly." Ada, Countess Lovelace, 1844
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
