Bugs and Suggestions

10-Dec-09 5:02

If you view the source of this page, you'll note that the hamsters aren't being clever at all... the less thans and greater thans are still there. It is the browser that's eating them at its whim.

Unable to cast object of type '<JoinIterator>d__61`4[System.Data.DataRow,System.Data.DataRow,System.Int32,<>f__AnonymousType0`1[System.Int32]]' to type 'System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable`1[System.Data.DataRow]'.

Re: Angle brackets being handled inconsistantly in inline code

Chris Maunder10-Dec-09 9:50

Re: Angle brackets being handled inconsistantly in inline code

10-Dec-09 9:50

Thanks. You just saved me some typing Smile | :)

cheers,
Chris Maunder

The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP

AspDotNetDev10-Dec-09 12:57

10-Dec-09 12:57

No problemo Smile | :)

Re: Angle brackets being handled inconsistantly in inline code

Dan Neely11-Dec-09 2:20

Dan Neely

11-Dec-09 2:20

but isn't being smarter than the idiots who write the html rendering engines 99% of the job of being a web dev? Poke tongue | ;-P

3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18

Re: Angle brackets being handled inconsistantly in inline code

Luc Pattyn10-Dec-09 3:04

Luc Pattyn

10-Dec-09 3:04

I'n curious why we should use > at all; it seems to me using < instead of < is quite sufficient, > isn't anything special without a preceding <

Which also means we do not really need the > widget, my guess is it exists only to avoid someone wondering about it if it weren't there.

Confused | :confused:

Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]

I only read code that is properly indented, and rendered in a non-proportional font; hint: use PRE tags in forum messages

Re: Angle brackets being handled inconsistantly in inline code

Luc Pattyn9-Dec-09 12:41

Luc Pattyn

9-Dec-09 12:41

yes there is some inconsistency: in my experience when a letter follows the < it is considered a potential HTML tag and gets eaten, whereas spaces, digits, equal signs and other special symbols that could not possibly result in a valid HTML tag are left unmodified.

An acceptable fix seems to be: include a space after the <

Smile | :)

Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]

I only read code that is properly indented, and rendered in a non-proportional font; hint: use PRE tags in forum messages

About LogOn.aspx?rp= querystring

uzunyusuf9-Dec-09 10:21

uzunyusuf

9-Dec-09 10:21

<a href="http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/LogOn.aspx?rp=%2fscript%2fMembership%2fLogOn.aspx%3frp%3d%252fscript%252fMembership%252fLogOn.aspx%253frp%253d%25252findex.aspx">http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/LogOn.aspx?rp=%2fscript%2fMembership%2fLogOn.aspx%3frp%3d%252fscript%252fMembership%252fLogOn.aspx%253frp%253d%25252findex.aspx</a>[<a href="http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/LogOn.aspx?rp=%2fscript%2fMembership%2fLogOn.aspx%3frp%3d%252fscript%252fMembership%252fLogOn.aspx%253frp%253d%25252findex.aspx" target="_blank" title="New Window">^</a>]

As you can see when i click sign in button at the top, that page is using the rp(requested page something like this) querystring. But if i enter the wrong password (i didnt try the email but i think that should same) rp querystring is getting more longer. If i click 10 times it should like 20-30 lines in here...

fyi

uzunyusuf9-Dec-09 10:27

uzunyusuf

9-Dec-09 10:27

And also this is not group account but my image is showng me group now. I changed my account type one time from settings and changed to member again. Is there any communicate problem settings between forums Smile | :)

Chris Maunder9-Dec-09 10:29

9-Dec-09 10:29

Your account had been setup as a group. I've fixed that

cheers,
Chris Maunder

The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP

Chris Maunder9-Dec-09 10:28

9-Dec-09 10:28

Is that a subtle hint that we need to optimise this a little? Wink | ;)

cheers,
Chris Maunder

The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP

Weird message when browsing to ASP.NET knowledgebase

uzunyusuf9-Dec-09 11:17

uzunyusuf

9-Dec-09 11:17

Unfortunately, i couldnt find a good solution. But i think its better(may be not Smile | :)

) than rawurl:
Request.Path.Replace(Request.ApplicationPath, "")
As you see we cannot keep the querystrings in here. It just keeps the last page.
If you want to take back again your querystrings, you should write a new method for rp.
Im working on same problem in my project Smile | :)

HimanshuJoshi8-Dec-09 21:55

HimanshuJoshi

8-Dec-09 21:55

When we open page http://www.codeproject.com/KB/aspnet[^]. It displays a message-box which says

"You can not send more email. Go to Pricing..."

Originally caught by CP@Work[^]

More Info: Weird message when browsing to ASP.NET knowledgebase

CP@work8-Dec-09 21:59

CP@work

8-Dec-09 21:59

The pop-up messagebox is related to a user's question[^]

Re: Weird message when browsing to ASP.NET knowledgebase

Chris Maunder9-Dec-09 5:10

Suggestion: Last online date/time in who's who section

9-Dec-09 5:10

Thanks, fixed

cheers,
Chris Maunder

The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP

_Damian S_8-Dec-09 17:01

Re: Suggestion: Last online date/time in who's who section

8-Dec-09 17:01

As the title says... suggestion is for some kind of last online/last post date (or whatever's more convenient for you to implement) in the display section of who's who... ie: member since 1/1/1900, last online 2/1/1900.

I don't have ADHD, I have ADOS... Attention Deficit oooh SHINY!!

Booger Mobile (n) - A bright green 1964 Ford Falcon - our entry into the Camp Quality esCarpade!!
Do something wonderful - make a donation to Camp Quality today!!

AspDotNetDev8-Dec-09 17:05

8-Dec-09 17:05

Not sure I like this idea. Do we really need to turn CP into Facebook/MySpace? Seems like an invasion of privacy. Although, you can almost infer that information from the Reputation graph (points are added for logging on on any given day). And as far as last post date, you can look at the member's "Messages Posted" page. The message listed at the top will be the most recent post (the date is shown by it).

Re: Suggestion: Last online date/time in who's who section

_Damian S_8-Dec-09 17:25

Re: Suggestion: Last online date/time in who's who section

8-Dec-09 17:25

aspdotnetdev wrote:
Seems like an invasion of privacy.

No more so than allowing me to see your profile or your messages posted anyway... would just save me having to click into each profile to see it...

AspDotNetDev8-Dec-09 17:34

8-Dec-09 17:34

_Damian S_ wrote:
No more so than allowing me to see your profile or your messages posted anyway

What you see on my profile is what I have chosen to let you see (for example, I have a picture of Wikipedia rather than my own mugshot). And with messages posted, you could only see the date of my last message posted; that information is available freely to anybody who happens to notice when you posted that message anyway. It's last login date that seems a little excessive to me.

Re: Suggestion: Last online date/time in who's who section

_Damian S_8-Dec-09 17:39

Re: Suggestion: Last online date/time in who's who section

8-Dec-09 17:39

Feisty today, aren't we?

AspDotNetDev8-Dec-09 17:44

8-Dec-09 17:44

Am I usually not feisty? Have you been watching me? Are you stalking me? Unsure | :~

Definitely don't give this person the ability to see when I've last logged on! (although the answer is invariably "today")

Re: Suggestion: Last online date/time in who's who section

_Damian S_8-Dec-09 17:50

Re: Suggestion: Last online date/time in who's who section

8-Dec-09 17:50

aspdotnetdev wrote:
Am I usually not feisty?

It comes and goes...

aspdotnetdev wrote:
Have you been watching me?

Why do you ask? Have you seen me?

aspdotnetdev wrote:
Are you stalking me?

Shhhhhhhhhh... You're giving the game away...

Chris Maunder8-Dec-09 17:10

Re: Suggestion: Last online date/time in who's who section

8-Dec-09 17:10

I'm not keen on it for the same reasons as aspdotnetdev. However, I'll let the community decide via votes.

cheers,
Chris Maunder

The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP

_Damian S_8-Dec-09 17:26

Re: Suggestion: Last online date/time in who's who section

8-Dec-09 17:26

No worries... was just a thought... it may have been lonely... rofl...

Personally I think it would be interesting, as there are a gazillion users, many of whom you never hear from... are they lurking, or just not around any more???

AspDotNetDev8-Dec-09 17:30

8-Dec-09 17:30

_Damian S_ wrote:
are they lurking, or just not around any more

Seems like their choice to not tell you that. Speaking of choice, wouldn't be a terrible idea to add this as an optional feature. Meaning it can be turned on and off. Probably would want it off by default.