|
|
I have a numericUpDown1 control who have the max=100, min=0, and increment=10; so when I change the values it increment/decrement by 10 each time, right. Now, I want a thinghie, that when it reach 10, the increment change to 1, under the value of 10. Over the value of 10, it must resume to the default increment ( of 10).
I must press 2 times when it reach the value
of 10,to really increment to 20.
It stop and I must do a second click at that point then it work properly.
This is a little bug I wish to solve.
here is the working variant:
if (numericUpDown1.Value <= 11)
{numericUpDown1.Increment = 1;}
else
{numericUpDown1.Increment = 10;}
if (numericUpDown1.Value = = 11)
{
numericUpDown1.Value -= 1;
numericUpDown1.Increment = 10;
}
modified on Monday, September 28, 2009 6:20 PM
|
|
|
|
|
Try:
int lastValue = 0;
private void numericUpDown1_ValueChanged(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
if (this.numericUpDown1.Value < 10)
{
this.numericUpDown1.Increment = 1;
}
else
{
this.numericUpDown1.Increment = 10;
}
if ((this.numericUpDown1.Value == 10) && (this.lastValue > 10))
{
this.numericUpDown1.Increment = 1;
}
this.lastValue = (int)this.numericUpDown1.Value;
}
I have assumed that you code came from the ValueChanged event handler, if not please let us know which method it comes from.
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
|
|
|
|
|
You have assumed correct. It worked like a charm.
____
there is though, a little bug remained: when I play around of value 10, it still become 11. After it become 11 it decrement with 10 and jump to number 1 directly. how to clean this up?
(when I am at value 10, I go up to 20, then go down back to 10, and when I click to go up again it transform to 11).
____
if ((numericUpDown1.Value == 10) && (lastValue > 10))
{
numericUpDown1.Increment = 1;
}
lastValue = (int)numericUpDown1.Value;
very nice conversion shortcut.
thank you very much.
modified on Tuesday, September 29, 2009 4:33 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
I had a play around with this last night too - I didn't post because I couldn't make code I was totally happy with. Something always felt messy...
To be honest I've always avoided this control, I'd rather roll my own so I have more control. If it had a ValueChanging event with CancelEventArgs it would be a great improvement as invalid/not required values shouldn't get to the Value in the first place. For situations like this an integer based one as opposed to decimal would be a help too.
Maybe I'll make one and do an article... need a few extra hours in the day!
|
|
|
|
|
Couldn't agree more. Not one of M$s better controls. Some time ago I discovered a version where the up/down buttons had individual click events with cancellabilityness, which was useful, although needless to say I am unable to find it now.
As you rightly say, a ValueChanging event with cancel would solve most of its problems.
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
this seems to work well for clicks, arrow up/downs, and pastes.
The assumptions are:
- value, min and max are integer numbers within the int range
- the initial value is below 10
private void nud_ValueChanged(object sender, EventArgs e) {
decimal newValue=nud.Value;
if (newValue>10) {
bool incrementing=nud.Tag==null?true:nud.Value>(decimal)nud.Tag;
newValue=((int)newValue/10)*10;
if (incrementing) newValue+=10;
}
nud.Tag=newValue;
nud.Value=newValue;
}
The state (old value) isn't kept in Increment (which I don't touch), it is in Tag.
Bonus: works fine for other increment values, although it may surprise around 10 (e.g. 0,3,6,9,20)
Luc Pattyn
Local announcement (Antwerp region): Lange Wapper? Neen!
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I am not really sure how I want to do this and I am looking for some suggestions.
I have a sql table and this table "A" and it has 3 text values and an ID and it is bound to 3 text boxes with the id left unbound to the form.
I then have a table "B" that has a 1 to n relationship with the "A" table and it has 2 text boxes and the id to table A and its own ID (this is the table I am not sure how to handle)
Next I have table "C" which has a 1 to n relationship with table "B" on here I have a couple text fields, a decimal field which will be bound to a datagridview.
On a single form I need to display Table A(which is straight forward), B and inside this area i will have the 2 text fields and the datagridview which is actually Table C
I was thinking either tabs or docking panels. The only issue is I am just using the controls from .net
Table B however cannot be a grid.
Thanks
modified on Monday, September 28, 2009 5:01 PM
|
|
|
|
|
Just a thought.
Take a look at Microsoft Power Packs 3.0[^]. It includes a DataRepeater Control, which has similar functionality to the old VB (Pre .NET) one, if you remember that?
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
|
|
|
|
|
That may work my only issue is I am using Visual C Sharp express and I do not have the VB Express installed.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, VB.Net Express is a free download. Also if my memory serves the Power Packs download includes the binaries. (can't guarantee that, I downloaded it some time ago. )
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
|
|
|
|
|
hi
i pick some rows in datagrid, how i can mark them ?
(show blue mark on each row)
i work in C# - windows mobile
thank's in advance
|
|
|
|
|
If you actually mean DataGridView than look at How to: Set Alternating Row Styles for the Windows Forms DataGridView Control[^], which should give you enough to get started.
If you do actually mean DataGrid then take a look at DataGrid Formatting[^].
For future reference you should make it clear exactly which type of DataGrid you are talking about. Also you could have saved us all some time by googling this yourself.
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reflector ( Here[^] ) has a class diagramming add-on ( 100% Reflective Class Diagram Creation Tool[^] ), as well as dependency graph generators and loads of other goodies.
Excellent tool.
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
|
|
|
|
|
Hey Henry, first thanks for the reply...
I know both tools, but they dont help me, I need an software that generates non existing interfaces, so i can apply them on classes that has no implementation.
Ones again, thanks for the reply.
With great code, comes great complexity, so keep it simple stupid... 
|
|
|
|
|
I have an unmanaged function with a signature as follows:
func1(unsigned __int16 arg1, unsigned __int16 arg2, unsigned __int16** arg3);
now this is being called in the correctly working unmanaged code as:
{
unsigned __int16 arg1;
unsigned __int16 arg2;
unsigned __int16* arg3;
unsigned int test;
....
test = func1(arg1, arg2, &arg3));
.........
.........
}
I have imported the function(func1()) in the managed c# code as:
[DllImport("SomeDLL.dll", EntryPoint = "func1")]
unsafe public static extern uint func1(UInt32 arg1, UInt32 arg2, out UInt32* arg3);
And I am calling this function in my code as:
{
........
UInt32 arg1;
UInt32 arg2;
UInt32* arg3;
uint test;
...........
test = func1(arg1, arg2, out arg3);
............
/* I am using arg3 value over here*/
if(arg3[0] == null)
{
....
}
}
Now my problem is, in the unmanaged code when I access the arg3[0], it gives me a value, but in the managed code it gives me a pointer, to elaborate:
When I watch arg3 in the watch window in unmanaged code it shows as an array with the arg3 as a pointer and its 0 index value just as a value:
Name Value
- arg3 0x0F031321
arg3 1
in managed code it is:
Name Value
- arg3 0x000000000F031321
*arg3 490799104
notice that in the drop down list above the unmanaged code simply has arg3 in the second line whereas the managed code has *arg3. So my guess is in the latter the first value of the array is a pointer.
Even when I import the function as:
[DllImport("SomeDLL.dll", EntryPoint = "func1")]
unsafe public static extern uint func1(UInt32 arg1, UInt32 arg2, UInt32** arg3);
and call it as:
{
........
UInt32 arg1;
UInt32 arg2;
UInt32* arg3;
uint test;
...........
test = func1(arg1, arg2, &arg3);
............
}
Again, I have the same problem in the managed code.
Can someone please point the errors in my marshaling, and suggest some solutions.
Appreciate all the help.
modified on Monday, September 28, 2009 4:06 PM
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
two questions:
1. if the unmanaged items are unsigned __int16, why are you modeling them as UInt32???
2. what is the purpose of arg3? it looks like an array, now who is going to allocate it? and who is going to read it and write it? My suggestion will depend on this.
Luc Pattyn
Local announcement (Antwerp region): Lange Wapper? Neen!
|
|
|
|
|
1. if the unmanaged items are unsigned __int16, why are you modeling them as UInt32???
I am just following an example where the functions that have been imported and are successfully working are using UInt32 for similar signatures. Does this make a difference though? Since it is going to be implicitly converted.
2. what is the purpose of arg3? it looks like an array, now who is going to allocate it? and who is going to read it and write it? My suggestion will depend on this.
arg3 is going to be allocated by the unmanaged code (I guess so, though it is defined in the managed code, as I showed in the code snippet), it is written by the unmanaged function in the DLL whose code/implementation I do not possess. The managed code that I am writing should be able to access/read the arg3 array data, e.g.; if(arg3[0] == null){...}.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
1.
yes it can generate correct results, but it isn't a good habit. And it would go wrong if you did similar things with other type pairs, e.g. float and double. I expect it would also cause problems with arrays. 
2.
AFAIK managed code can't accept an unmanaged array simply by applying a couple of * or & symbols.
This is the only way I know would work:
- declare an IntPtr variable
- accept the pointer as a "ref IntPtr" or "out IntPtr"
- create a managed array of correct size
- use Marshal.Copy to copy the data from the IntPtr (=unmanaged data) to the new, managed array
FYI: I very much prefer the approach where the managed code creates an array, passes it (as a pointer) to the unmanaged side, which fills it; that however is not how your unmanaged code works right now.
Luc Pattyn
Local announcement (Antwerp region): Lange Wapper? Neen!
|
|
|
|
|
Time to get published, I think!
|
|
|
|
|
My article as of yet wouldn't really help here, as this is a situation I advise against. I suggest objects (and hence arrays) be created on the managed side. I might add my suggestion into the article though.
Luc Pattyn
Local announcement (Antwerp region): Lange Wapper? Neen!
|
|
|
|
|
I did as follows:
DllImport("SomeDLL.dll", EntryPoint = "func1")]
unsafe public static extern uint func1(UInt32 arg1, UInt32 arg2, ref IntPtr arg3);
And I am calling this function in my code as:
{
........
UInt32 arg1;
UInt32 arg2;
IntPtr arg3 = IntPtr.Zero; //made arg3 as Intptr
int [] managedArray = new int[1]; //created a managed array
uint test;
...........
test = func1(arg1, arg2, ref arg3);
............
/* I am using arg3 value over here*/
Marshal.Copy(arg3, managedArray, 0, 1);
if(managedArray[0] == null)
{
....
}
}
When I watch the managedArray[0] now, it still shows the values as before, kind of garbage values.
I am just writing a single value in the array (as indicated by the last param of Marshal.Copy because only one value is of interest).
Single indirection with out didn't help either.
modified on Monday, September 28, 2009 4:06 PM
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
your code seems fine, it is what I would do given your description of the situation at hand.
except for the "I am using arg3 value over here" comment which doesn't fit the following line...
To debug, I would set up a slightly larger experiment, that generates say some 10 to 100 numbers of known value (mostly different), and dump the results to see if anything throws and/or anything gets recognized; I tend to use hex notation for debugging, and logging (i.e. write to console or file, not rely on watch windows).
If that doesn't help, I would allocate a managed array, fill it with numbers 1...N and pass its pointer (using GCHandle) to the native side, then watch the array when it returns.
[ADDED]
BTW: when copying the data from an unmanaged to a managed object/array, you now have two objects; you should not forget to get rid of the unmanaged object somehow (i.e. if the native code did a malloc, you should call a function that performs a free).
[/ADDED]
Luc Pattyn
Local announcement (Antwerp region): Lange Wapper? Neen!
modified on Monday, September 28, 2009 4:03 PM
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
