|
Hi All
i need to write some data in excel file.I user CBasicExcel but in this calss memory leak problem.There is any more class.
Thanks in advance
|
|
|
|
|
I didn't see any memory leaks in CBasicExcel. Chances are that you're misusing it.
It is a crappy thing, but it's life -^ Carlo Pallini
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Subramanian
if you see in the article <pre>CBasicExcel</pre> FAQ then you have found too many question about Memory leak and LongFile.
|
|
|
|
|
where can I found documentation of that class in msdn
Trioum
|
|
|
|
|
i think you should ask that question from author of CBasicExcel.
|
|
|
|
|
who is author and please forward me link
Trioum
|
|
|
|
|
|
Did you actually experience memory leaks while using it, or are you just going by some comments in the page?
The article updates section says that memory leaks were fixed. However, I've used the said class in a few instances and I did not find any memory leaks. May be I did not use it extensively enough, but it was sufficient for my purposes. You might as well want to try XLW (just google it).
It is a crappy thing, but it's life -^ Carlo Pallini
|
|
|
|
|
Ok Can any one tell how can i use
XLW
Plz help me.I need forum member help
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
XLW has a mailing list, which you can use to obtain help with using it. Take a look at the following page for more information: http://sourceforge.net/projects/xlw/support[^]
It is a crappy thing, but it's life -^ Carlo Pallini
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks
Subramanian
But i havnn't found any topic How to use Xlw.If it's possible then give me step.How to write data in excel through XLW.
please help.
|
|
|
|
|
rdop wrote: Thanks
You're welcome. 
rdop wrote: But i havnn't found any topic How to use Xlw.If it's possible then give me step.How to write data in excel through XLW.
Use the link that I gave to you in my previous post. There is a mailing list, that you will have to join and you can discuss stuff related to XLW (including asking for technical help) in it.
It is a crappy thing, but it's life -^ Carlo Pallini
|
|
|
|
|
hello Friends
I m creating a one dlu for 3dsmax using INode* root_node,when i use this root_node in my current Dlu then i m able to getting its values by excessing its function that r returning right values.
But when I creat another dll and in that in tht dll I create one function tht i m exporting and passing this INode object to that dll.That object is not null there but when i try to excess some values by using its function then it returns nothing.
Do u hv any Solution?
thanks & Regards
Yogesh
|
|
|
|
|
Your question is obscure, give more details.
Easy Profiler : a compile-time profiler for C++
www.potatosoftware.com
|
|
|
|
|
how can I use one classs function in second dll and they r defined in first dll?
|
|
|
|
|
I think it suffices to declare it as an export class. That's all. There should not be any problem.
Give me code so I can see.
Easy Profiler : a compile-time profiler for C++
www.potatosoftware.com
|
|
|
|
|
Hi ,
Is there away for getting hidden memory physical start address in the user mode.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
What do you mean by hidden memory ?
|
|
|
|
|
hidden memory == burn memory of RAM in the PC
|
|
|
|
|
ta_isr wrote: Is there away for getting hidden memory physical start address...
Of what?
"Old age is like a bank account. You withdraw later in life what you have deposited along the way." - Unknown
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
|
|
|
|
|
Of hidden memory (burn memory)
|
|
|
|
|
If you are looking for a usermode version of MmGetPhysicalAddress[^] to obtain physical memory addresses then there are no official/reliable methods. NT based operating systems are running in protected mode and the CR3 register cannot be accessed from usermode. There are some available hacks using but even those are OS dependent.
Best Wishes,
-David Delaune
|
|
|
|
|
David,
Thanks for your answer , that is exactly what I'm looking for.
Can you direct me those "available hacks using but even those are OS dependent." ?
|
|
|
|
|
Just google for the 0xFFFF000 and 0x1FFFF000 masks. The other techniques I described rely on kernel objects that are always allocated at the same physical offset. I do not feel comfortable describing these security flaws on a public forum. Unfortunately your on your own.
Best Wishes,
-David Delaune
|
|
|
|
|
I tried to fined "0xFFFF000 and 0x1FFFF000 masks".
I will appreciate if you can send me a link 
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
