|
I'll take Incoherency for $500, Alex.
On a more serious note, I realize English is not your native language but what you've written here is just plain hard to understand. Try to rephrase it, our run your native language through a to-English translator and see if that helps.
"Old age is like a bank account. You withdraw later in life what you have deposited along the way." - Unknown
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
|
|
|
|
|
Believe me, in some languages where sentence constructions are absolutely different from languages like English - it is quite hard to build sentence correctly (this sentence as an example as my native language is Russian).
However - your point is stated perfectly! (will write it down for friends who work with Indian and Pakistani guys)
------------------------------------------------------------
Want to be happy - do what you like!
|
|
|
|
|
While Linux and Unix have a process tree as a result of the fork() system call, Windows does not. Every process is equal, apart from some kernel processes which can't be killed in Task Manager. Windows on the other hand (not the operating system, the GUI construct), have parents; most are children of the Desktop (hWnd:= 0, process:=explorer.exe). Considering your question, this seems more likely.
However, that's just the second line. Could you elaborate on what you mean in the last line of your question please?
Between the idea
And the reality
Between the motion
And the act
Falls the Shadow
|
|
|
|
|
Windows (the OS) does keep track of which process spawned which other process(es).
There are parent and child processes.
|
|
|
|
|
That's odd. Thanks for the correction; my answer clearly no longer applies. I'll have to do more research into that
Between the idea
And the reality
Between the motion
And the act
Falls the Shadow
|
|
|
|
|
Since I just posted a comment a few minutes ago about disc cleaning ,I thought that I might as well add another posting concerning the polling cd drive speed tweak that I had posted some months ago ,in order to try and clarify why the "1 millisecond" default setting that comes with the xp operating system has such an unnecessary and major loading effect on the overall computing processing speed of the xp operating system.
For example - the overall "system bus speed" of my Dell computer is 400 MB per second as I had stated in the original posting.
So , I think that the 400 MB per second speed should be divided by a factor of 1000 which would then produce a net "system bus speed" of .4 MB per second or in other words the real "system bus speed" is 400 KB per second unless the computer engineers should happen to say that the 400 MB per second " system bus speed" already includes the 1 millisecond default polling speed of the xp operating system and if that is the case , then:
if you increased that 1 millisecond default setting to, for example 1 second , then , I would think that you could then multiply the 400 MB "system bus speed" by a factor of 1000 that would then increase the net "system bus speed" to 400,000 MB per second or in other words 400 GB per second , at least , theorectically.
In actual operating conditions , I guess, that
the solid state componets [ram memory] upper operating speed limits would probably be somewhere between the 400 MB per second and 400 GB per second.
winch1020
|
|
|
|
|
I am going to do some more speculating on the 1 millisecond default polling value of the USB drive [ not the cd drive which I accidently wrote in my previous posting ] and its effect on the xp operating system processing speed.
Dividing the "system bus speed" by a factor of a 1000 would only apply for a worst case scenario: that is , if the computer engineers were to deliberately design the 1 millisecond polling output to Shut DOWN the complete "system bus " every millisecond when the polling circuit is turned on by the microprocessor [assuming that the polling circuit is not a separate free running oscillator running at a 1000 cycles per second - astable as opposed to monostable - a lack of synchronizing would no doubt cause to many problems , so the polling is no doubt tripped off by the microprocessor].
Even if "the total shut down "design is not opted for by the computer engineers - they could still opt to have the 1 millisecond polling increments shut down SOME of the "system bus" that is, some of the 32 bit address or 64 bit address space.
If the computer designers chose not to shut down any EXTRA parts of the system bus every millisecond and just let the 1 millisecond polling increments utilize the required amount of system bus address space it required in order to poll the USB drive --- I wonder how many BYTES per second or BYTES per millisecond of computer band width would be taken by the polling ciruit?How much system address space has to be set aside every second to process the 1 millisecond polling increments ?
I suppose that the polling ciruit has its own coded file.How large is it? Would it be a couple of thousand bytes in size or would a file the size of a couple of hundred bytes be enough to get the USB polled?
I assume that you could Multiply the Size of the Polling File by a Factor of 1000 in order to find out how many Bytes per second that the computer has to continually process.
modified on Friday, July 10, 2009 9:02 AM
|
|
|
|
|
For the past couple of months I have been using the ccleaner utility tool each time I turn on my computer to surf the internet etc , which means that the ccleaner utility is run at least once every time that I power up the computer.
I think that it is a smarter policy to run any utility tool when you first turn the computer on instead of running the tool at the end of a computer session and just before turning the computer off for the simple reason that if the computer user has happened to have been on the internet - any viruses or spyware etc that might happen to have got into the ram memory would automatically then be deleted.
I used to only use the ccleaner and the xp disc cleaner about once a week or every 2 weeks or so but I have noticed that the hard drive now goes about 10 to 20 times longer before requirng a defragging because I frequently monitor [every couple of days] the fragmented condition of the hardrive using the windows "analysis" option that is a part of the xp defragging tool. The percentage of total fragments and fragmented files is now always well below the 5% and 10% level for much longer periods of time.
winch1020
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, does anyone know which is is free to generate from ISA log file? Thank in advance!!!
|
|
|
|
|
how to get bios date from windows xp
|
|
|
|
|
CPU-Z can find it for you.
//Johannes
|
|
|
|
|
The system time reflects the BIOS data/time. If you set the time in Windows, the BIOS date/time also gets set. The opposite is also true.
|
|
|
|
|
Application log file got > 2.5 GB on production sever. so I want to switch the log file, with out
stoppping the application. I tried to rename a old one and create a new with same name, but there was sharing voliation.
Please advice
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, currently my network contain domain cotroller running windows 2003 and one e-mail server plus 30 client computer. Now I want to setup a firewall running ISA 2004 Standard Edition.
I have successfully install ISA 2004 on a new server running windows 2003. Then I try to create the rule that make ISA and my internet network could be able to communicate with each. The following rule is created:
1. Rule name: ISA to LAN
2. Action: Allow
3. Protocol: All outbound protocol
4. Source: Local Host
5. Destination: Internal (internal network card)
Then I apply the rule but when I try to ping from my ISA computer the any client in my internal network, the ping is request time out.
Does any one know how to configure its access for the above purpose?
Thank in advance!!!
|
|
|
|
|
How can v retrieve computers connected through LAN in vb.net 2003?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Who said that people in India know English?
Sorry - this is emotions only!
------------------------------------------------------------
Want to be happy - do what you like!
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I have prepared a software in .net. Kindly suggest and help me by eplaining the method to secure my software through usb using pendrive from illeagal copying and distribution.
Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
you could request the SDK from these guys http://www.esecutech.com/[^] and experiment with it - typically you bind part of their library into your app and use that to check if the dongle is there, read codes etc from the dongle
(I beleive they also have paid advertising on this site, so wait till the add comes around and click on it)
'g'
|
|
|
|
|
do u urself hav developed this s/w........  
the same s/w is developed by my friend... 
|
|
|
|
|
Dear friend,
Thanks for replying.
Plz note and try to understand. Suppose any software prepaired by us and I distribute to any one telling him for not to give any other person for use.
How can I protect our software from unauthorised use and copying by any other person before giving to any one by using USB pen drive (Like DONGAL).
J. K. Sharma
|
|
|
|
|
Good question anyway.
Will dig-in-the-web for a solution.
------------------------------------------------------------
Want to be happy - do what you like!
|
|
|
|
|
I work for small company where some of our network/IT tasks are handled by third party IT consulting firm. We have Exchange Server handling out mail. Previously we had GFI MailEssentials installed to handle spams. It is my understanding it has stood to its claims.
Just this past weekend, we came to know our license has expired and it is time to renew. The IT consulting team is suggesting we move to hardware based antispam tool from Barracuda. We don't think this is necessary and don't want to use hardware based solution for this task.
So, the questions are
1. What do you recommend for Exchange Server antispam tool?
2. Do you see any value in having hardware based solution?
Thanks for your time and input.
|
|
|
|
|
BTW - Why not to use Barracuda's solution. Exchange is Microsoft, Microsoft if main victim of viruses, Windows is a spam-networks breeder.
I'd prefer to use something not from M$! Google's mail is also good and protected from spam perfectly.
------------------------------------------------------------
Want to be happy - do what you like!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
