clickonce - C# Discussion Boards

First Prev Next

Re: Expanding String Abbreviations To Full String ( NASDAQ:INTC --> Intel Corporation)

SeMartens1-Jul-09 3:29

SeMartens

1-Jul-09 3:29

Hi
As you already mentioned store the abbrevations and the long name in the db. I would suggest using a second table, so that you can use a nested select statement to get the full name. This will enable you to use the full performance power of your relational database.

Regards
Sebastian

It's not a bug, it's a feature!

Check out my CodeProject article Permission-by-aspect.

Me in Softwareland.

Re: Expanding String Abbreviations To Full String ( NASDAQ:INTC --> Intel Corporation)

Keith Barrow1-Jul-09 3:37

Keith Barrow

1-Jul-09 3:37

Use Dictionary<string,string>. The code can be the key. This

e.g.

Dictionary<string,string> companies = new Dictionary<string,string>();


companies.Add("INTC", "Intel Corp");
....

string companyName= companies["INTC"];

Note that you can only have one code entry, but the same company name can appear next to multiple codes.

Re: Expanding String Abbreviations To Full String ( NASDAQ:INTC --> Intel Corporation)

EliottA1-Jul-09 4:25

EliottA

1-Jul-09 4:25

I don't know why this bugged me, but it does.

MagForJ wrote:
if(abrev.equals("INTC")) str = "Intel Corporation";
else if(abrev.equals("GOOG")) str = "Google Inc";

Why abbreviate "Incorporated" in "Google Inc" but not "Corporation" (Corp) in "Intel Corporation"?

Check out the CodeProject forum Guidelines[^]
The original soapbox 1.0 is back![^]

Re: Expanding String Abbreviations To Full String ( NASDAQ:INTC --> Intel Corporation)

dojohansen1-Jul-09 6:19

dojohansen

1-Jul-09 6:19

I'd definitely make it data-driven if I were you. Whether or not you should just add a column to an existing table is another matter.

In this particular case I think I'd have a look to see if I could get the data from somewhere and go from there. For example, there may be a free web service that let's you retrieve this. (This could be done at run-time, but web services are quite slow though; you probably don't want to look up a code at a time for a collection, for example.)

If you can get the data, storing it in a new table has some benefits: The descriptive string can potentially be sizeable, and adding a large column to any table, especially a small table (I've no idea what row sizes you have here), can have a significant impact on row size and thus on performance. I don't know what DB you're working with, but SQL Server has 8K pages and yet I've seen a "transaction" table (storing financial transactions, not database transactions!) that had a column defined as nvarchar(500) - that's a 1000 bytes just for this one column. That table could have millions of rows, but SQL Server couldn't get more than 6 records per page thanks to this horrible design error.

However you store the data, if it's not too substantial and you need raw speed, load it into a cache once and you should get great results.

add controls to webform

v_vidhya1-Jul-09 2:23

v_vidhya

1-Jul-09 2:23

how to add controls to webform without using placeholder or panel

Re: add controls to webform

Niladri_Biswas1-Jul-09 3:47

Niladri_Biswas

1-Jul-09 3:47

Simple.

Solution 1: Add directly to the Page Control

TextBox txt = new TextBox();
        txt.ID = "txt1";
        this.Page.Form.Controls.Add(txt);

Solution 2:

Create a DIV tag with an ID and Runat = 'Server'

In the code behind, add the dynamic control to the DIV which inturn will be added to the Page Control

TextBox txt = new TextBox();
        txt.ID = "txt1";
        divAddDynamicControlsHere.Controls.Add(txt);
        this.Page.Form.Controls.Add(divAddDynamicControlsHere);

Solution 3:Create a Table with TR & TD. Expose the TD's Id and Runat='Server'

<table>
    <tr>
    <td id="tdAddDynamicControlsHere" runat="server"></td>
    </tr>
    </table>

In the code behind, add the dynamic control to the TD which inturn will be added to the Page Control

TextBox txt = new TextBox();
        txt.ID = "txt1";
        tdAddDynamicControlsHere.Controls.Add(txt);
        this.Page.Form.Controls.Add(divAddDynamicControlsHere);

Solution 4: Use literal control

<asp:literal id="LitDynamicControl" runat="server">

In code behind

string controlText = "<html><head></head>";
        controlText += "<body><input type='txt' id='txt'></body></html>";
        LitDynamicControl.Text = controlText;

Solution 5: Well you know, PLACEHOLDER CONTROL/PANEL

Solution 6:

Using HTTP Modules [ Creating Server Controls at Runtime using HTTP Modules[^] ] - By Niladri Biswas

Hope this helps.

Vote me pls
Smile | :)

Niladri Biswas

Re: add controls to webform

v_vidhya1-Jul-09 18:38

v_vidhya

1-Jul-09 18:38

Thanks for your reply.But this didn't work.My div tag in update panel.

clickonce

arkiboys1-Jul-09 2:12

arkiboys

1-Jul-09 2:12

Hi,
I have developed an application which contains two projects.
It uses xml files which are located inside the bin folder of one of the projects.
When going through the click once, how do I tell the setup to use the xml files inside the bin folder of the project? i.e. Is there a place where I can include the xml files in the click once?
Thanks

Re: clickonce

Manas Bhardwaj1-Jul-09 2:13

Manas Bhardwaj

1-Jul-09 2:13

Read this[^]

Manas Bhardwaj
Please remember to rate helpful or unhelpful answers, it lets us and people reading the forums know if our answers are any good.

Re: clickonce [modified]

arkiboys1-Jul-09 2:27

arkiboys

1-Jul-09 2:27

Solved.
Thanks

modified on Wednesday, July 1, 2009 8:37 AM

Textbox Control function.....

Hum Dum1-Jul-09 2:07

Hum Dum

1-Jul-09 2:07

If there already exist some text in textBox, then

restrict user, so user can not delete/modify that text, but can add(append) text in to textBox. How to do this?

Soppose:
"Quick brown fox jumps" (already present in text box)

so, user can only append text, but can't modify previous text.

like:
"Quick brown fox jumps ......(only from here he can enter/append)"

regards.

Re: Textbox Control function.....

musefan1-Jul-09 2:12

musefan

1-Jul-09 2:12

Try handling the KeyPreview event and then check for 'delete/backspace' key when the current text is at a certain length (i.e. the length of the text you want to always be present). That might work

Life goes very fast. Tomorrow, today is already yesterday.

Re: Textbox Control function.....

Hum Dum1-Jul-09 2:40

Hum Dum

1-Jul-09 2:40

musefan wrote:
(i.e. the length of the text you want to always be present). That might work

I also first thought of this, but suppose if user appended some text then its lenght got increased, now he acts smart and jumps back , then he can delete as length is greater(as he adds some text)

Application is on order progress.
Where user has to update its order action/remarks?

I am fetching text from DB to textControl, and user have to update these fields.

So if user once entered some data and updated it, then next time he can only append new data, can't modify previous data.

Any help appreciated....?
Smile | :)

Re: Textbox Control function.....

musefan1-Jul-09 2:43

musefan

1-Jul-09 2:43

I knew it would have a flaw somewhere lol

what about on KeyPreview do some check using the caret position of the text box?

So keep the backspace/delete check and also add - if caret < fixed length then don't allow key press to go through

Life goes very fast. Tomorrow, today is already yesterday.

Re: Textbox Control function.....

Hum Dum1-Jul-09 2:56

Hum Dum

1-Jul-09 2:56

an example would be greatful.

or else i have to run hit and try method on my own Smile | :)

Re: Textbox Control function.....

dojohansen1-Jul-09 6:27

dojohansen

1-Jul-09 6:27

Perhaps if you build on musefan's idea but use the Tag property to store the length of the Text when the TextBox has been initialized (i.e. the "uneditable" text has been assigned to it)..? Then you always know the initial length and you can prevent it from being modified.

However, I think a better solution would be to split the UI to reflect that there's a read-only part and the user may add to this. This would make it easier to implement, and imho more logical for the end user as well.

If you do opt for a single TextBox control you may have to handle cut/copy/paste (if you select text and paste, you replace the selection) as well.

Re: Textbox Control function.....

OriginalGriff1-Jul-09 2:16

OriginalGriff

1-Jul-09 2:16

Hum Dum wrote:
How to do this?

Manually.
See TextBox.OnChange event, but be aware that this is "odd" behaviour - not what users expect from a text box. Is there no better solution you can apply, such as moving the text to a label so the TextBox is empty?

No trees were harmed in the sending of this message; however, a significant number of electrons were slightly inconvenienced.

This message is made of fully recyclable Zeros and Ones

Re: Textbox Control function.....

Hum Dum1-Jul-09 2:46

Hum Dum

1-Jul-09 2:46

OriginalGriff wrote:
moving the text to a label so the TextBox is empty?

This is one solution?
But moving whole text to a label then adding new text?

application like daily/weekly update on a task.
so text is goes on increasing?

also there are 3-4 fields where user has to add its progress,
and moving each on a seprate labe, makes things somewhat unpleasent?

can't there be any better way.....?

just user can't modify previous data?

any help appreciated....
Smile | :)

Re: Textbox Control function.....

OriginalGriff1-Jul-09 3:46

OriginalGriff

1-Jul-09 3:46

Hum Dum wrote:
But moving whole text to a label then adding new text?

application like daily/weekly update on a task.
so text is goes on increasing?

also there are 3-4 fields where user has to add its progress,
and moving each on a seprate labe, makes things somewhat unpleasent?

can't there be any better way.....?

just user can't modify previous data?

any help appreciated....

Ok, so what it is is an update of a to-do-list or similar, with the user inputing new progress?
In which case, yes it will keep increasing - what you need to do is treat each new progress update as a new record and display it in - for example - a grid control. Or better a DataGrid if you store the updates in a database, which would make sense.

No trees were harmed in the sending of this message; however, a significant number of electrons were slightly inconvenienced.

This message is made of fully recyclable Zeros and Ones

Re: Textbox Control function.....

K03061-Jul-09 2:19

K0306

1-Jul-09 2:19

Try this in TextBox Keypress event

if(textbox1.text.lenght > 0)
{
if(e.KeyChar == "backspace","Delete","shift","Home","End"
{
e.Handled = true;
}
}

Re: Textbox Control function.....

Luc Pattyn1-Jul-09 2:35

Luc Pattyn

1-Jul-09 2:35

I think that is not sufficient, the user could still use the mouse to select some text, then type new text replacing the selection.

Smile | :)

Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]

DISCLAIMER: this message may have been modified by others; it may no longer reflect what I intended, and may contain bad advice; use at your own risk and with extreme care.

Re: Textbox Control function.....

Hum Dum1-Jul-09 2:52

Hum Dum

1-Jul-09 2:52

Luc Pattyn wrote:
I think that is not sufficient, the user could still use the mouse to select some text, then type new text replacing the selection.

Yup

Application is on order progress.
Where user has to update its order action/remarks?

I am fetching text from DB to textControl, and user have to update these fields.

So if user once entered some data and updated it, then next time he can only append new data, can't modify previous data.

Luc i am seeing your replies and help from long time on this forum Smile | :)

Is there way to achieve this?

regards Smile | :)

Re: Textbox Control function.....

musefan1-Jul-09 3:06

musefan

1-Jul-09 3:06

how about each 'update' is a new entry in the database. then you use a control such as a datagridview (or make a custom one) that displays each entry along with the time and date that it was made. Much better solution

Life goes very fast. Tomorrow, today is already yesterday.

Re: Textbox Control function.....

Luc Pattyn1-Jul-09 3:38

Luc Pattyn

1-Jul-09 3:38

I would avoid having both old data that should not be changed, and new data, that the user wants to add and edit, in a single control.

Maybe have a read-only TextBox showing what is already processed, and a smaller TextBox allowing the entry (with editing) of new data plus a "Enter" button (or act on ENTER key).

And as always, I don't like Textboxes for large amounts of data, so I would prefer a ListBox or DataGridView for old data, and a Textbox (or whatever suits best) for new data.

Smile | :)

Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]

DISCLAIMER: this message may have been modified by others; it may no longer reflect what I intended, and may contain bad advice; use at your own risk and with extreme care.

WinApp access variables in WebService...?

Mtyb1-Jul-09 0:46

Mtyb

1-Jul-09 0:46

Hello,

How can i access public variables in a WebService..using the object that i create in the WinApp?
Is posible to call method at a WebService by sending its paramters by refrence..?

Thanks Smile | :)

Last Visit: 31-Dec-99 18:00 Last Update: 28-Apr-24 14:04

Refresh

ᐊ Prev 1...4785 4786 4787 478847894790 4791 4792 4793 4794 Next ᐅ

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.