|
Maybe, if you ask this in the Mobile Development forum?
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
|
|
|
|
|
I am writing a Windows.Forms application and I have a some objects that I want to be Global. Example of these objects are an object for maintaining a collection of remote resources, and a "Task list" type object that shows all running tasks. There is only ever 1 instance of these objects, they are created when the application starts and are destroyed when the application ends.
I use these objects throughout my application and inorder to do so I have to pass an "Environment" object to each form, this Environment object serves as a pointer to the global objects.
This seems very kludgy, is there a way that you can have global objects shared across the application without having to pass them to each form/thread you create?
Thanks in advance!
|
|
|
|
|
A public static class?
जय हिंद
|
|
|
|
|
But how would that help pass the object instance?
|
|
|
|
|
If I understand correctly, you need a object TaskList across the application. Assuming it has a set of properties, you can have a public static class TaskList, with all the properties needed, which will be available across the application.
If it is just a list of tasks and there are some more things of this sort, have all these as properties in a common static class and expose them as properties of type List.
Since the class would be public, you can access it anywhere in the application.
जय हिंद
|
|
|
|
|
The public static class contains the global object instance (or is the global object if you prefer).
public static class GlobalObjects
{
public static List<Task> taskList = new List<Task>();
}
...
GlobalOjects.taskList.Add(task);
...
No trees were harmed in the sending of this message; however, a significant number of electrons were slightly inconvenienced.
This message is made of fully recyclable Zeros and Ones
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, I am using EF and want to use its generated objects to be returned to the web service (By serializing it). The problem is All generated classes are inherited from EntityObject (member of System.Data) and I don't want its member to be included in the wsdl.
Please help me if anyone know the solution. Thanks in advance.
modified on Friday, June 19, 2009 3:10 AM
|
|
|
|
|
How Do I Hide MDI Menus For The Specific User For Ex. - there are two user I want some menu to hide for one user how do i hide it?
|
|
|
|
|
0. Fix your title, it does not reflect the subject.
1. Like all controls, menu items have an Enabled and a Visible property.
2. Use them consistently.
Panic, Chaos, Destruction.
My work here is done.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I have a windows application, reporting-tool, wich alows a user to create a XML that later can be generated to a Excel-File.
I am now developing a new function. The user should have the possibility to create a DLL consisting model/generator and also the created XML. By now I have splited the application into two projects:
1. The main windows application with all the forms etc.
2. The model of the excel-report and the classes which generate the report.
Now how can I create the DLL and embed the XML, and all that should be implemented in the windows application project
Thanks in advance
-Haris
|
|
|
|
|
You create an assembly by using a compiler, but I'm at a loss to understand why you are having users create them. How would the be used?
only two letters away from being an asset
|
|
|
|
|
Create an assembly by using a compiler? Could you be a bit more specific  ? 
It's a windowsapplication that uses COM-Interop to create a excelfile. The XML file has stored the definition for the report, like position of the cell, cell-content, cell-format etc.
Generation the excelreport works fine. But the next step is to create that DLL.
When the user has created that DLL he can upload it to a ASP.Net application which handels that DLL and provides the report as a download.
It has to be a DLL consisting the C#Project(model/generator) and the XML Definiton-File.
|
|
|
|
|
Haris wrote: When the user has created that DLL he can upload it to a ASP.Net application
Woah! You are allowing users to upload DLL files to a web server?! Are you nuts! Can you not see what a massive gaping security hole you are punching in the Web server? It would be like a bank saying that they want to make it easier for their customers to access their money, so here's a stick of dynamite to use if you ever need to access the vault out of hours.
|
|
|
|
|
well ... there would have been a nicer way to say that ... but ... anyway!
it's a application interface definition!
it's my part do generate the DLL ... what happens whit that DLL further -> I don't know exactly and it's not my problem.
|
|
|
|
|
Haris wrote: well ... there would have been a nicer way to say that
My primary concern was to ensure that you understood, in the quickest way possible, the severity of risk in your actions.
Haris wrote: what happens whit that DLL further -> I don't know exactly and it's not my problem.
It is your problem. You already have an idea of how it will be used. You now have an idea that it is an extremely risky solution to the problem.
|
|
|
|
|
when IE is opened, internally I have to save the page on some specified path( as C:\abc.html)
this is code trying
object pvaIn = new object();
object pvaOut = new object();
pvaIn = webBrowser.Document;
pvaOut = @"C:\abc.html";
webBrowser.ExecWB(OLECMDID.OLECMDID_SAVE, OLECMDEXECOPT.OLECMDEXECOPT_DODEFAULT, ref pvaIn, ref pvaOut);
|
|
|
|
|
And your question is?
Panic, Chaos, Destruction.
My work here is done.
|
|
|
|
|
Is there a way to prevent the VS designer to run a specific method? E.g.
[Conditional("DEBUG")]
[DebuggerStepThrough]
public void SomeMethod()
{
}
isn't run in release code. Can I write something similar for the designer?
Why is it drug addicts and computer afficionados are both called users?
--Clifford Stoll
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I would add code checking Control.DesignMode
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]
DISCLAIMER: this message may have been modified by others; it may no longer reflect what I intended, and may contain bad advice; use at your own risk and with extreme care.
|
|
|
|
|
So would I!
As an aside, when I write a control I usually derive from something like ScrollableControl or Panel. Just by doing this when I click on the .cs file visual studio opens it up in 'designer' mode. No real point to this comment, but I find it most annoying.
Regards,
Rob Philpott.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Rob,
you should have asked sooner, I found the solution years ago: just add [System.ComponentModel.DesignerCategory("Code")] right in front of your class line.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]
DISCLAIMER: this message may have been modified by others; it may no longer reflect what I intended, and may contain bad advice; use at your own risk and with extreme care.
|
|
|
|
|
Dude, you are a superstar! My life has just improved.
Regards,
Rob Philpott.
|
|
|
|
|
Be happy Microsoft leaves room for improvement...
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]
DISCLAIMER: this message may have been modified by others; it may no longer reflect what I intended, and may contain bad advice; use at your own risk and with extreme care.
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, I didn't mention that I develop WPF. Another way I found is to use DesignerProperties.GetIsInDesignMode(target).
Why is it drug addicts and computer afficionados are both called users?
--Clifford Stoll
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
