Visual Basic

private sub chkbox2_click (ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles chkbox2.Click
  msgbox "you clicked checkbox 2"
end sub

OP before modficiation
<blockquote class="FQ"><div class="FQA">Member 4514218 wrote:</div> Hello Friends,
I like to accept a string and convert the case of the characters using vb .net
eg Input String : aBcDE
Output String : ABCDE
Output String : abcde
depanding on the user selection


Thanks In Advance 
Praveen </blockquote>

My Response

Check out the <code>String.ToUpper()</code> and <code>String.ToLower()</code> methods, you can use <code>Radioboxes</code> for the selection, 
and read your class book before bringing homework here.

EliottA wrote:

Don't want you guys thinking I posted random garble

Luc Pattyn wrote:

Just making up random questions now?

Samir Ibrahim wrote:

'Me.Version = "1.0" ' Warning 3 Property 'Version' doesn't return a value on all code paths.

Samir Ibrahim wrote:

1- Why it gives warning in 'Me.Version = "1.0"

Public Class MyControl
    Private Const m_Version As String = "1.0"
    Public ReadOnly Property Version() As String
        Get
            Return m_Version
        End Get
    End Property
End Class

Dave Kreskowiak wrote:

pick up a beginners book on VB.NET

Samir Ibrahim wrote:

You know something?

It became hard for someone to ask simple question and he got an answer without the person who answer the question show his arrogance and he know to much and he reads a lot of books and all should do as he did.

well, I have something to say to you, I am not a beginner, I know classing and subclassing more than you can imagine. 6 month of learning vb.net and i finished my first sql server vb.net application and my company work on it now.

Search for "imdb dll" or "imdb.dll" in google, it is a dll based on class i create it.

I was in top contributor in many vfp forums, and i am giving help in vb.net forums as well.

It seem the person should be as***le and super arrogance in order to get some respect.

Samir Ibrahim wrote:

-if Return Version is wrong then this is bu***hit design

Samir Ibrahim wrote:

-If Every Property should be replaced by a variable, that is bu***hit design

Samir Ibrahim wrote:

-If creating a UserControl and put some coding in it, and then drag this Usercontrol to a form and the code written in the UserControl design being executed in the form, well if that is not subclassing I wonder what it is.

Samir Ibrahim wrote:

I will follow your advice and get a beginner vb.net book plus a milk biberon

I had enough of asking help in here.

Dave Kreskowiak wrote:

I'm not out here try to grab respect

Dave Kreskowiak wrote:

I pointed out that you don't have a basic understanding of how Properties work

Dave Kreskowiak wrote:

Samir Ibrahim wrote:
-if Return Version is wrong then this is bu***hit design

Excuse me, but you wrote that code

Dave Kreskowiak wrote:

I said the problem you have in your code HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH SUBCLASSING.

Dave Kreskowiak wrote:

Excuse me, but where was I "super arrogant"??

Samir Ibrahim wrote:

It's hard to threw 15 years of "any Language" experience behind your back and start learning new language from scratch

williamnw wrote:

you are asking why writing a function (forget that it's a property for the moment) without returning a value causes a compiler warning that there is no value returned?

Public Class myclass1
    Function Sum()
        Sum = 1 + 2     ' <-- Works Fine
        Me.Sum = 1 + 2  ' <-- Gives error although me.Sum should be the same as Sum alone
    End Function
End Class

Samir Ibrahim wrote:

Sum = 1 + 2 ' <-- Works Fine

Samir Ibrahim wrote:

Me.Sum = 1 + 2 ' <-- Gives error although me.Sum should be the same as Sum alone

Public Class myclass1
    ' It's "best practice" to explicitly declare visibility of the Function and to
    ' define it's return type if you're not using LINQ, or some other technology
    ' that will try to imply the return type for you based on possible values that
    ' the code might return.
    Public Function Sum() As Integer
        ' You haven't defined Sum anywhere, except as a function name.  VB6 supported just
        ' treating the function name as the return value holder.  You should NOT be using
        ' practice in VB.NET.  It is only there for backward compatibility with converted
        ' VB6 code.
        Sum = 1 + 2  ' <-- Works Fine
 
        ' Now you're treating Sum not as a variable, as in the previous line, but as an object
        ' or property.  This will not work since Sum, outside of it's own code, cannot be
        ' as a variable since, in true OOP, it's a method name.
        Me.Sum = 1 + 2  ' <-- Gives error although me.Sum should be the same as Sum alone

        ' It is considered "best practice" to explicitly declare a single Return statement.
        Return x
     End Function
End Class