|
 I think so
Life goes very fast. Tomorrow, today is already yesterday.
|
|
|
|
|
your not by any chance trying to work with automation of some type are you? I remember doing Word automation where they want object as params in functions and you have to set them as object instances outside of the function as they need referencing.
Life goes very fast. Tomorrow, today is already yesterday.
|
|
|
|
|
Variant, I know he wants a variant, I can't beleive linq has brought back the variant (var) 
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
It hasn't. Although that's what I first thought when I came across var. 
When you do var x = from..., x is strongly typed (you may not know what its type is, but, whatever it is, you can't assign something of a different type to it unlike variants.)
Regards
David R
---------------------------------------------------------------
"Every program eventually becomes rococo, and then rubble." - Alan Perlis
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
anybody had idea how to work with multiple stored procedures of data set (xsd) file in crystal report.
Thanks,
kanwal
|
|
|
|
|
Hi everybody, I have a strange problem in a simple following C# code:
float x = 15.15F;
float y = 9F;
float ans = x-y;
the answer should be: 6.15F
the answer I get: 6.14999962
when I use debug mode, x = 15.15 like it should be, and y=9, only after the substraction it happens, and I don't want to use Math.Round and all the workarounds, it's simple substraction, it should give simple answer, if someone have any idea about a possible reason I would be thankful.
Thank you all.
|
|
|
|
|
floaters can be annoying like that... I mean floats!
check out the documentation on them in MSDN i'm sure you will get your answer. Comes to mind thou that I seem to remember reading the Decimal is much more reliable. Is that an option for you? Of course you will have to look at the information on that too to check I am not imaging reading that (it happens sometimes - you can ask the flying pig outside my window if you don't believe me  )
Life goes very fast. Tomorrow, today is already yesterday.
|
|
|
|
|
oink snort Decimal exists squeal hurumph.
Microsoft says:
The Decimal value type represents decimal numbers ranging from positive 79,228,162,514,264,337,593,543,950,335 to negative 79,228,162,514,264,337,593,543,950,335. The Decimal value type is appropriate for financial calculations requiring large numbers of significant integral and fractional digits and no round-off errors.
Panic, Chaos, Destruction.
My work here is done.
|
|
|
|
|
..damn... those voices are back again 
Good MS quote, I like that info thou I am wondering... How could one say a number of such size? without saying seventy-nine billion billion billion... (assuming my kind of billion which is a thousand million - 1 and 9 zero's)
Life goes very fast. Tomorrow, today is already yesterday.
|
|
|
|
|
Names for Large Numbers[^]
No trees were harmed in the sending of this message; however, a significant number of electrons were slightly inconvenienced.
This message is made of fully recyclable Zeros and Ones
|
|
|
|
|
nice thou in the UK (Europe) our billion is power 9. and I though the US was power 12.
who the jizz though of sexvigintillion
Life goes very fast. Tomorrow, today is already yesterday.
|
|
|
|
|
Nah, UK billion is million * million (E12), US is thousand * million (E9) just to be annoying...
No trees were harmed in the sending of this message; however, a significant number of electrons were slightly inconvenienced.
This message is made of fully recyclable Zeros and Ones
|
|
|
|
|
Strange, 25 years and I always used E9 for billion... Oh well, my bad 
Life goes very fast. Tomorrow, today is already yesterday.
|
|
|
|
|
Works fine with decimal, thank you for the tip.
But it's very interesting why it's doesn't work with double and float, I don't understand why there's a difference.
C.R.E.A.M
|
|
|
|
|
I can't recall of top of head (and don't want to search either) but think is something to do with how it is stored in memory. But like I say sometimes things put themselves in my head, thou generally the truth is in there somewhere too 
Life goes very fast. Tomorrow, today is already yesterday.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now that's a good link 
I'll read that in a bit, thanks.
Life goes very fast. Tomorrow, today is already yesterday.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
i was wondering has any one created a office style combobox. That will work on its own.
Roy
|
|
|
|
|
precious roy wrote: i was wondering has any one created a office style combobox
yeah... I seem to remember someone has... Oh Yeah! it was Microsoft 
I have no idea what you are talking about, can you provide link to a picture of what you mean, or a better description of where it can be seen in office, or maybe you could draw one using only ASCII characters 33 - 126 (inclusive)... now there's a challenge
Life goes very fast. Tomorrow, today is already yesterday.
|
|
|
|
|
,-------------------.
| |\/||
'-------------------'
... Damn, it's harder than it looks... Maybe if I create my own font I could do it with one character, what you think?
Life goes very fast. Tomorrow, today is already yesterday.
|
|
|
|
|
Looks good but does it work in visual studio :}
no what i mean is... is there a cool looking combobox that is not the standard one from Microsoft. because it looks awful in xp classic style.
Roy
|
|
|
|
|
There is nothing built in. I assume that is why WPF[^] was created, to allow more flexible styles.
You could try either creating your own control or handling the drawing for the one that is already available. I'm sure there will be tutorials around for either of those two options.
Life goes very fast. Tomorrow, today is already yesterday.
|
|
|
|
|
hello
Process.Start("shutdown", "-s");
i use this code to turn off system but when this code executed one form same as main form is open.
please tell me where is problem?
shahin gholami
|
|
|
|
|
if I understood your problem then maybe I could tell you how to solve it
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
