|
Assuming 0 = no colour, 1 = lots of it, and 0=see through, and 1=opaque...
I'd say something like this:
newRed = ( baseAlpha * baseRed + paintAlpha * paintRed ) / (baseAlpha + paintAlpha);
newGreen = ...
newBlue = ...
newAlpha = 1 - (1-baseAlpha)*(1-paintAlpha);
I didn't add in a check whether both paintAlpha and baseAlpha were 0. In which case, newAlpha is also 0, and the end colour is "undefined". Or irrelevant!
I'll leave the challenge of converting my 0.0-1.0 sums to 0-255 to you!
Iain.
In the process of moving to Sweden for love (awwww).
If you're in Scandinavia and want an MVP on the payroll (or happy with a remote worker), give me a job!
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think that method is completly correct.. Calculation of new alpha seems to be right, but not the colors.
If you have a pixel with RGBA value (1, 0, 0, 1) = Red pixel 100% opaque
Then you paint it over with RBGA value (0, 1, 0, 1) = Green pixel 100% opaque
You should end up with a (0, 1, 0, 1) pixel, but you get (0.5, 0.5, 0, 1) = Semi Red/Green 100% opaque
Also tried following base color (1, 0, 0, 0.5) = Red pixel 50% opaque
Painted over with color (0, 1, 0, 0.5) = Green pixel 50% opaque
You should en up with a (0.33, 0.67, 0, 0.75) pixel, but you get (0.5, 0.5, 0, 0.75)
My reference points are from how Paint.NET and Photoshop handle pixels with alpha.
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, but he asked how to MIX the colours, not how to put one on top of the other...
If it's layering, then...
afterRed = topAlpha * topRed + (1-topAlpha) * bottomRed;
I'm not sure I agree with your 0.33 math though - but if so, I'm still wrong! The 0.75 alpha applied to my 0.5 in the above equation gives you 0.375 end colour.
(I also agree that the on-top rather than chucked-in-a-bowl-and-stirred interpretation is more likely to be correct)
Iain.
In the process of moving to Sweden for love (awwww).
If you're in Scandinavia and want an MVP on the payroll (or happy with a remote worker), give me a job!
|
|
|
|
|
Hi.
Yes this works if the bottom color has an alpha of 1.0
I guess it will work for me, since my bottom layer always have full alpha.
But still I can't figure out how it works when having opacity set on the bottom layer.
I've looked in the Paint.NET source, and I can't find anything that explains how they calculate the colors when both pixels have opacity set. Only found functions that works same as you described.
BTW, thank you for your help!
If you want to take a look at the source it is available here: http://www.afterdawn.com/software/source_codes/paint.net.cfm
In UnaryPixelOps.cs
public override ColorBgra Apply(ColorBgra color)
{
int a = blendColor.A;
int invA = 255 - a;
int r = ((color.R * invA) + (blendColor.R * a)) / 256;
int g = ((color.G * invA) + (blendColor.G * a)) / 256;
int b = ((color.B * invA) + (blendColor.B * a)) / 256;
byte a2 = ComputeAlpha(color.A, blendColor.A);
return ColorBgra.FromBgra((byte)b, (byte)g, (byte)r, a2);
}
In ColorBgra.cs
public static ColorBgra Blend(ColorBgra ca, ColorBgra cb, byte cbAlpha)
{
uint caA = (uint)Utility.FastScaleByteByByte((byte)(255 - cbAlpha), ca.A);
uint cbA = (uint)Utility.FastScaleByteByByte(cbAlpha, cb.A);
uint cbAT = caA + cbA;
uint r;
uint g;
uint b;
if (cbAT == 0)
{
r = 0;
g = 0;
b = 0;
}
else
{
r = ((ca.R * caA) + (cb.R * cbA)) / cbAT;
g = ((ca.G * caA) + (cb.G * cbA)) / cbAT;
b = ((ca.B * caA) + (cb.B * cbA)) / cbAT;
}
return ColorBgra.FromBgra((byte)b, (byte)g, (byte)r, (byte)cbAT);
}
public static int FastScaleByteByByte(byte a, byte b)
{
int r1 = a * b + 0x80;
int r2 = ((r1 >> 8) + r1) >> 8;
return (byte)r2;
}
Can't figure out what function 'FastScaleByteByByte' does and why the 3rd parameter 'cbAlpha' is required..
|
|
|
|
|
The "code" I gave you was very deliberately using 0-1 as my scale, rather than 0-255 which you actually need.
The FastScaleByteByByte function is actually:
public static int FastScaleByteByByte(byte a, byte b)
{
int r1 = a * b + 0x80;
int r2 = ((r1 >> 8) + r1) >> 8;
return (byte)r2;
}
The right shift is a very quick way of dividing by a power of 2.
So, it could be written:
public static int FastScaleByteByByte(byte a, byte b)
{
int r1 = a * b + 128;
int r2 = ((r1 / 256) + r1) / 256;
return (byte)r2;
}
They use this as a speedy way of calculating the equivalent of my alpha * XXX and (1-alpha) * YYY - but on a 255 base.
They are being sliiiightly naughty. They are dividing by 256 instead of 255. I'll forgive them a 0.4% error if this speed is increased greatly.
I'm glad to hear that great minds agree with me, and that I've been of assistance,
Iain.
In the process of moving to Sweden for love (awwww).
If you're in Scandinavia and want an MVP on the payroll (or happy with a remote worker), give me a job!
|
|
|
|
|
Also, isn't the source to Paint.NET available? You can peek at their math... and then prove me correct, obviously!
Iain.
In the process of moving to Sweden for love (awwww).
If you're in Scandinavia and want an MVP on the payroll (or happy with a remote worker), give me a job!
|
|
|
|
|
Iain Clarke wrote: You can peek at their math... and then prove me correct, obviously!
You are correct by definition (you are the "bestest ever expert", after all). He should peek at their math just if he needs to prove they're correct.
BTW-OT: Still in England?
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Can anyone tell me how to convert a LZW compression type tiff file to PDF?
Please do help me out.
Thnx in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
There are two steps to go about it:
1. Uncompress the archive using the same library that you used to compress.
2. Given the extracted file is a tiff image, you can use a virtual pdf printer to print to PDF. Or if you are wanting to do this from your program, use a pdf library like Haru[^]
It is a crappy thing, but it's life -^ Carlo Pallini
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi....
Thnx for the reply....
I downloaded the code and executed it on the tiff files that i have.
The code seems to execute perfectly for the tiff files that are of 'CCIT Group 4 FAX' and 'CCIT Group 3 FAX '.But for the files having compression type as 'LZW', i get a blank PDF file as output.
Please do let me know is there a way of converting the LZW type tiff files.
Thank You.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't get it. Are the tiff files compressed to an archive using LZW or the tiff compression itself uses the LZW algorithm to reduce size?
It is a crappy thing, but it's life -^ Carlo Pallini
|
|
|
|
|
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote: the tiff compression itself uses the LZW algorithm
That one. TIFF files can use many different compression formats. I remember, many, many, many years ago, writing an encoder or decoder (can't remember which) for TIFF files with CCITT group 3 compression on an IBM mainframe using PL/I. That was an experience...
Java, Basic, who cares - it's all a bunch of tree-hugging hippy cr*p
|
|
|
|
|
Hi....
Actually here i have been given a set of tiff files.Now when you go and look into each tiff file's page properties (View Menu -> Page properties), you will be able to see its compression type.My task requires the tiff files with 'LZW' type compression to be converted to PDF.Wheni execute the code that you had suggested in your previous link, i get a blank PDF file.It seems to work for the other tiff files with different compression type but for the LZW compression type it doesn't seem to work. I have no idea what to do.
Please do let me know if you have any solution.Thanks alot.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
i m working on Visual Studio 2008.
i m working on Windows based mobiloe,on XP active sync ia works so i m using RAPI for connection and other functionns,but this is not working in case of Mobile device center.
because for Vista and later mobile device center in required.
so please tell me what can i use for mobile device center.
if possible please explain me with example.
thanks in advance.
To accomplish great things, we must not only act, but also dream;
not only plan, but also believe.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All
How can i convert double to CString in vc++?Plz help me
|
|
|
|
|
double d = 12.3;<br />
CString cs;<br />
cs.Format("%f", d);<br />
«_Superman_»
I love work. It gives me something to do between weekends.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I have a third party dll which I registered with /i option.
Like regsvr32 /i:"someGUID" "DllPath" .registration succeeded.
I could notice that With /i option DllInstall function is also called with DllRegisterServer.
Now for me to use this dll I should call a function of it with the "someGUID" which it compares and returns successfully.
1)I would like to know what it does internally? Where does it store the GUID for comparing?
The dll has some function which takes strings(file paths) as input.
and displays as a list when we call another function of it.
Now I close my application and register the same third party dll with another GUID to use it in another application.I have repeated the above process.
When I got the list of all strings that it has it also shows the strings which it stored from the first application.I tried to find them in registry and also for any text files in the directory where the dll resides but of know use.
2)I would like to know where else can we save strings in windows other than files and registries.
Thanks
Satya
Today is a gift, that's why it is called the present.
|
|
|
|
|
narayanagvs wrote:
1)I would like to know what it does internally? Where does it store the GUID for comparing?
The source code to regsvr32 is here:
INFO: How Regsvr32.exe Registers and Unregisters COM DLLs[^]
Ultimately the COM interface information is stored in the registry database:
HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID
HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\AppID
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Classes\CLSID
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Classes\CLSID
narayanagvs wrote:
2)I would like to know where else can we save strings in windows other than files and registries.
I dont understand the question, the registry is also a file. Are you asking where to save information other than a hard drive.
Best Wishes,
-David Delaune
|
|
|
|
|
Hello
I have a menu class derived from CMenu whose purpose is to change the menu of the FrameWindow according to the childwindow which is done fine. But through the CMenu class can I add Alt key buttons or accelerators.
Prithaa
|
|
|
|
|
Erm... Doesn't MFC do what you're asking for automatically?
In an MDI program, you'll see a pMainFrame->LoadFrame (IDR...) line, which tells MFC which menu to use when you have no document loaded (and hence no childframe).
Next, you'll have a template being loaded, and the first parameter of the new template is a resource ID, which points to (among other things) a menu ID to use when that template is in action.
If that's all your custom menu class does, I think you can get rid of it...
As for alt keys, that's only partly the job of the menu. If you use the & key in front of a menu title (eg, &File), then that key will be highlit, and pressing Alt-F will bring up the file menu. Then you can do the same for menu items (ie, &Open), and then you can use Alt-F followed by O to use the file open menu...
For hot keys, (ie, Alt-f3 being file open), you need to set the accelerator table.
For more complex things, like adding accelerator values automatically to the menu, and toobar buttons also, have a look at the following article. It may be over the top, but it's very good!
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/menus/newmenuxpstyle.aspx
Owner Drawn Menu with Icons, Titles and Shading[^]
Good luck,
Iain.
In the process of moving to Sweden for love (awwww).
If you're in Scandinavia and want an MVP on the payroll (or happy with a remote worker), give me a job!
|
|
|
|
|
I have problem in style or appearance of the Menu bar and document in document view architecture.
In my application the document is dipped inside compare to menu bar (example if you open a notepad u can identify the menu bar is some what high and document is slightly dipped inside)
But I need the appearance the document should be high compare to menu bar (Example if open windows calculator u can see the document is high compare to menu bar)
Please give me suggestion to do this and is this possible to do in SDI or MDI architecture?
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know if I fully understand you, but you could try to remove the client edge style in the view class.
ModifyStyleEx(WS_EX_CLIENTEDGE, 0);
«_Superman_»
I love work. It gives me something to do between weekends.
|
|
|
|
|
I had tried already , I removed client edge in style itself, even if we put thick frame style we are not getting the result
|
|
|
|
|
I actually tried it in OnInitialUpdate function of the View class and it worked.
«_Superman_»
I love work. It gives me something to do between weekends.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
