Macro to collapse .NET Solution Explorer Tree. - C# Discussion Boards

13-Sep-02 12:52

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;Q305814&[^]

Smile | :)

David Stone13-Sep-02 14:30

David Stone

13-Sep-02 14:30

Yeah but that shows how to use it from C#. Not how to implement it in C#. Frown | :(

David Stone

But Clinton wasn't a predictable, boring, aging, lying, eloquent, maintainer-of-the-status-quo. He was a predictable, boring-but-trying-to-look-hip, aging-and-fat-but-seemingly-oblivious-to-it, lying-but-in-sadly-blatant-ways, not-eloquent-but-trying-to-make-up-for-it-by-talking-even-more, bringer-in-of-scary-and-potentially-dangerous-new-policies. And there was also Al Gore. It just wasn't *right*.

Shog⁹

Nnamdi Onyeyiri13-Sep-02 23:46

Nnamdi Onyeyiri

13-Sep-02 23:46

thats because you cant. says so in the first paragraph. Poke tongue | ;-P

Suspicious | :suss: Email: theeclypse@hotmail.com URL: http://www.onyeyiri.co.uk
"All programmers are playwrights and all computers are lousy actors."

bfarley15-Sep-02 1:05

bfarley

15-Sep-02 1:05

Not quite true. C# supports the params keyword, which allows an object[] of user-defined size to be passed as a method parameter. This could be used to implement optional args in a sense.

Bill F

Nnamdi Onyeyiri15-Sep-02 1:38

Nnamdi Onyeyiri

15-Sep-02 1:38

i suppose, but not in the same manner as in c++ which i think is better.

Suspicious | :suss: Email: theeclypse@hotmail.com URL: http://www.onyeyiri.co.uk
"All programmers are playwrights and all computers are lousy actors."

James T. Johnson15-Sep-02 1:48

James T. Johnson

15-Sep-02 1:48

bfarley wrote:
in a sense

Those are the key words right there.... Instead of writing a normal method and specifying default values you have to go through the array and find out which parameters go where, and lord help you if you have two parameters of the same type but only one is in the array WTF | :WTF:

There are times where I like not having optional parameters because it makes the user of that code think before just accepting the defaults; other times its a real PITA.

James
"And we are all men; apart from the females." - Colin Davies

Macro to collapse .NET Solution Explorer Tree.

bfarley15-Sep-02 6:22

bfarley

15-Sep-02 6:22

Hey, I didn't say it was perfect - just that it could be done.

Bill F

Derek Smigelski13-Sep-02 3:34

Derek Smigelski

13-Sep-02 3:34

I Need a macro to collapse .NET Solution Explorer Tree. Does any one know how to do that, or have code that will do that?

Thanks,
Derek

Re: Macro to collapse .NET Solution Explorer Tree.

Not Active13-Sep-02 5:50

Not Active

13-Sep-02 5:50

Just in how many places are you going to ask this?

Re: Macro to collapse .NET Solution Explorer Tree.

leppie13-Sep-02 7:07

release a dll at runtime.

13-Sep-02 7:07

fftongzhi12-Sep-02 23:30

fftongzhi

12-Sep-02 23:30

It is hard to release a dll at runtime.
Any body know the solution?
my question at:
http://www.codeproject.com/script/comments/forums.asp?msg=281721&forumid=1649#xx281721xx

lost my way

Eric Gunnerson (msft)13-Sep-02 11:43

Eric Gunnerson (msft)

13-Sep-02 11:43

You can't release an individual dll, you can only release a whole appdomain.

See http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dncscol/html/csharp05162002.asp

for more information

fftongzhi15-Sep-02 18:16

fftongzhi

15-Sep-02 18:16

thanks.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dncscol/html/csharp05162002.asp
and
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dncscol/html/csharp03122002.asp
helped me.
Reflection is a very powerful namespace,but hard to use. Blush | :O

lost my way

leppie15-Sep-02 21:10

15-Sep-02 21:10

GREAT! So when can we expect an article? Smile | :)

I would love to see some more examples.

fftongzhi15-Sep-02 22:34

fftongzhi

15-Sep-02 22:34

just see the two articles by Eric,and it is clear enough. Smile | :)

lost my way

i want to execute that line

stephen woolhead13-Sep-02 12:12

stephen woolhead

13-Sep-02 12:12

There is an article

http://www.codeproject.com/csharp/livecodedotnet.asp

that talks about loading and unloading plugins at runtime. Might be of some help.

Stephen

imran_rafique12-Sep-02 22:26

imran_rafique

12-Sep-02 22:26

i want to execute that line

SetWindowsHookEx(WH_JOURNALRECORD, JournalRecorderFunc,AfxGetInstanceHandle(), 0);

in csharp.
I know that SetWindowsHookEx is defiend in "user32".but the problem herer is that
I don't know where AfxGetInstanceHandle() is defiend so that i can use ijw or
pinvoke to solve my problem.

if i use it in csharp may i have to Initialized the MFC or not if yes please tell
how will i Initialized it.
how will i Initialized MFC IN MANAGED CODE?

how to use mfc dll in c# and how to access class and function in it?
related link if u could provide?

r00d0034@yahoo.com

Re: i want to execute that line

Rickard Andersson²⁰13-Sep-02 2:55

Rickard Andersson²⁰

13-Sep-02 2:55

imran_rafique wrote:
how will i Initialized MFC IN MANAGED CODE?

Cry | :((

No no no no no!!

Don't even think about it!

imran_rafique wrote:
I don't know where AfxGetInstanceHandle()

Marshal.GetHINSTANCE(...)
But I don't know how to use it! Poke tongue | ;-P

Rickard Andersson@Suza Computing
C# and C++ programmer from SWEDEN!
UIN: 50302279
E-Mail: nikado@pc.nu
Speciality: I love C#, ASP.NET and C++!

VS .NET on Win2000

shaggi12-Sep-02 22:07

shaggi

12-Sep-02 22:07

I would like ot install on my computer (128RAM, 450MHz) Windows 2000, because I hope I'll get a better performance with VS .NET, than I get under WIndowsXP. (I do not plan an upgrade until January '03)
Do I make a right guess??

Here my prob is how to install Windows 2000 without do destroy WinXP? Any ideas are appreciated!

Thank you!

Paul Riley13-Sep-02 0:18

Paul Riley

13-Sep-02 0:18

Shaggi wrote:
I would like ot install on my computer (128RAM, 450MHz) Windows 2000, because I hope I'll get a better performance with VS .NET, than I get under WIndowsXP. (I do not plan an upgrade until January '03)
Do I make a right guess??

Yes, because Windows XP will eat a larger part of that 128Mb RAM than Win2K will, but I'm not sure you'll get quite the benefit you're hoping for.

Shaggi wrote:
Here my prob is how to install Windows 2000 without do destroy WinXP? Any ideas are appreciated!

You need a completely spare partition, usually the primary partition of a secondary drive (not even sure if it's possible otherwise). Reboot from the CD and follow the instructions, being very careful not to format or install on the wrong drive. You should end up with a machine that asks you on startup which version of Windows you want to load.

Just as a bit of free advice - don't try to hook the software from XP into 2K, it's much safer to have two copies of everything.

Dual boot machines, as you may have guessed by now, can be very heavy on disk space; you might find it a lot cheaper just to buy a couple of 256Mb RAM chips. RAM is surprisingly cheap nowadays.

Paul

shaggi13-Sep-02 2:05

shaggi

13-Sep-02 2:05

thanks to you and leppie

I have too much free space on my HDD, so its going to be cheaper than another peace of RAM I also would like to be able to use Win2000 too, so installing Win2000 isn't that bad.

BTW. What about if I want to install win from HDD (I remember the first time when I did it from the CD, it took me about 2hrs Wink | ;)

Should this make a difference?

leppie13-Sep-02 3:51

13-Sep-02 3:51

Shaggi wrote:
What about if I want to install win from HDD (I remember the first time when I did it from the CD, it took me about 2hrs Should this make a difference?

I find that if u install from HDD, WIn2k copy the files to a temp location, however installing from a booted win2k cd wont copy the files, it will just read straight from the CD.

Smile | :)

Paul Riley13-Sep-02 4:21

Paul Riley

13-Sep-02 4:21

Shaggi wrote:
I have too much free space on my HDD, so its going to be cheaper than another peace of RAM I also would like to be able to use Win2000 too, so installing Win2000 isn't that bad.

That's fair enough. If you work it properly, you can do all sorts of cool things like being able to link your Outlook files to the same place, etc. Useful if you're going to be doing this long-term. I ran 2K/ME dual-boot for over a year.

Haven't found a reason yet to have XP and 2K dual boot but I'm running 738Mb of memory, so XP is fine. If I only had 128 I'd be doing the same thing you are Smile | :)

Shaggi wrote:
BTW. What about if I want to install win from HDD (I remember the first time when I did it from the CD, it took me about 2hrs Should this make a difference?

As leppie said, this isn't always a good idea and to be honest it probably wouldn't save you that much time unless you're running a slow CD ROM drive (8x or less).

Installing an OS is never a quick job.

One other piece of advice... make sure you have Win2K versions of all your hardware drivers before you start Smile | :)

Paul

shaggi13-Sep-02 9:20

shaggi

13-Sep-02 9:20

thank you people I'm about to start installing all the stuff... Wink | ;)

hm, perhaps I should go to the nearest church first Wink | ;)

good luck

leppie13-Sep-02 0:20