|
That is easy, just replace taskmgr.exe by something you develop yourself.
|
|
|
|
|
And then get hired by Microsoft. Head up one of the OS development teams. It shouldn't take too long.
|
|
|
|
|
No thanks. I would consider rewriting Task Manager if I really felt a need, which I don't, but it has to end there. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
For a C# (or .NET) application, this is not easy at all. The main issue is that the .NET framework did not provide the necessary API to acomplish this task, so you have to reside on Win32 API, or, even on kernel API.
|
|
|
|
|
Just saw ur question... Actually this is VERY possible. I made a code that hides the process from process tab. When u look at running process number, it stays the same, but the exe process isnt on list anymore. Quite hard to do, but possible
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
I have a control that builds up queries to be run against both Databases and the .NET DataTable, in this control the user can select individual parts of the query to be case-insensitive. To generate this query for the database is easy because I can just surround the field names and variable with UPPER() e.g.
SELECT * FROM ... WHERE UPPER(name) = UPPER('test') AND surname = 'test' AND town = 'test'
Now I know I can make an entire datatable case-insensitive but I don't want to do this, I want just individual parts of the WHERE clause to be - is there any way of doing this in my DataTable Select()?
Thanks in advance, Tom
|
|
|
|
|
Most databases I know of, are case-insensitive by default.
What is the problem?
xacc.ide - now with TabsToSpaces support IronScheme - 1.0 beta 1 - out now! ((lambda (x) `((lambda (x) ,x) ',x)) '`((lambda (x) ,x) ',x))
|
|
|
|
|
The .NET DataTable I'm querying on is case sensitive because I've set it to be, what I want a user to be able to do is to add a load of conditions and set just certain ones to be case-insensitive so they may wish to only find a record if the location field matches 'Home' in that case, but also to use the same query to match any records where for example the name field contains 'Test' in any case.
The issue is with .NET DataTables rather than databases because my DB is case-sensitive and to acheive the same result I just wrap UPPER() around the fields I want to make case-insensitive, I hope I've explained this a bit better?
|
|
|
|
|
ro88o wrote: hope I've explained this a bit better?
Yes
From what I can see, case-sensitivity can only be set on the DataTable as a whole, and not individual columns.
Perhaps, someone else knows of a way?
xacc.ide - now with TabsToSpaces support IronScheme - 1.0 beta 1 - out now! ((lambda (x) `((lambda (x) ,x) ',x)) '`((lambda (x) ,x) ',x))
|
|
|
|
|
hello i have made setup file for my window application i want to make installation og .net framework by same setup so i am not able to make it plz suggest something
Thanks & Regards,
Prashant B. Lavate
Software Engineer
Mobile : +919423872257
Pune(India)
|
|
|
|
|
Prashant B. Lavate wrote: so i am not able to make it
So what exactly is the problem?
xacc.ide - now with TabsToSpaces support IronScheme - 1.0 beta 1 - out now! ((lambda (x) `((lambda (x) ,x) ',x)) '`((lambda (x) ,x) ',x))
|
|
|
|
|
i have made setup file added dependencies but when i statrted installation for he shows messgae for frmawork when i click accept it installs it from net
Thanks & Regards,
Prashant B. Lavate
Software Engineer
Mobile : +919423872257
Pune(India)
|
|
|
|
|
You can download .NET framework redistributable and supply it along with your package. The install creator program which I used has an option to install framework before installing application.
|
|
|
|
|
yes but i am making setup file by .net only i.e. set up and deploy and deplymen project so from there how can i make it?
Thanks & Regards,
Prashant B. Lavate
Software Engineer
Mobile : +919423872257
Pune(India)
|
|
|
|
|
And which is that? That sounds like a dandy nice feature, I would definitely like that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
You want to ship .Net framework along with your setup project?
If that is the case, set it as a prerequisite in the properties of your setup project.
Loading signature. Please wait...
|
|
|
|
|
yes i setted that but it asks me url path for that but how can setup the same folder
Thanks & Regards,
Prashant B. Lavate
Software Engineer
Mobile : +919423872257
Pune(India)
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I'm using Stream.Read(byte[] buffer, int offset, int count). Is there an alternative to that method (or a property to set) so that the method won't return until all count is read (or end of stream is reached)? Or should I do something like this:
int n = 0, readCount = 0;
while ((n = myStream.Read(buffer, readCount, countToRead - readCount)) > 0)
readCount += n;
|
|
|
|
|
No, you can't force it to read the number of bytes that you request. You have to use a loop with the Read method if you want to read the entire stream.
You should check if the return value from the method is zero, not only if the total number of bytes has reached the expected. If the stream happens to be smaller than you expect, your code will go into an eternal loop.
Despite everything, the person most likely to be fooling you next is yourself.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I edited the post and checked the return value, probably at the same time you were writing. 
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi everybody,
my application (A) opens a port 35000. An external application (B) has the possibility to connect
on this port 35000.
If the application A is launched 3-times it opens the port 35000, for the second the port 35001 and so far...
Now i created a little tool to check which ports are open.
a simple loop which increments the Portnumber from 30000 to 30256.
But it takes 1 second for each port, so more than 256 seconds for all these possible ports...
In the loop i make each time a
new IPEndPoint(...
and
new Socket(....
Does it run faster in asynchronous mode?
Big thanks for help
|
|
|
|
|
baerten wrote: Does it run faster in asynchronous mode?
It should, just fire off each request in it's own thread.
xacc.ide - now with TabsToSpaces support IronScheme - 1.0 beta 1 - out now! ((lambda (x) `((lambda (x) ,x) ',x)) '`((lambda (x) ,x) ',x))
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for your reply.
But it should also work in a easier way or not?
All Port Scanner Tools works much faster.
I can only test a port each second, thats very slow 
So i open for each port a new thread which executes the work?
Thanks to you
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
