|
You can create user accounts on the machine or domain and then assign the security to the directories using standard windows security features. Basic authentication is not recommended for domain accounts as they are sent in plain text. BTW, I think this is a web dev question.
Need software developed? Offering C# development all over the United States, ERL GLOBAL, Inc is the only call you will have to make.
Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know. -- Ernest Hemingway
Most of this sig is for Google, not ego.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Ennis,
1.
I understand how to create user account for local machine, but how to create user account for a domain? Any guides or documents?
2.
"assign the security to the directories using standard windows security features" -- not sure which management function do you mean, confused -- both Windows Server and IIS has a couple of various account management dialogs. Could you post some links or documents about what do you mean "assign the security to the directories using standard windows security features" please?
regards,
George
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi leppie,
The GUI of this site looks fancy, but a little messy information on this site. This site is specialized for what topics?
regards,
George
|
|
|
|
|
Title says it all really, is it possible to call a .NET 2 library from a .NET 1.1 library?
The obvious and immediate answer is no, as the 1.1 library will be running in a 1.1 AppDomain that does not include the 2.0 framework. However is there anyway to "bridge" across, maybe remoting/custom socket server?
modified on Thursday, September 25, 2008 8:47 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Haven't tested Remoting (although I think it is possible) but low level socket communication is definitely functioning.
Robert
|
|
|
|
|
I mean, why not.
Need software developed? Offering C# development all over the United States, ERL GLOBAL, Inc is the only call you will have to make.
Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know. -- Ernest Hemingway
Most of this sig is for Google, not ego.
|
|
|
|
|
I like the cut of your jib, however....
When I find a hack frig solution this will be deployed out to over 10 thousand servers and unfortunately the current build of these does not have MSMQ installed. Installing this as part of the deployment process is not feasible.
|
|
|
|
|
I am writing one simple C# application; which is used to read contents of web page.
While reading from the URL which first requires to log in.
Is there anyway that i can set user and password, and can read data from this page.
Thanks,
Perry
|
|
|
|
|
Which class are you using to read webpages? If it is HttpWebRequest, then have a look at Credentials property.
|
|
|
|
|
I tried setting Credentials with my user and password  .. still it reads login page ...
|
|
|
|
|
I am not sure but try setting PreAuthenticate property to true.
|
|
|
|
|
No success with this too ...
|
|
|
|
|
is there any way to Read/Write to a Column Description in a MSAccess Table?
example
Im writing an application for an industrial control that i have created a plugin for.
I want to be able to read from the comment for a column to use the information for setting certain events.
I am able to read/write to rows, columns,etc but unable to read the description and it would help me greatly.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
I am developing a couple of web services for work. Most of the methods return custom classes but I want one of them to just return a 'string' (either "OK" or "NOTOK").
The problem is that, whilst with custom classes the webservice's XML's tags are named according to the variable name (for example: <hotelsummary><hotelid>5 ... where HotelSummary is a type but HotelID is the variable name), with strings the XML returned is <string>OK.
Is it possible to rename the tags to display, for example, <hotelcheck>OK instead of the datatype?
Thanks a lot.
In life truth does not matter. What really matters is what others believe to be the truth. (The Up and Comer - Book)
|
|
|
|
|
il_manti wrote: but I want one of them to just return a 'string' (either "OK" or "NOTOK").
Why not use bool then? Return True/false
il_manti wrote: Is it possible to rename the tags to display, for example, OK instead of the datatype?
I don't think you can rename it. I am not sure though.
|
|
|
|
|
First, unless you are planning on expanding your status messages later, I would suggest using a boolean.
Second, sounds like you might be able to use an enumeration for this:
public enum Status
{
OK,
NOTOK
}
Then you would be able to say Status.OK or Status.NOTOK
Hope this helps,
Chris
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Chris,
Yes thanks a lot. The enum was exactly what we needed, especially since we are able to expand the responses whenever needed now.
In life truth does not matter. What really matters is what others believe to be the truth. (The Up and Comer - Book)
|
|
|
|
|
Glad to have helped! 
|
|
|
|
|
how can i use txtNoPersoneli when this is in other form?
|
|
|
|
|
If txtNoPersoneli's access modifier is public then you should be able to access it through otherforminstance.txtNoPersoneli
Better still, create events in otherform that are rasied when whatever your interested in with txtNoPersoneli occurs, and subscribe to these in the initial form.
DaveBTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)Expect everything to be hard and then enjoy the things that come easy. (code-frog)
|
|
|
|
|
i change to public,but yet i can not use that
|
|
|
|
|
You have to access it through an instance of the second form. For example, if the form is called Form2 then:
Form2 form2 = new Form2();
form2.txtNoPersoneli.Text = "Text";
DaveBTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)Visual Basic is not used by normal people so we're not covering it here. (Uncyclopedia)
|
|
|
|
|
Whoever univoted this - I agree that it's not best practice and if you look at my previous reply I did suggest using events (implies delegates too). The question in response to that from the OP was specifically on the unrecommended way, to which I gave an accurate and working response!  
DaveBTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)Visual Basic is not used by normal people so we're not covering it here. (Uncyclopedia)
|
|
|
|
|
You change the access modifier to public, but it is not recommended as it breaks OO rules. Use delegates to communicate between forms. CP has an article on this subject.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
