|
Make sure you can see the "Workspace View" inside the VC++ IDE. You can do this by clicking the "View" menu, then choosing "Workspace". There will be three tabs, click on the "ClassView" tab. You should see "Simple_ATL Classes". Right click on this and choose "New ATL Object" from the popup menu. You will see a window with various options.
The ATL Object Wizard
The default choice (Simple Object) is what we want. Click the next button and you will be in the "ATL Object Wizard Properties" window. In the "Short Name" textbox, enter "IPreferThis".
Hope this is relevant to your query...
Somethings seem HARD to do, until we know how to do them.
 _AnShUmAn_
|
|
|
|
|
Hi AnShUmAn,
I always use the wizard before. But it is used for creating a new com component and its exposed interface.
My purpose is, I already have a com component and I want to make the component implements from one more interface. Then how to easily add the code to make the com component implement one more interface in ATL framework. 
Any ideas?
regards,
George
|
|
|
|
|
I have developed a software used in engineering calculation fields.In my software,
every funtion is activated by clicking a menu item.Now I have a problem that I don't know how to Execute several tasks simultaneity by clicking differet menu items continuously.
IF you can help me solve this question please message me or post your solution to my
e-mail:toschl@yeah.net.
Thanks for your help sincerely.
|
|
|
|
|
Dont need to show your mail(do you like spam!? )
Do you want to run some actions at same time?
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think you can use of multithreading if you like to use it see these exmpales:
here[^] and here[^].
|
|
|
|
|
you should be reading Multithreading[^]then
Somethings seem HARD to do, until we know how to do them.
 _AnShUmAn_
|
|
|
|
|
While you could certainly put each task in its own thread, those threads will only run in parallel if you have more than one processor.
"Love people and use things, not love things and use people." - Unknown
"The brick walls are there for a reason...to stop the people who don't want it badly enough." - Randy Pausch
|
|
|
|
|
Hi to all,
any testing tool is available for testing MFC(VC++) application
varun
|
|
|
|
|
Does your program has any bug or leak memory or etc?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi friends,
Since you know, when "Windows + F1" is pressed, Windows-Help dialog will be shown.
I would like to disable this HotKey in my application.
By the way, when "Windows + F1" is pressed, no messages will be sent to my application.
Truely yours.
|
|
|
|
|
You must be override OnHelpInfo(ON_WM_HELPINFO).
modified on Tuesday, September 16, 2008 2:46 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for your answer, but I did it and nothing happened.
Apparently, this is not a correct answer.
|
|
|
|
|
Why it doesnt work for you while it works ?
ON_COMMAND(ID_HELP, &CWinApp::OnHelp)
void CWinApp::OnHelp()
{
MessageBox(GetFocus(),_T("1"),_T("1"),MB_OK);
}
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, but it really doesn't work.
I have overwritten OnHelpInfo but when "Windows + F1" is pressed, Windows-Help
dialog will be shown.("Windows + F1" is registered as a HOTKEY by Windows)
When I press "Windows+F1", the nothing happen(according to the following code):
/************************************************************************/
BEGIN_MESSAGE_MAP(CECDlg, CDialog)
ON_WM_HELPINFO()
ON_COMMAND(ID_HELP, OnHelp)
END_MESSAGE_MAP()
BOOL CECDlg::OnHelpInfo(HELPINFO* pHelpInfo)
{
// TODO: Add your message handler code here and/or call default
// Overwrite this method to disable Help Info in my application.
//return CDialog::OnHelpInfo(pHelpInfo);
Beep(1000, 1000);
return FALSE;
}
void CECDlg::OnHelp()
{
Beep(1000, 1000);
}
/************************************************************************/
|
|
|
|
|
Hamid. wrote: why 1!!!
because <big>Win</big>+F1 is different from just F1 !
|
|
|
|
|
Oh I saw only F1 not Win+F1 at that question. 
|
|
|
|
|
Mohammad Khodaea wrote: By the way, when "Windows + F1" is pressed, no messages will be sent to my application.
No surprise there (since it's a special key). You might create a global message hook to see what messages are generated when the Windows key is pressed.
"Love people and use things, not love things and use people." - Unknown
"The brick walls are there for a reason...to stop the people who don't want it badly enough." - Randy Pausch
|
|
|
|
|
I develop a software with VC++ 6.0.Now I wanna display several windows in the main view. And every window completes one specific task.For example, you can input some parameters in one window and get results data in another window.
If anyone has good solution you can message me or post your solution to my E-MAIL:toschl@yeah.net
Thank for your heip sincerely
Thank you
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think a single document, multiple view approach might be better. If one view is changed a single call to UpdateAllViews will cause them all to be updated.
|
|
|
|
|
Does this concept of an interactive system service still exist on Vista?
From what I am reading, the interactive service seems no longer viable here.
If one wants to write a system service which interacts with the user...
Is the only way just to write 2 apps (service+ui-app) that can talk to each other?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<br />
Peter Weyzen<br />
Staff Engineer<br />
<a href="http://www.soonr.com">SoonR Inc -- PC Power delivered to your phone</a>
|
|
|
|
|
Peter Weyzen wrote: Does this concept of an interactive system service still exist on Vista?
"Important Services cannot directly interact with
a user as of Windows Vista. Therefore, the techniques
mentioned in the section titled Using an Interactive
Service should not be used in new code." (Source[^])
I read that as it's a bad idea 
Peter Weyzen wrote: s the only way just to write 2 apps (service+ui-app) that can talk to each other?
If the service doesn't need to be available when no user is
logged on, you could also have a single process that runs
when a user logs on.
Mark
Mark Salsbery
Microsoft MVP - Visual C++
![Java | [Coffee]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/coffee.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
|
All this documentation reads like stereo instructions.
It seems that there are many what-if's -- that the chances of an interactive service working in most cases, is slim.
Would you think that it's prudent to avoid an interactive service?
And, that the prudent choice is to write 2 apps -- service (running all of the time) and a user app which runs in the user session.
And, then create some inter-app communication to handle notifications?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<br />
Peter Weyzen<br />
Staff Engineer<br />
<a href="http://www.soonr.com">SoonR Inc -- PC Power delivered to your phone</a>
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
