|
For general programming searches (besides the CodeProject  ), try Krugle[^].
Regards,
Thomas Stockwell
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning.
Visit my Blog
|
|
|
|
|
Nice, but I'll stick to google
"The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
"Not only do you continue to babble nonsense, you can't even correctly remember the nonsense you babbled just minutes ago." - Rob Graham
|
|
|
|
|
Check this it seems more better then google (but I don't think so,I stick again google too)
http://www.cuil.com/info/[^][^]
I Love T-SQL
"Don't torture yourself,let the life to do it for you."
|
|
|
|
|
That one bites. Looked at it, and will stick with google
"The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
"Not only do you continue to babble nonsense, you can't even correctly remember the nonsense you babbled just minutes ago." - Rob Graham
|
|
|
|
|
It worth to use it (www.cuil.com) time by time,why not. 
I Love T-SQL
"Don't torture yourself,let the life to do it for you."
|
|
|
|
|
Blue_Boy wrote: It worth to use it (www.cuil.com) time by time,why not.
Because, and not to labour too fine a point here, IT SUCKS.
One of the reasons people like google is because it's simple and the interface is clean.
This interface, redefines suckyness to a power of 100. It's like somebody took suck at school and decided to become the Emeritus Professor of Suck. I don't care how clever the freakin' interface is - if I can't get to the information I need within a minute then you haven't helped me you steamin' pile of suckin' interface. Perhaps we could coin a new word for it - the SUCKIFACE.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: not to labour too fine a point here, IT SUCKS
Amen to that. I recall someone posting a link to the said search engine in the Soapbox, it got poor review, and, well, let's just leave it at that 
"The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
"Not only do you continue to babble nonsense, you can't even correctly remember the nonsense you babbled just minutes ago." - Rob Graham
|
|
|
|
|
Blue_Boy wrote: worth to use it (www.cuil.com) time by time,why not
It is really lame, I've tried some of the typical search strings I use in google, and cuil's search results just really bite badly.
"The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
"Not only do you continue to babble nonsense, you can't even correctly remember the nonsense you babbled just minutes ago." - Rob Graham
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds nice ... but if the interface with a fewer lines of text  but nice ... thanks for sharing it !
Sincerely Samer Abu Rabie
Note: Please remember to rate this post to help others whom reading it.
|
|
|
|
|
What a steaming pile of crud this site is. It's too busy, and too complicated - it's simpler to use Google (and a lot cleaner). By your length of time on this site, I'd have to say you were spamming us.
|
|
|
|
|
I would stick to Google, i think guy will earn dollars if we search on his site so i would stick to google only.
“You will never be a leader unless you first learn to follow and be led.”
–Tiorio
"Coming together is a beginning, staying together is progress, and working together is success." Henry Ford
|
|
|
|
|
Im trying to write a Notepad type application which doesn't have the 1024 characters per line restriction. does anyone have any ideas on how to allow a line limitless (or at least a very high number - 1000000) characeters?
any help would be great!!
|
|
|
|
|
Humm
Are you using a specific control to display your text?
I recently read a C# book : "Dissecting a C# application"
in this book the authors are dissecting all parts of SharpDevelop application (C# editor), they created an editor from the scratch.
You can check-it it might be helpful.
|
|
|
|
|
No, im just using a multiline textbox
|
|
|
|
|
Use a rich text box
DaveBTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)Expect everything to be hard and then enjoy the things that come easy. (code-frog)
|
|
|
|
|
Good choice!
use a rich text box.
But i thik that is has number of caracter limitation like notpad.
have a line that contains more than 10000 caracter is a little bit WTF ?
no ?
|
|
|
|
|
lisan_al_ghaib wrote: have a line that contains more than 10000 caracter is a little bit WTF ?
I wholeheartedly agree 
"The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
"Not only do you continue to babble nonsense, you can't even correctly remember the nonsense you babbled just minutes ago." - Rob Graham
|
|
|
|
|
Nevertheless, a limitation is a limitation. :P
“Time and space can be a bitch.”
–Gushie, Quantum Leap
{o,o}.oO( Looking for a great RSS reader? Try FeedBeast! )
|)””’) Built with home-grown CodeProject components!
-”-”-
|
|
|
|
|
I think he meant a multiline control that will take >10000 characters total  At leat I hope so!
The character limit for a RTB is 2147483647 (Int32.MaxValue).
DaveBTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)Expect everything to be hard and then enjoy the things that come easy. (code-frog)
|
|
|
|
|
I have a struct that holds two longs (Low and High). This struct is used as a property (FullRange) in a user control(RangeControl) which I've dropped on a form. The values are not being serialized in the InitializeComponent in the form's designer.cs file so are therefore not persisted.
I expected to see something like
this.rangeControl1.FullRange = new Range((long)1, (long)50);
If I change the struct to a class it creates a variable for the property in the InitializeComponent and saves the values.
range1.High = ((long)(50));
range1.Low = ((long)(1));
this.rangeControl1.FullRange = range1;
How can I get the struct to persist?
DaveBTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)Expect everything to be hard and then enjoy the things that come easy. (code-frog)
|
|
|
|
|
7 hours later and solved it - I had a problem with my CreateInstance override so the designer wasn't able to call the contructor to be able to do the serialization. It's unbeleivable just how tricky this was to do!
Credit to the code in this[^] article which I used for comparison to my code to trace the problem.
DaveBTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)Expect everything to be hard and then enjoy the things that come easy. (code-frog)
|
|
|
|
|
I want to get a matrix of 3*3 and in which the invividual row sum,column sum and diagonal sum should be equal.and the out put shuold be all those matices whose total sum shold be upto hundred(individual row,column or diagonal)And yes all the numbers in the matrix has to be unique.
|
|
|
|
|
it smells Homework 
google is your friend,
You can search for sudoku algorithm
|
|
|
|
|
Ranjit Chaturvedi wrote: .................URGENT
In that case I'll drop everything I'm doing and get right on to it for you shall I?
DaveBTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)Expect everything to be hard and then enjoy the things that come easy. (code-frog)
|
|
|
|
|
DaveyM69 wrote:
In that case I'll drop everything I'm doing and get right on to it for you shall I?
You better stop asking such stupid questions and help him IMMEDIATELY!!! 
modified 12-Sep-18 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
