|
In one of my project's , I remember we had two saperate build
one for 64-bit & one for 32-bit machine < although i dont like it >
We had to get/beg all 3-rd party dll to be 64-bit.
Vikas Amin
My First Article on CP" Virtual Serial Port "[^]
modified on Thursday, July 24, 2008 5:33 PM
|
|
|
|
|
I'm trying to set a combo box on the forum to the corresponding item I'm passing it through the constructor, but it just ignores the value I'm passing it, and displays the first item in the combo box item collection. That data I'm trying to pass is taken from a deserialized XML file. Please let me know if there's anything else I need to provide you with for help Thanks.
this is how I'm binding the combo box's, in the designer.
this.cmbResults.DataSource = System.Enum.GetValues(typeof(PickItResult));
this.cmbQuality.DataSource = System.Enum.GetValues(typeof(D2Data.ItemQuality));
this.cmbItemType.DataSource = System.Enum.GetValues(typeof(D2Data.ItemType));
this.cmbItemClass.DataSource = System.Enum.GetValues(typeof(D2Data.ItemClass));
'the constructor I'm trying to set the combo box item in, i've tried many different things
public Requirements(string description, string mods, D2Data.ItemQuality quality, D2Data.ItemType type, D2Data.ItemClass itemClass, string stats, PickItResult result)
{
InitializeComponent();
this.description = description;
this.mods = mods;
this.quality = quality;
this.type = type;
this.itemClass = itemClass;
this.result = result;
this.stats = stats;
txtDescription.Text = description;
cmbResults.SelectedItem = Enum.Parse(typeof(PickItResult), result.ToString());
cmbQuality.SelectedItem = Enum.Parse(typeof(D2Data.ItemQuality), quality.ToString());
txtMods.Text = mods;
txtStats.Text = stats;
}
|
|
|
|
|
Try setting the SelectedItem property in the Form's FormLoaded handler. The underlying Windows combo box doesn't exist at the point you're doing it now.
Phil
The opinions expressed in this post are not necessarily those of the author, especially if you find them impolite, inaccurate or inflammatory.
|
|
|
|
|
thank you very much, this was driving me nuts. Figured it was something simple like this lol.
|
|
|
|
|
I am using 3rd party hardware and as a result, their software (off to a bad start) and their response to this question is deal with it. I can't change the hardware.
The problem is the hardware produces a 3 byte value which is stored as an int, ie in 4 bytes. The 3 bytes are stored in the three most significant bytes of the int and the least significant byte of the int is left as 0. If the 3 bytes were 12 34 56 they would be stored as 12 34 56 00. Thus if one tries to pull the bytes out as ints the appearance is the value has been multiplied.
My solution at the moment is to bit shift each element in the array by 8. The arrays can be large. Any ideas about a faster approach?
Thanks Jim
this thing looks like it was written by an epileptic ferret
Dave Kreskowiak
|
|
|
|
|
jimwawar wrote: Any ideas about a faster approach?
Probably not what you want to do in this case... but you can divide by 256, which gives me about a 5-10% improvement on my system, but I would test that with your setup.
Here's probably what you want to do.
You don't discuss your application but you should be able to write your application logic (the calculations and business algorithms) using the numbers as they are given to you by the hardware... as is. Do all the math, comparisons, and manipulation with respect to how the numbers are represented by the hardware. Then convert them to "normal numbers" only when they need to be presented to the end user.
Here's what I mean (and I am totally making up this example):
Let's say that your hardware is returning temperature data from a large series of sensors. You have to determine if the numbers are in an acceptable range (in my hyptothetical senario, 80,000 +/- 10,000 is acceptable). But the hardware gives you the data in the three-most significant bytes (it's giving you the bytes as 12 34 56 00, which is 203,569,152).
So, instead of writing:
for (int probeID = 0; probeID < 1000000; probeID++)
{
int data = GetProbeData(probeID);
data = data >> 8;
if (<code>data < 70000</code> || <code>data > 90000</code>)
Console.WriteLine("Value out of range: {0}", data);
}
Just write:
for (int probeID = 0; probeID < 1000000; probeID++)
{
int data = GetProbeData(probeID);
if (<code>data < 17920000</code> || <code>data > 23040000</code>)
Console.WriteLine("Value out of range: {0}", data >> 8);
}
That assumes that most of the processing time is spent gathering and manipulating the data and not displaying it, which is typically the case.
Oh, and I would probably keep all the number in hex (in the source code) so you can avoid all the conversions:
12 34 56 00 (from hardware) = 203569152 (0x0c223800 in hex)
00 12 34 56 (what you want) = 795192 (0x000c2238 in hex, easier to visualize the bytes)
Enjoy,
Robert C. Cartaino
|
|
|
|
|
|
dan neely wrote: you've spread your weirdness all over the app instead of having it all contained in a single location at input time.
I do agree that I would not take such an extreme measure, unless performance is paramount. Coding for performance only is rarely pretty. In the context of the question -- how can you optimize x >> 8 -- I'm hard-pressed to come up with something significantly faster than avoiding the manipulation altogether. If you absolutely need it, it wouldn't be pretty.
|
|
|
|
|
Robert.C.Cartaino wrote: about a 5-10% improvement
On mine it took more than twice four times as long.
modified on Saturday, August 2, 2008 6:03 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
If performance is the first priority, use unsafe code to access the array using a byte pointer. Something like:
fixed (byte* p = &theArray) {
for (int i = 0; i < theArray.Length; i++) {
p++;
byte lo = *(p++);
byte mid = *(p++);
byte hi = *(p++);
}
}
Despite everything, the person most likely to be fooling you next is yourself.
|
|
|
|
|
I was thinking of something similar; effectively using the byte preceding the array as the first byte, easy enough in C, but I don't think it would work in .net.
If he's reading bytes from a socket or similar, it's not a big deal.
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: using the byte preceding the array as the first byte
You mean to effectively shifting the int value by eight bits?
There might be performance problems with accessing an int on an odd adress, so it would probably be faster to just shift the value, and it certainly is simpler.
Despite everything, the person most likely to be fooling you next is yourself.
|
|
|
|
|
Guffa wrote: shifting the int value
Shifting the entire array at once, but without actually moving it.
Guffa wrote: and it certainly is simpler
Yeah, I'd just stick with the right shift and be done with it.
It comes down to: "If performance is important, don't use .net."
Edit: I was thinking backward; I meant skip the first byte. I've now tried it in C, I just need to decide how I want to handle the last int.
modified on Saturday, August 2, 2008 1:23 PM
|
|
|
|
|
I made a few performance tests, and it looks like my suspicion about accessing ints on an odd address was correct.
It takes slightly longer (about 3%) to access the value using an adjusted pointer compared to just getting the value from the array and shifting it.
Despite everything, the person most likely to be fooling you next is yourself.
|
|
|
|
|
Here's what I just worked up in C, I still have compared it with shifting each int:
int masks[] = { 0xFFFFFFFF , 0x00FFFFFF , 0x0000FFFF , 0x000000FF } ;
int
ShiftAndSumArray
(
int* Array
,
unsigned Length
,
unsigned Shift
)
{
int result = 0 ;
int* a = (int*) ( ((char*) Array) + ( Shift %= sizeof(int) ) ) ;
unsigned i ;
for ( i = 0 ; i < Length-1 ; i++ )
{
result += a [ i ] ;
}
result += a [ i ] & masks [ Shift ] ;
return ( result ) ;
}
int a[] = { 0x00000100 , 0x00000100 , 0x00000100 , 0x00000100 } ;
printf ( "%d\n" , ShiftAndSumArray ( a , 4 , 1 ) ) ;
It may be possible in C#, but I haven't tried it.
|
|
|
|
|
Ha ha ha! Here it is in C#
private static readonly int[] masks = unchecked ( new int[] { (int) 0xFFFFFFFF , 0x00FFFFFF , 0x0000FFFF , 0x000000FF } ) ;
public static unsafe int
ShiftAndSumArray
(
int[] Array
,
uint Shift
)
{
int result = 0 ;
fixed ( int* b = Array )
{
int* a = (int*) ( ((byte*) b) + ( Shift %= sizeof(int) ) ) ;
int i ;
for ( i = 0 ; i < Array.Length-1 ; i++ )
{
result += a [ i ] ;
}
result += a [ i ] & masks [ Shift ] ;
}
return ( result ) ;
}
This appears to take about half the time of shifting each int separately, but it doesn't involve very much time either way;
100,000,000 (10,000 passes across an array of 10,000 ints) this way takes 507 milliseconds, the shifting technique takes 969 milliseconds.
(And 2665 milliseconds for the division technique.)
public static int
ShiftAndSumArray2
(
int[] Array
,
uint Shift
)
{
int result = 0 ;
int shift = (int) Shift % sizeof(int) * 8 ;
for ( int i = 0 ; i < Array.Length ; i++ )
{
result += Array [ i ] >> shift ;
}
return ( result ) ;
}
Correction: Earlier I had forgotten to Reset the Stopwatch  , corrected results
457 milliseconds for altered pointer
459 milliseconds for shifted values
1768 milliseconds for division
I have also quickened up the implementations somewhat.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
I have localizable form having some buttons and datagridview.
I added all the columns at design time to the datagridview.
Then I translated the localized version, say in German.
When I change the my culture info at run time, all buttons show the localized (translated)
texts, but my gridview does't show the translated column headers.
Any idea?
Thanks,
Muharrem
|
|
|
|
|
i don´t know how to set the columns headers name in c#, because i do it in sql.
But i bet it´s easy.
Now, are the data (to the datagridview) comming from sql database?
if right, write then there not in c#. 
|
|
|
|
|
Let me more specific.
I added datagridview control to my form.
Then I edited columns through the property window in vs2005. So I added some column with names and columns header. I also defined the DataPropertyName of the column to the column which is in my
result table coming from a database table.So far so good.But I am also having the form in a different
language created with Localizable property of the form. In this second form I changed the column headers in design mode. What I expect is to see the localized column header when I change the form to
the localized version. All my other controls display their respective localized text but not gridview.
Any idea?
Thanks again
Muharrem
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all, I have a service that is supposed to show a form when starting, however it doesn't...
protected override void OnStart(string[] args)
{
runCapture();
base.OnStart(args);
}
System.IO.StreamWriter file;
public void runCapture()
{
try
{
requestCapture reqCap = new requestCapture();
reqCap.Show();
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
file = new StreamWriter(new FileStream("C:\\xampp\\htdocs\\captures\\Error_Log.log", System.IO.FileMode.Append));
this.file.WriteLine(ex.ToString());
this.file.Flush();
}
}
The thing is, it never errors either...
|
|
|
|
|
There are security issues with allowing services UI permissions like displaying forms. However, if this does not concern you and you have not done so already, you may be able to view the form via the service if you ensure you are using a local system account to start your service, and check the 'Allow Service to interact with desktop' check box in the log on properties of the service.
I think a better idea would be to have the UI separate from the service, and have the service communicate with the UI via a named pipe or...whatever...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do you want to get data from a database and display in your application datagridview?
// this is a routine i wrote
public static void SP_WITH_DATAGRIDVIEW(string SP, DataGridView DATAGRIDVIEW_X, string PARAMETER_NAME1, SqlDbType SQLDBTYPE1, object OBJECT1, string PARAMETER_NAME2, SqlDbType SQLDBTYPE2, object OBJECT2)
{
SqlConnection conn = new SqlConnection(your_connection_string);
SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand();
cmd.Connection = conn;
cmd.CommandText = SP;
cmd.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure;
// how many parameters to you have? here is 2, and of what kind?
cmd.Parameters.Add(PARAMETER_NAME1, SQLDBTYPE1).Value = OBJECT1;
cmd.Parameters.Add(PARAMETER_NAME2, SQLDBTYPE2).Value = OBJECT2;
conn.Open();
SqlDataAdapter sql_da = new SqlDataAdapter();
sql_da.SelectCommand = cmd;
DataTable dt = new DataTable();
sql_da.Fill(dt);
conn.Close();
DATAGRIDVIEW_X.DataSource = dt;
}
Good luck!!!
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
