|
Do you have more users than computers?
Otherwise it doesn't make sense to me.
|
|
|
|
|
No.
Could you explain what you would do?
We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
blog: TDD - the Aha! | Linkify!| FoldWithUs! | sighist
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry for not answering, it's been really nice weather (still is) and I'm on vacation 
Something you could try to do is to create mandatory user profiles for the computers where people should have the same profile. The users would still log on with their personal account and therefore retain their personal rights on the fileserver, but they would get the same profile at logon. All changes to the profile would of course be lost at logoff.
My (very unclear) question was referring to your CALs. What I should have asked is if you have user based or device based CALs. Normally the CAL is user based and you can connect as many computers as you feel like as long as you have one CAL per user. Device based CALs basically only make sense if you have more users than computers which might be the case where you're working in shift.
BTW, slow Domain Controllers are usually DNS related.
|
|
|
|
|
You are right, the reference to CAL's was pointless.
I found a neat trick (see below), so I don't have to mess around with the profiles. Anyway, thanks for helping!
Jörgen Andersson wrote: BTW, slow Domain Controllers are usually DNS related.
Yeah, every little issue I google blames DNS. However, clients seem to be set up correctly, and error logs don't show anything. Do you knwo a good, complete article/checklist what to check and could be wrong?
We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
blog: TDD - the Aha! | Linkify!| FoldWithUs! | sighist
|
|
|
|
|
Point one and two on my checklist is netdiag and dcdiag thats included with the support tools on the server cd
|
|
|
|
|
Mount the share permanently under all the Domain credentials, making everyone a domain member. When the laptop's on the network everything will now be fine. Also give everyone who uses the laptop detached a local user account on the laptop that does not have the share at all. Make the credentials for the local accounts the same as the domain ones. Users will still attempt to log onto the domain when disconected and most times it will work due to cached credentials but at least when they have problems you can tell them they should use their local machine account when not on the network.
This probably isn't ideal for you but it's the only way we've managed to get a workable solution in exactly the same situation.
"The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage."
Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)
|
|
|
|
|
I found a trick, see my post below.
We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
blog: TDD - the Aha! | Linkify!| FoldWithUs! | sighist
|
|
|
|
|
I found something that does what I want, so no messing around with the domain necessary 
create a batch file
net use W: \\server\share
but store it on \\server\share (or a sub folder)
Create a shortcut to the batch file, using \\server\share (NOT W:\..)
When starting the shortcut, windows will ask for credentials to access the share. When it reache sthe net use, you are already authenticated. 
With some extras:
(allow to run multiple times, error checking, open explorer)
<br />
@echo off<br />
<br />
IF EXIST W:\NUL goto OK<br />
net use w: \\wolfgang\exchange<br />
IF EXIST W:\NUL goto OK<br />
<br />
echo could not mount server share. Error=%ERRORLEVEL%<br />
pause<br />
goto END<br />
<br />
:OK<br />
start explorer /e,/select,W:\User<br />
goto END<br />
<br />
:END<br />
We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
blog: TDD - the Aha! | Linkify!| FoldWithUs! | sighist
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have added two domain names to the hosts file (in Windows XP SP2) and mapped both of them to 127.0.0.1 (for the sake of developing the sites on the local machine), one of them correctly returns 127.0.0.1 when using the ping command, the other one insists on returning its IP on the internet! (the ISP parking server), I used ipconfig /flushdns multiple times and checked the hosts file a zillion times but still no use! the problem has been present for several days now so I don't think it's a caching problem .. what's really weird is that only one of them is working, if both were not working it would have been ok but why only one?!!
|
|
|
|
|
I am trying to setup a Windows Server 2003 server to act as a software router.
It has 2 NIC's:
NIC1 is the Private Network, with static IP, and null Gateway.
NIC2 is the Public Network, with static IP, DNS, Gateway etc.
I also runs DNS and DHCP services, along with AD (and aware of all the security issues...)
I have run the RRAS wizard, and selected both private and public interface for NAT, as in http://www.windowsnetworking.com/articles_tutorials/NAT_Windows_2003_Setup_Configuration.html[^]
The porblem is that only the server is succsfully connecting with outside world, while clients cannot access outside addresses.
A ping of external site, by a clients, results in the address being shown of the site, and no reply.
It is as if all incomming connings are blocked, or not correctly routed.
What am I missing here ?
|
|
|
|
|
The clients default gateway is the IP or the interal NIC on the server right?
a ping isn't really that good a test either, especially pinging external IPs.
Haven't done this with Windows, but having setup PIXs and ASAs I'm not sure you want to enable NAT on the private interface. You want to NAT traffic from your internal LAN out through the public interface, but I'm not sure if this would be accomplished by enabling NAT on the private interface in Windows or not.
Just out of curiosity if you type: "route print" at the command line, does it show 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 to have the gateway for external traffic?
Any reason your not just using a Linksys or similar box to perform this?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I changed the internal nic to static 192.168.10.3, with DHPC range 192.168.10.x.
Public NIC is still the same, only now the DNS shows to the new internal address 192.168.10.3.
Firewall is off on private interface.
Clients can ping outside interface successfully.
No static routes are defined(yet ?)
No RIP enabled (yet)
All Firewalling is of.
No filters are defined.
DHCP Router(Option3) set to 192.168.10.3
DHCP DNS Server(Option6) set to 192.168.10.3
DNS Interfaces set to 'ALL'
DNS Forwarders set to ISP DNS1 and DNS2
Clients are unable to ping ISP DNS1 and DNS2, although server can.
Should we have a look at RIP2 then and what do the settings need to be.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, I have a problem with my windows server 2003 Sp1 DNS service. The problem is the DNS service on windows usually stop whether I changed its setting to Automatic Start for DNS Server service. As network administrator, I didn't change any setting relating to DNS service after I have configure it correctly.
From here, I would like to know whether some of you experience with any virus that could stop DNS from running? When its stop, my whole organization could not access to an internet for a while. So I have to enable it every time to solve the problem. My concern is sometime I need to travel away from my office and this problem occure, so there would be nobody could solve this problem.
Thank in advance
|
|
|
|
|
You did read this one[^]
in the daily CP newsletter, did you?
I hope your problem is something else tho.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you very much for your reply
|
|
|
|
|
I would update to Service Pack 2 first of all, there is always the chance that will solve the problem, plus probably better of at SP 2 anyway if at all possible.
Are there any errors in the event logs related to the DNS service? Is all DNS name resolution on the network failing or just Internet related queries?
I probably wouldn't point to a virus for this problem, although its tough to say from your description. Up to date virus signatures and a full scan are never a bad idea though.
You may want to try reinstalling DNS if updating to SP 2 doesn't help. (If you only have one DNS server and you're using Active Directory you might want to look for a MS document on how they say to do this, if there is one.)
|
|
|
|
|
requesttimedout wrote: I would update to Service Pack 2 first of all, there is always the chance that will solve the problem, plus probably better of at SP 2 anyway if at all possible.
Thank you very much for your comment. I have run windows update on the server and found that its recommend to update to windows 2003 sp2. Currently this server is acting as domain controller and file server which share a document to all user in the organization. As I have discussed with my team, I not sure whether if I apply sp2, whether the the server could running properly or not (may be it could cause some problem with any device driver, or strict any security seeting) which could cause a trouble for user to access the resource on the server. If you have any experience with sp2 on windows 2003, please let me know whether it have any problem or not after you apply it.
requesttimedout wrote: Are there any errors in the event logs related to the DNS service? Is all DNS name resolution on the network failing or just Internet related queries?
When I found that the DNS server service is stopped, around 70% of my client couldn't access to an internet. But each client I also configure with an alternative ISP DNS. I also have some problem with my router too which could make me difficult to find the problem. After I turn off the router for 10 mintue and restart the DNS services, every body could access the internet again. I have check an event viewer to find the cause of the problem but I didn't found any entry that could cause DNS server service to stop. But I found the below entry that is related to the DNS server service:
Event Type: Error<br />
Event Source: DNS<br />
Event Category: None<br />
Event ID: 4007<br />
Date: 18-Jul-08<br />
Time: 8:10:52 AM<br />
User: N/A<br />
Computer: SERVER<br />
Description:<br />
The DNS server was unable to open zone _msdcs.pr.org.kh in the Active Directory from the application directory partition ForestDnsZones.pr.org.kh. This DNS server is configured to obtain and use information from the directory for this zone and is unable to load the zone without it. Check that the Active Directory is functioning properly and reload the zone. The event data is the error code.<br />
For more information, see Help and Support Center at http:
Data:<br />
0000: 0d 00 00 00 ....
and
Event Type: Error<br />
Event Source: DNS<br />
Event Category: None<br />
Event ID: 4007<br />
Date: 18-Jul-08<br />
Time: 4:40:01 PM<br />
User: N/A<br />
Computer: SERVER<br />
Description:<br />
The DNS server was unable to open zone pr.org.kh in the Active Directory from the application directory partition DomainDnsZones.pr.org.kh. This DNS server is configured to obtain and use information from the directory for this zone and is unable to load the zone without it. Check that the Active Directory is functioning properly and reload the zone. The event data is the error code.<br />
For more information, see Help and Support Center at http:
Data:<br />
0000: 0d 00 00 00 ....
requesttimedout wrote: If you only have one DNS server and you're using Active Directory you might want to look for a MS document on how they say to do this, if there is one.)
The DNS Server and Domain Controller is set in the same machine. Please let me know if you have any idea. Thank in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
Personally I have not run into any problems with SP2. I manage quite a few Windows 2003 Servers and I have not run into a problem. If you're worried about driver compatibility you can research that with the vendor that the server came from, or if a custom built you can look into individual components.
I personally would never configure a domain controller to have DNS point to anything but itself or another internal DNS server. I would not point a DC to an external DNS server. Pointing clients to another DNS server is probably alright, although if you configure DNS to use forwarders for external queries it isn't really necessary.
You might not be doing this, you said only clients, so that might not be relevant.
Can you access the internet when the DNS Server Service is stopped? IE ... telnet to port 25 or 80 of some external server that you reference by IP address, thus bypassing DNS resolution all together?
|
|
|
|
|
As a temporary solution, to allow you to leave your office, you could set the service to restart automatically.
In the services console, doubleclick the dns-service (or rightclick and select Properties). In the properties window select the recovery tab and select your options on failure.
You naturally need to address the issue why the service fails. But to help you with that we need more data, such as relevant entries in the event log.
When you have fixed the problem. don't leave the setting on automatic restart. It might prevent you from finding out that you're having a problem. Atleast if you like me read the eventlog irregularily.
|
|
|
|
|
Jörgen Andersson wrote: As a temporary solution, to allow you to leave your office, you could set the service to restart automatically.
In the services console, doubleclick the dns-service (or rightclick and select Properties). In the properties window select the recovery tab and select your options on failure.
Thank you very much for your comment. That is one solution that could help me to temporary solve it.
Jörgen Andersson wrote: You naturally need to address the issue why the service fails. But to help you with that we need more data, such as relevant entries in the event log.
That was my biggest challenge. I have checked in the event viewer and there is no entry that show me the reason why DNS server service is stopped. But I found the following error related to DNS server service that could give you some idea:
Event Type: Error<br />
Event Source: DNS<br />
Event Category: None<br />
Event ID: 4007<br />
Date: 18-Jul-08<br />
Time: 8:10:52 AM<br />
User: N/A<br />
Computer: SERVER<br />
Description:<br />
The DNS server was unable to open zone _msdcs.pr.org.kh in the Active Directory from the application directory partition ForestDnsZones.pr.org.kh. This DNS server is configured to obtain and use information from the directory for this zone and is unable to load the zone without it. Check that the Active Directory is functioning properly and reload the zone. The event data is the error code.<br />
For more information, see Help and Support Center at http:
Data:<br />
0000: 0d 00 00 00 ....
and
Event Type: Error<br />
Event Source: DNS<br />
Event Category: None<br />
Event ID: 4007<br />
Date: 18-Jul-08<br />
Time: 4:40:01 PM<br />
User: N/A<br />
Computer: SERVER<br />
Description:<br />
The DNS server was unable to open zone pr.org.kh in the Active Directory from the application directory partition DomainDnsZones.pr.org.kh. This DNS server is configured to obtain and use information from the directory for this zone and is unable to load the zone without it. Check that the Active Directory is functioning properly and reload the zone. The event data is the error code.<br />
For more information, see Help and Support Center at http:
Data:<br />
0000: 0d 00 00 00 ....
Please let me know if you have any solution with the above error escription. Thank in advance!!!
|
|
|
|
|
If you get these eventlog entries when the server is started, then it's normal, the dns service has just started before the AD.
Try to uninstall and reinstall the DNS role on the server. That will fix any eventual file and registry errors regarding the DNS, and it's done in ten minutes (no restart) so it won't really affect the users.
About the servicepack: I always servicepack my computers a couple of weeks after the packs are released. They fix more problems than they create. And if there are any serious errors in them, it would create enough articles about it that it would raise above the normal internet noise.
But of course, as always you need a proper backup before you do it!
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
I have a pc with pre-install winXP. Now i would like to install win2000 in it. Everytime after it inspecting my system, then will prompt me "inaccessible_boot_device" message. I know it could be cause by the hard disk controller (i am using SATA hardisk). May i know how to solve this problem?
thanks in advance
regards
cocoon_wls
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
I have found a solution which is said that need to extract the Intel(R) 82801GR/GH SATA AHCI Controller Windows driver to a floppy disk.After that press F6 to add the SCSI at the begining step.Last continue the installation as normal. I had follow the tips and do it,but it still prompt me the error message above.Below is the link i follow to fix the problem:
http://downloadmirror.intel.com/15551/ENG/readme.txt[^]
thanks in advance 
cocoonwls
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
