|
Really all I'm trying to do is recreate Visual Studio's form desinger. I think adding DirectDraw would be overkill.
|
|
|
|
|
You got me interested!
What do you mean recreate VisualStudio's form designer?
I think there is a way you can just import the functionality from a the original libary. I think its located in C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio .NET\Common7\IDE\Microsoft.VSDesigner.dll.
If you want to do it another way, it can get very messy very fast. Ie. if you draw directly on the screen you then have to do hooks to handle the mouse events...
Good luck to you. By the way, ASP WebMatrix did an ASP think like this. They have a VisualStudio like UI, with with the ASP webforms designer surface.
|
|
|
|
|
To answer your question directly, this is how you can draw on the screen:
System.Drawing.Graphics g = System.Drawing.Graphics.FromHwnd(System.IntPtr.Zero);
-or, something like this-
IntPtr handle = System.IntPtr.Zero;
System.Drawing.Graphics g = System.Drawing.Graphics.FromHdc(handle);
--
Basicly you need to tell it you use null as the handle. This creates a graphics object that draw on top of everything. But, it can be very messy.
|
|
|
|
|
AK,
I tried both suggestions. The second throws an exception and the first doesnt crash but it doesn't do anything. Can you give me a link to a web page about using the null pointer to gain access to the screen?
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I read AK's article and experimented with his second solution. It did throw an exception. And I modify it as follow and now it works:
IntPtr hdc = GetDC(IntPtr.Zero); // get hdc for the screen
Graphics g = Graphics.FromHdc(hdc);
g.DrawLine(new Pen(Color.Blue), 0,0,500,500); // draw a line for testing.
g.Dispose(); // <- I don't know if I should use g.Dispose or g.ReleaseHdc here...
ReleaseDC(IntPtr.Zero,hdc);
GetDC & ReleaseDC are Win32 API in user32.dll
Hope this could help you
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, I forgot to tell you to use GetDC.
I knew I missed something.
|
|
|
|
|
I've never tried this, so it may or may not work but here goes
Create a control the same size as the Form (a panel would do), now when you want to draw your grid or whatever above the Form you do several things....
form will be the Form you are trying to draw on top of
parent will be the panel or whatever that the Form is sitting on top of
<br />
Graphics g = parent.CreateGraphics();<br />
PaintEventArgs e = new PaintEventArgs(e, form.Bounds);<br />
<br />
InvokePaint(form, e); <br />
<br />
James
"And we are all men; apart from the females." - Colin Davies
|
|
|
|
|
James,
Hmm, I've been trying a similar approach but I like yours better because there is only a single surface to draw on. My only question is will I need to make your panel Transparent? I ask because I’ve been trying to create a user control with the graphics drawn on it around the edges. Then I was going to make the background color transparent and place this usercontrol over the other control (lets say it is a button) already on the form. In this way the button would show threw and my usercontrol's graphics would indicate that the button has been selected; even though the user control completely covers the button.
The only problem is that I can't make the usercontrol transparent!!! Will I have to make your panel transparent too. Because this just isn't working for me.
|
|
|
|
|
Here you go, a quick demo showing how its done
It doesn't paint the non-client area but I think you can send some messages to windows to get it to do that (just need to call GetHdc/ReleaseHdc when passing it to windows).
InvokePaintTest.zip (8.1 Kb)
James
"And we are all men; apart from the females." - Colin Davies
|
|
|
|
|
Wow, thanks James 
I tried out your sample just now and its pretty cool. I'm probably not going to use it though because I want to keep the controls on the same form BUT if the screen painting turns out to be a hassle I’ll definitely come back to your solution.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
I was wondering if there is an attribute that can be applied to a class/struct that tells the compiler not to compile it?
Thanx
MYrc : A .NET IRC client with C# Plugin Capabilities. See
http://sourceforge.net/projects/myrc for more info.
|
|
|
|
|
 
Am I missing something? Could you explain your situation a bit more?
James
"And we are all men; apart from the females." - Colin Davies
|
|
|
|
|
I mean it must have some functionality e.g. lets call it an IncompleteAttribute (maybe NotImplementedAttribute) that one would be able to apply to a class/struct (what about maethods and properties) , so when one compile the project that those classes/structs doesnot get compiled.
This would be neat especcially working on a library of classes when certian classes might not be working as it should or the structure has just been put in place. Hey, even class status for example, like WorkingButWithErrors, etc.
I hope you understand a better. 
PS: If there is not such an Attribute, would it be difficult to do?
MYrc : A .NET IRC client with C# Plugin Capabilities. See
http://sourceforge.net/projects/myrc for more info. 
|
|
|
|
|
There aren't any attributes to stop code from getting compiled, because attributes don't play a part until code execution (except for attributes that the compiler looks for, but this is after the code has been compiled but before the assembly is created).
So you are left with commenting out or #if/#endif
James
"And we are all men; apart from the females." - Colin Davies
|
|
|
|
|
|
I hear this works fine:
<br />
class MyClass<br />
{<br />
//Insert methods here<br />
}<br />
*/
David Stone
It seemed similar to someone saying, "Would you like to meet my knife collection?"
Ryan Johnston on Elaine's sig
|
|
|
|
|
Hey leppie,
Did you try the following compiler directive?
#if(false)
.... Your Class
#endif
(But David's solution is easier to type);)
This will keep the compiler from even seeing your class. (But is this what you want to do?) Perhaps what you want is a forward reference? What is your situation?
|
|
|
|
|
Ahhh, mite just be what im looking for Re David solution: I prefer the colors although it works just as well
MYrc : A .NET IRC client with C# Plugin Capabilities. See
http://sourceforge.net/projects/myrc for more info.
|
|
|
|
|
if you are using vstudio, and you are being a good boy and putting each class in its own file... then you can change the "Build Action" property of the file to "None".
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
Is there anyone that can help me to better understand what's going on "under the hood" when subclassing a Control (System.Windows.Forms), and overriding the CreateParams property and setting the ClassName of it to, for example, a custom control, say Toolbar (Win32 real name ofcourse). How does my subclass relate to the native Toolbar control that is created? And how do I properly use WinProc (when to call base.WinProc etc) and/or DefWinProc for my subclass. Another thing I don't really grasp is how the message-flow is between my Control-subclass, and the actual TB (notifications from the TB for ex, do I receive them, and how?).
I guess what happens is that the new control (my subclass) becomes a superclass of the native Toolbar (receiving the messages destinated for the native TB before it self does) but I can figure out what base.WinProc/base.DefWinProc relates to respecivly.
Any help on any of theese topics are VERY apprechiated, may it be pointers to documentation, book suggestions, or any other kind of rescoruce.
Thanx a lot!!
/psatvz
per.samuelsson@visionizer.se
|
|
|
|
|
psatvz wrote:
how do I properly use WinProc (when to call base.WinProc etc) and/or DefWinProc
This seems to be Win API related, you might be better off posting in the Visual C++ forum, than here in the C# forum. 
Soliant | email
"The whole of science is nothing more than a refinement of everyday thinking." -Albert E.
|
|
|
|
|
hi all
why does VS scream at me for this?
public byte Panning
{
set
{
byte con = value;
if (con > 127) con = byte.MaxValue - con;
else con = Convert.ToByte(128) - con;
...
Im not even using int's , so WTF is going on?????? 
MYrc : A .NET IRC client with C# Plugin Capabilities. See
http://sourceforge.net/projects/myrc for more info.
|
|
|
|
|
|
not lame - this is what type safe and all the new features of C# is all about - if you convert an int to a byte then you could lose information - by forcing you to cast - you are declaring to the compiler thet you understand the consequences and except that this may happen.
Stupidity dies.
The end of future offspring.
Evolution wins.
- A Darwin Awards Haiku
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
Email: 