|
hi moonen,
it means..wt i did tell me.
regards
savitri
|
|
|
|
|
savitri wrote: it means..wt i did tell me.
 Could you please translate that into english so that I can understand ?
|
|
|
|
|
Yes U Can ...If U Can ,Dream it , U can do it ...ICAN
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Savitri,
Use CoCreateInstance to co-create your component. Once you get the interface pointer, you can call its functions.
Finally, don't forget to release the component after you finish your work.
See the help on CoCreateInstance and Release in MSDN  .
|
|
|
|
|
Hoe to retrive the html text box input using IHTMLElemt interface.
|
|
|
|
|
innerText property [^] looks promising. See also [^].
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
|
|
|
|
|
The docs says:
Most Boost libraries are header-only
So does it compiles very slow?
And any way to make it fast?
|
|
|
|
|
Boost libraries will slow down compilation, mainly due to the amount of code in the headers and the number of template instantiations needed. To speed it up, include Boost headers into a pre-compiled header. But not Boost.Bind or Boost.Lambda headers, as they use declare some objects that need to be single instance, and putting them in pre-compiled headers can mess that up.
You need to balance the convenience that Boost headers get you against the compile times. It's worth it 99% of the time.
|
|
|
|
|
I can't understand why it is worth. 99% of the time when using boost, I think the document should be enough, is it?
|
|
|
|
|
followait wrote: I can't understand why it is worth. 99% of the time when using boost, I think the document should be enough, is it?
Huh?
Steve
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for you help.
But I can't agree that header files contains so much implementations code, I think it will slow down the compilation a lot (not sure). Could you tell what's the benifit by doing so?
|
|
|
|
|
I still don't understand what your asking. Boost relies heavily on templates, which can tend to slow down compilation. The solution, as previously mentioned, is to use pre-compiled headers.
Steve
|
|
|
|
|
followait wrote: But I can't agree that header files contains so much implementations code,
Template code *has* to be in headers if you're going to instantiate it for different template parameters, because every time you instantiate, you create a new implementation of the class/function.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If it is, where can I find it?
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Not open as such, but it gets installed with versions of Visual Studio you pay for. In my VS2008 installation, it's in C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\VC\crt\src.
|
|
|
|
|
Actually is should be here (along with other things): "C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\VC\include". The CRT and the STL are two different things.
Steve
|
|
|
|
|
Call it a tie - we're both correct. Yes, CRT and STL are different, and yes, the include directory has most of the STL, but there's a reasonable amount of it that's in the crt/src directory as well (mostly code that's common across all template instantiations and pre-instantiated items like std::string (==std::basic_string<char>) and the streams.
|
|
|
|
|
I had problem in migrating from VC6 to VC2005
typedef _A::size_type size_type; works fine in the vc 6 and flashes the below error after migrating to VC 2005
"thirdparty\dinkumpatches\xstring(39) : error C2146: syntax error : missing ';' before identifier 'size_type'"
pls advice
|
|
|
|
|
it looks like the "_A" isnt defined. Look where it was defined in the VC6 and than you why it isnt defined in VS2005. I guess it is a define which surrounds the "_A".  Bad code
Greetings from Germany
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
In mfc I use CInternetSession to download files from an http server. What can I use via WTL?
Thanks,
Jayjay
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks,
Sorry what i meant was what can i use for ATL not WTL an ATL version of CInternet session.
|
|
|
|
|
You should be able to use this with ATL, it just wraps the WinInet API.
- S
50 cups of coffee and you know it's on!
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Will the distribute mfc libraries? Or even static link?
Because I think this still will.
Thanks,
Jayjay
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
