|
alichan wrote: I need to change the typematic rate/delay (moreover accessing leds). is there any way to do it without a device driver?
Have you tried changing the following:
HKCU\Control Panel\Keyboard\KeyboardDelay
"Love people and use things, not love things and use people." - Unknown
"To have a respect for ourselves guides our morals; to have deference for others governs our manners." - Laurence Sterne
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
How do I customize the standard property sheet buttons
I can change the text of the button using
CWnd *pWnd = GetDlgItem (ID_APPLY_NOW);
pWnd->SetWindowText("Hello");
but what i want to do it add an icon onto the button as well
Can any one help ?
thanks
simon
|
|
|
|
|
Associate a CBitmap object with the button and call its SetBitmap() method.
"Love people and use things, not love things and use people." - Unknown
"To have a respect for ourselves guides our morals; to have deference for others governs our manners." - Laurence Sterne
|
|
|
|
|
|
Im making a class to be used in a final project for my c++ class and in my game i need to create the object "shot" when the user shoots the problem is "this" when declaring Shot=new TImage(this); has to be a part of a member function.... heres my declaration of my class and the snipit of code where i create the object called "shot" please help 
#ifndef SpaceInvaders<br />
#define SpaceInvaders<br />
#include <Classes.hpp><br />
#include <Controls.hpp><br />
#include <StdCtrls.hpp><br />
#include <Forms.hpp><br />
#include <ExtCtrls.hpp><br />
#include <Graphics.hpp><br />
<br />
class SpaceInvaders{<br />
private:<br />
public:<br />
TImage *Shot;<br />
bool __fastcall Collide(TControl *C1, TControl *C2);<br />
void __fastcall Shots(TControl *C1);<br />
void UserMovement(TControl *C1);<br />
};<br />
TImage *Shot;
and when i create the object...
<br />
Shot=new TImage(*TForm1);<br />
Shot->Parent=Form1;<br />
Shot->Width=15;<br />
Shot->Proportional=true;<br />
Shot->Visible=true;<br />
Shot->Top=ShootFrom_Y;<br />
Shot->Left=ShootFrom_X-(Shot->Width/2);<br />
|
|
|
|
|
What's the problem?
"Love people and use things, not love things and use people." - Unknown
"To have a respect for ourselves guides our morals; to have deference for others governs our manners." - Laurence Sterne
|
|
|
|
|
I have read in a book that, the worst thing you can do for "optimizing the storage of constant data" is declaring a variable like..
CString g_str("this is the worst thing I can do");
Why I said this here because, recently I installed Visual studio 2008 feature pack and today while debuggig, I happened to step into the base class( CWinAppEx ) of my app class. There I found the below code..
CString strRegEntryNameWorkspace = _T("Workspace");
m_strRegSection = strRegEntryNameWorkspace;
With a little surprise, I scrolled the file, and in the top, there was another bunch of such declartions..
static const CString strRegEntryNameControlBars = _T("\\ControlBars");
static const CString strWindowPlacementRegSection = _T("WindowPlacement");
static const CString strRectMainKey = _T("MainWindowRect");
static const CString strFlagsKey = _T("Flags");
static const CString strShowCmdKey = _T("ShowCmd");
static const CString strRegEntryNameSizingBars = _T("\\SizingBars");
static const CString strRegEntryVersion = _T("ControlBarVersion");
static const CString strVersionMajorKey = _T("Major");
static const CString strVersionMinorKey = _T("Minor");
So pathetic 
modified on Tuesday, April 29, 2008 10:26 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Naveen wrote: I have read in a book that, the worst thing you can do for "optimizing the storage of constant data" is declaring a variable like..
CString g_str("this is the worst thing I can do");
Do you, or the book's author, have metrics to back this up?
"Love people and use things, not love things and use people." - Unknown
"To have a respect for ourselves guides our morals; to have deference for others governs our manners." - Laurence Sterne
|
|
|
|
|
It is actually a microsft press release book  . Programming vc++ by David Kruglinski. And the reason is
if you are writing some code like
const char g_pch[] = "test";
the g_pch get stored in the .rdata section of the code. This section hold initialized readonly data. The more stuff you put in the .rdata section, the better because even multpile copy of application is running, no need to create seperate page file.
If you wrote like
const CString g_str("this is the worst thing I can do");
Now you've got the CString object (which is quite small) in the .bss section, and you've also got a character array in the .data section, neither of which can be backed by the EXE file. To make matters worse, when the program starts, the CString class must allocate heap memory for a copy of the characters. You would be much better off using a const character array instead of a CString object.
|
|
|
|
|
i guess defining a const CString is somewhat different than defining a CString object.
the optimizer certainly takes the constness in account more easily.
interresting though.
|
|
|
|
|
May be, but not excatly what you get when you declare like
const strRegEntryNameWorkspace[] =_T("Workspace");
and you see some of the variable declared are passed to functions which have LPCTSTR as parameter. Means they are not taking any advantage of the class CString
|
|
|
|
|
hum, yes, I answered a bit too fast too... even a const CString, the compiler doesn't really know what the CString class is for, so if you need literals, it's obvious that you have to use const TCHAR*s... or at best, use the resource string table.
|
|
|
|
|
CString and optimization should never be used in the same sentence. It is common sense that constant string literals is a more optimized way of storing string literals. There seems to have been a paradigm shift over the years that optimizations are no longer valid. Its funny how Moore's law has accurately predicted the number of transistors and Wirth's law[^] is correctly predicting that applications are increasingly becoming slower and slower.
I have noticed that many software engineers excessively use CStrings and have no concept of passing values through the stack rather than the heap. It is my opinion/philosophy that software engineers should be certified sort of like a doctor or lawyer. We should all be dressed in lab coats and wearing einsteins haircut[^].
Flame away!
-David Delaune
|
|
|
|
|
Randor wrote: CString and optimization should never be used in the same sentence. It is common sense that constant string literals is a more optimized way of storing string literals. There seems to have been a paradigm shift over the years that optimizations are no longer valid. Its funny how Moore's law has accurately predicted the number of transistors and Wirth's law[^] is correctly predicting that applications are increasingly becoming slower and slower.
This problem will only grow. Especially with the new .Net languages where you don't need to worry about the memory. I've recently used c# to create a report, due to the enormous data to put into the report the memory it used was about 1 GB. After I closed the report, the memory wasn't freed.
I though no problem, thats why there is a Garbage Collector running.
Yeah right, tried to create the report again and the OutOfMemoryException was thrown.
I rather stick with c/c++ where I can control the memory, in such way I need or see fit.
Randor wrote: I have noticed that many software engineers excessively use CStrings and have no concept of passing values through the stack rather than the heap. It is my opinion/philosophy that software engineers should be certified sort of like a doctor or lawyer. We should all be dressed in lab coats and wearing einsteins aircut[^].
I like this idea  , We certainly need safety goggles too and a light saber, in case we are attacked by a lowlife BUG 
codito ergo sum
|
|
|
|
|
Randor wrote: I have noticed that many software engineers excessively use CStrings and have no concept of passing values through the stack rather than the heap
I'm confused. Are you saying you pass a CString on the stack or the heap? Where is the object? Where is the string? What exactly are you saying here?
Randor wrote: CString and optimization should never be used in the same sentence.
I beg to differ(And so does Mr. DiLascia)...
http://www.microsoft.com/msj/archive/S1F0A.aspx[^]
|
|
|
|
|
i am working in vc8 in win32. now i am changing my code to windows mobile5.0. all things worked fine, except for time.
i have used only minimal time functions in that.
they are
1. localtime 2.gmtime 3.ctime 4.mktime 5.time
i have converted localtime, and mktime. but for others i dont have any idea about how to port other functions.
please help me to port it...
RAJA
|
|
|
|
|
You have the source to each of these functions. Why not look there?
"Love people and use things, not love things and use people." - Unknown
"To have a respect for ourselves guides our morals; to have deference for others governs our manners." - Laurence Sterne
|
|
|
|
|
Hi EveryOne,
I have added a class which contains a method that accepts a VARIANT type variable in an ActivexDll written in VC++. In one of sample code I found the a value is assigned to the VARIANT type variable using a SAFEARRAY. My question is how can a string value be assigned to VARIANT type variable(type casting in strcpy does't work). Can we achieve it only by using SAFEARRAY? if yes why is it so? Is there any other way to obtain the same? kindly explain. Thank you.
Regards,
LG.
lgatcodeproject
|
|
|
|
|
Probably you should use a BSTR insted.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Even if I use the BSTR type while copying a string constant using strcpy with a type cast the application crashes. How to copy a string constant by-passing this problem?
Please find the below snippet.
<br />
STDMETHODIMP CRAPClientX::Connect(BSTR serverIP, BSTR serverPort,BSTR output)<br />
{<br />
strcpy((char *)output, "connected");<br />
return S_OK;<br />
}<br />
Regards,
LG.
lgatcodeproject
|
|
|
|
|
lgatcodeproject wrote: STDMETHODIMP CRAPClientX::Connect(BSTR serverIP, BSTR serverPort,BSTR output)
{
// TODO: Add your implementation code here
strcpy((char *)output, "connected");
return S_OK;
}
Change to
STDMETHODIMP CRAPClientX::Connect(BSTR serverIP, BSTR serverPort,BSTR * pOutput)
{
*pOutput = SysAllocString(L"connected");
return S_OK;
}
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Thanks its working now but then I have a doubt, what is that L do inside SysAllocString()function.
Regards,
LG.
lgatcodeproject
|
|
|
|
|
A BSTR is substantially a wide char string (technically it is a OLECHAR one). the L prefix creates a wide char literal.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
|
|
|
|
|
There are too many string types you can use in your VC++ project.
STL and many other non-MS libs use string class; MFC prefers CString; when it comes to COM, you will see _bstr_t and BSTR. ……
Many code in my project just do string conversions——convert from one string type to another, which makes me fell ugly.
Hello everyone, which is your favorite string type? 
A Chinese VC++ programmer
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
