|
hi,
i developed a asp.net website......it run on my system.....then i upload the only default.aspx page.......when i open the default.aspx page on internet (
then default.aspx display but there are no any tool display ,which i used on the default.aspx.
where is problem?
is only .aspx enough or other files are requried with .aspx file?
|
|
|
|
|
No, u need to upload all the files related to ur website.
The other way to do is creating appilcation of ur files...
Build -> Publish Website
U will get an application
Just copy this in ur domain space
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Friends,
This is Ashrith.
I have developed a web application.
The application works perfectly on my local machine.
But when I host the application on my domain space, I find the following problems with it:
1. Cannot be able to register.
When I try to register on the site, the same page is being shown.
2. Content not written to XML file.
I have some content in the database which should be written to an XML file when my website is visited and the same is displayed to the user.
What might be the problem?
Please help me.
Thanks in Advance.
Pl
|
|
|
|
|
ashrithracharla wrote: 1. Cannot be able to register.
When I try to register on the site, the same page is being shown.
I have no idea what you're trying to say here. We don't know what you mean by 'register' or 'the same page is being shown'. Please elaborate more, with such as an error message (if there is one), or more relevant details.
ashrithracharla wrote: 2. Content not written to XML file.
I have some content in the database which should be written to an XML file when my website is visited and the same is displayed to the user.
Perhaps no write permissions are specified on the directory that the file is being written to.
|
|
|
|
|
I am looking to add a chat service to my website. I have read that there are 2 differnt ways of doing this. 1: The traditional way of polling the web server for new messages using ajax.
2: The comet way of connecting to the server using ajax and never closing the connection so the server can push messages to the client.
My questions are about the difference in preformance and are there any differences in the bandwidth usage? Basically which is the best way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the reply, I have seen other places that pushing is better than pulling but only if your server can handle the connections of multiple users. I also heard that the client can only have 2 open http conections. I dont know what that means interms of preformance. I hope there is someone who has more knowledge on this subject.
|
|
|
|
|
Well that page says
Several such techniques exist, with various trade-offs in terms of browser support and side effects, latency, and throughput.
and then goes on to discuss aspects of a whole bunch of approaches with some quotes from various people like:
Comet is a giant hack. Even when it works flawlessly and efficiently, bringing us real-time interactive applications, deftly weaving around firewalls and browsers, avoiding unfriendly side effects, and cutting latency to near zero, it does so using mechanisms unforeseen by browser vendors, and unspecified by web standards. ”
—Jacob Rus
I don't know why you would be resistant to reading the page given your stated question.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
Arthur Schopenhauer - German philosopher (1788 - 1860)
|
|
|
|
|
Hey thanks for the link. I thought I had looked at this article but apparently I was wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
I appologize if this is not an appropriate place to ask, but I would
appreciate if someone could help me with the following issue.
I am trying to find out what is an "HTTP Location Header", but without
success for a long time already. Can anyone clarify me what it is, or
point to a good tutorial about HTTP protocol on the internet that may
have information about this?
Thank you in advance.
modified on Sunday, March 16, 2008 8:17 PM
|
|
|
|
|
Try the http rfc
Need a C# Consultant? I'm available.
Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know. -- Ernest Hemingway
|
|
|
|
|
I tried, but I could not make sense out of the paragraphs that were mentioning it in the RFC..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It specifies the URI that the requested resource can be found at. It's used primarily for redirection.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi shog. Thanks I already figured it out. Thanks to other people as well for their links.
However, there is still a small question that I have.
In case when a Web Server specifies an alternate web address for a new web server (i.e. where it wants to redirect the user) in the Location Header, then will the user be automatically redirected there, or she has to click on some link ?
I have browsed through all documentations, but could not find any information regarding this.
|
|
|
|
|
It's up to the client (web browser, usually) to decide how to react. Depending on the exact status code, most will automatically redirect.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks again Shog. But let me elaborate my confusion: one of the documents that I read, say that, the "user issues a GET command on the HTTP location header and is redirected to the destination site". As I understand, this header value is invisible to the user, so how does he issue a GET command on it? Maybe I am misunderstandings something. That is why I thought there is an error in the text, and the user is automatically redirected to the new web site.
|
|
|
|
|
um...
The user issues a GET request by telling his client software to retrieve a URL. GET requests are how client software retrieves HTTP URLs. The client software is then also responsible for handling the Location header, retrieving the URL indicated by it, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
How do you protect your document, so that only registered user can download it. How to protect the document so that when people know the file location, they can't download it without login first. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Move your download out of a public location and have it fed through a script that checks for a registered user.
|
|
|
|
|
Any code or article? Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
There are numerous ways to do it. You'll have to use your brain 
"Any sort of work in VB6 is bound to provide several WTF moments." - Christian Graus
|
|
|
|
|
I'm going to be in a situation soon where I need to serve up downloads greater then 2 gigs, which won't happen through http. I'm trying to look into what my options are... We'd like it to be clientless, as it will be cross browser/system. I like the idea of using bittorrent, but we want to avoid the client hassle. Does anyone know of a java applet that will act as a bittorrent client? Is it possible to implement a .net bittorrent client through the web browser? Is there a better option that I'm completly missing? Is ftp a viable option to look at? I would need a way to present them a download link from a web site, and I'd like to hide as much of the backside as possible. Thanks for the help!
- Dave Hurt
|
|
|
|
|
LancelowDowell wrote: I like the idea of using bittorrent, but we want to avoid the client hassle.
Last i checked, there were bittorrent clients available for... just about everything. Opera even has one built in.
LancelowDowell wrote: Does anyone know of a java applet that will act as a bittorrent client?
Sure...[^]
LancelowDowell wrote: Is ftp a viable option to look at?
If your server can handle the load, then sure. Of course, you'll run into the same problem as HTTP: most deployed browsers don't do a good job of resuming downloads if there's a network issue.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
